Child and adult vibrotactile thresholds for sinusoidal and pulsatile stimuli

Lynne E. Bernstein, Miriam B. Schechter, Moise H. Goldstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three experiments were performed to obtain vibrotactile sensitivity thresholds from hearing children and adults, and from deaf children. An adaptive two-interval forced-choice procedure was used to obtain estimates of the 70.7% point on the psychometric sensitivity curve. When hearing children of 5–6 and 9–10 years of age and adults were tested with sinusoids and haversine pulse stimuli, at 10, 100, 160, and 250 Hz or pps, respectively, only the 10-Hz stimulus resulted in an age effect. For this stimulus, young children were significantly less sensitive than adults. When sinusoids were again tested at 20, 40, 80, and 160 Hz, a small overall effect of age was observed with a significant effect only at 20 Hz. Two prelingually profoundly deaf children were tested with haversine pulse trains at 10, 50, 100, 160, and 250 pps. Both children were at least as sensitive to the tactile stimulation as were the hearing children and adults. Pulsatile stimulation, compared to sinusoidal stimulation, exhibited relatively flat threshold versus frequency functions. The present results, demonstrating no age effect for pulsatile stimulation and similar performance for deaf and hearing children, suggest that pulsatile stimulation would be appropriate in vibrotactile speech communication aids for the deaf.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-123
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume80
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

stimuli
stimulation
thresholds
hearing
sine waves
psychometrics
Stimulation
Stimulus
sensitivity
pulses
Hearing
communication
intervals
curves
estimates
Deaf
Age Effects
Deaf children
Pulse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Child and adult vibrotactile thresholds for sinusoidal and pulsatile stimuli. / Bernstein, Lynne E.; Schechter, Miriam B.; Goldstein, Moise H.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 80, No. 1, 01.01.1986, p. 118-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a41ab83379543ceb719b7db27e00b40,
title = "Child and adult vibrotactile thresholds for sinusoidal and pulsatile stimuli",
abstract = "Three experiments were performed to obtain vibrotactile sensitivity thresholds from hearing children and adults, and from deaf children. An adaptive two-interval forced-choice procedure was used to obtain estimates of the 70.7{\%} point on the psychometric sensitivity curve. When hearing children of 5–6 and 9–10 years of age and adults were tested with sinusoids and haversine pulse stimuli, at 10, 100, 160, and 250 Hz or pps, respectively, only the 10-Hz stimulus resulted in an age effect. For this stimulus, young children were significantly less sensitive than adults. When sinusoids were again tested at 20, 40, 80, and 160 Hz, a small overall effect of age was observed with a significant effect only at 20 Hz. Two prelingually profoundly deaf children were tested with haversine pulse trains at 10, 50, 100, 160, and 250 pps. Both children were at least as sensitive to the tactile stimulation as were the hearing children and adults. Pulsatile stimulation, compared to sinusoidal stimulation, exhibited relatively flat threshold versus frequency functions. The present results, demonstrating no age effect for pulsatile stimulation and similar performance for deaf and hearing children, suggest that pulsatile stimulation would be appropriate in vibrotactile speech communication aids for the deaf.",
author = "Bernstein, {Lynne E.} and Schechter, {Miriam B.} and Goldstein, {Moise H.}",
year = "1986",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.394172",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "118--123",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Child and adult vibrotactile thresholds for sinusoidal and pulsatile stimuli

AU - Bernstein, Lynne E.

AU - Schechter, Miriam B.

AU - Goldstein, Moise H.

PY - 1986/1/1

Y1 - 1986/1/1

N2 - Three experiments were performed to obtain vibrotactile sensitivity thresholds from hearing children and adults, and from deaf children. An adaptive two-interval forced-choice procedure was used to obtain estimates of the 70.7% point on the psychometric sensitivity curve. When hearing children of 5–6 and 9–10 years of age and adults were tested with sinusoids and haversine pulse stimuli, at 10, 100, 160, and 250 Hz or pps, respectively, only the 10-Hz stimulus resulted in an age effect. For this stimulus, young children were significantly less sensitive than adults. When sinusoids were again tested at 20, 40, 80, and 160 Hz, a small overall effect of age was observed with a significant effect only at 20 Hz. Two prelingually profoundly deaf children were tested with haversine pulse trains at 10, 50, 100, 160, and 250 pps. Both children were at least as sensitive to the tactile stimulation as were the hearing children and adults. Pulsatile stimulation, compared to sinusoidal stimulation, exhibited relatively flat threshold versus frequency functions. The present results, demonstrating no age effect for pulsatile stimulation and similar performance for deaf and hearing children, suggest that pulsatile stimulation would be appropriate in vibrotactile speech communication aids for the deaf.

AB - Three experiments were performed to obtain vibrotactile sensitivity thresholds from hearing children and adults, and from deaf children. An adaptive two-interval forced-choice procedure was used to obtain estimates of the 70.7% point on the psychometric sensitivity curve. When hearing children of 5–6 and 9–10 years of age and adults were tested with sinusoids and haversine pulse stimuli, at 10, 100, 160, and 250 Hz or pps, respectively, only the 10-Hz stimulus resulted in an age effect. For this stimulus, young children were significantly less sensitive than adults. When sinusoids were again tested at 20, 40, 80, and 160 Hz, a small overall effect of age was observed with a significant effect only at 20 Hz. Two prelingually profoundly deaf children were tested with haversine pulse trains at 10, 50, 100, 160, and 250 pps. Both children were at least as sensitive to the tactile stimulation as were the hearing children and adults. Pulsatile stimulation, compared to sinusoidal stimulation, exhibited relatively flat threshold versus frequency functions. The present results, demonstrating no age effect for pulsatile stimulation and similar performance for deaf and hearing children, suggest that pulsatile stimulation would be appropriate in vibrotactile speech communication aids for the deaf.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022903344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022903344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.394172

DO - 10.1121/1.394172

M3 - Article

C2 - 3745657

AN - SCOPUS:0022903344

VL - 80

SP - 118

EP - 123

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 1

ER -