Abstract
The early historical literature on cervical spine surgery lacks printed material for review, and we can rely only on pathological material from the prehistoric period that has survived as a result of anthropological investigations. After the introduction of Egyptian and early Hellenic medicine, some written material became available. This paper reviews these materials, from both books and manuscripts, in an effort to understand the development of cervical spine surgery from the perspectives of the personalities involved and the early surgical practices used. The review thus considers the following five eras of medicine: 1) prehistoric; 2) Egyptian and Babylonian; 3) Greek and early Byzantine; 4) Middle Eastern; and 5) medieval.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Journal | Neurosurgical Focus |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - 2007 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Clinical Neurology
Cite this
Cervical spine surgery in the ancient and medieval worlds. / Goodrich, James Tait.
In: Neurosurgical Focus, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2007.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cervical spine surgery in the ancient and medieval worlds.
AU - Goodrich, James Tait
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - The early historical literature on cervical spine surgery lacks printed material for review, and we can rely only on pathological material from the prehistoric period that has survived as a result of anthropological investigations. After the introduction of Egyptian and early Hellenic medicine, some written material became available. This paper reviews these materials, from both books and manuscripts, in an effort to understand the development of cervical spine surgery from the perspectives of the personalities involved and the early surgical practices used. The review thus considers the following five eras of medicine: 1) prehistoric; 2) Egyptian and Babylonian; 3) Greek and early Byzantine; 4) Middle Eastern; and 5) medieval.
AB - The early historical literature on cervical spine surgery lacks printed material for review, and we can rely only on pathological material from the prehistoric period that has survived as a result of anthropological investigations. After the introduction of Egyptian and early Hellenic medicine, some written material became available. This paper reviews these materials, from both books and manuscripts, in an effort to understand the development of cervical spine surgery from the perspectives of the personalities involved and the early surgical practices used. The review thus considers the following five eras of medicine: 1) prehistoric; 2) Egyptian and Babylonian; 3) Greek and early Byzantine; 4) Middle Eastern; and 5) medieval.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38449113736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38449113736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 17961063
AN - SCOPUS:38449113736
VL - 23
JO - Neurosurgical Focus
JF - Neurosurgical Focus
SN - 1092-0684
IS - 1
ER -