Cassava flour slurry as a low-cost alternative to commercially available gel for obstetrical ultrasound: a blinded non-inferiority trial comparison of image quality

A. Aziz, Pe'er Dar, F. Hughes, C. Solorzano, M. M. Muller, C. Salmon, M. Salmon, Nerys C. Benfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the quality of ultrasound images obtained with cassava flour slurry (CFS) compared with conventional gel in order to determine objectively whether CFS could be a true low-cost alternative. Design: Blinded non-inferiority trial. Setting: Obstetrical ultrasound unit in an academic medical centre. Population or Sample: Women with a singleton pregnancy, undergoing anatomy ultrasounds. Methods: Thirty pregnant women had standard biometry measures obtained with CFS and conventional gel. Images were compared side-by-side in random order by two blinded sonologists and rated for image resolution, detail and total image quality using a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Ratings were compared using paired t-tests. Participant and sonographer experience was measured using five-point Likert scales. Main outcome measures: Image resolution, detail, and total image quality. Participant experience of gel regarding irritation, messiness, and ease of removal. Results: We found no significant difference between perceived image quality obtained with CFS (mean = 6.2, SD = 1.2) and commercial gel (mean = 6.4, SD = 1.2) [t (28) = −1.1; P = 0.3]. Images were not rated significantly differently for either reviewer in any measure, any standardized image or any view of a specific anatomic structure. All five sonographers rated CFS as easy to obtain clear images and easy for patient and machine cleanup. Only one participant reported itching with CFS. Conclusions: CFS produces comparable image quality to commercial ultrasound gel. The dissemination of these results and the simple CFS recipe could significantly increase access to ultrasound for screening, monitoring and diagnostic purposes in resource-limited settings. Tweetable abstract: Low-cost homemade cassava flour slurry creates images equal to commercial ultrasound gel, improving access.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1179-1184
Number of pages6
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume125
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Manihot
Flour
Gels
Costs and Cost Analysis
Biometry
Pruritus
Visual Analog Scale
Pregnant Women
Anatomy
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Global health
  • low-resource settings
  • ultrasound image quality
  • ultrasound media

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Cassava flour slurry as a low-cost alternative to commercially available gel for obstetrical ultrasound : a blinded non-inferiority trial comparison of image quality. / Aziz, A.; Dar, Pe'er; Hughes, F.; Solorzano, C.; Muller, M. M.; Salmon, C.; Salmon, M.; Benfield, Nerys C.

In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 125, No. 9, 01.08.2018, p. 1179-1184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{841be22ec5e244428b6f88e1c75f7cd6,
title = "Cassava flour slurry as a low-cost alternative to commercially available gel for obstetrical ultrasound: a blinded non-inferiority trial comparison of image quality",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the quality of ultrasound images obtained with cassava flour slurry (CFS) compared with conventional gel in order to determine objectively whether CFS could be a true low-cost alternative. Design: Blinded non-inferiority trial. Setting: Obstetrical ultrasound unit in an academic medical centre. Population or Sample: Women with a singleton pregnancy, undergoing anatomy ultrasounds. Methods: Thirty pregnant women had standard biometry measures obtained with CFS and conventional gel. Images were compared side-by-side in random order by two blinded sonologists and rated for image resolution, detail and total image quality using a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Ratings were compared using paired t-tests. Participant and sonographer experience was measured using five-point Likert scales. Main outcome measures: Image resolution, detail, and total image quality. Participant experience of gel regarding irritation, messiness, and ease of removal. Results: We found no significant difference between perceived image quality obtained with CFS (mean = 6.2, SD = 1.2) and commercial gel (mean = 6.4, SD = 1.2) [t (28) = −1.1; P = 0.3]. Images were not rated significantly differently for either reviewer in any measure, any standardized image or any view of a specific anatomic structure. All five sonographers rated CFS as easy to obtain clear images and easy for patient and machine cleanup. Only one participant reported itching with CFS. Conclusions: CFS produces comparable image quality to commercial ultrasound gel. The dissemination of these results and the simple CFS recipe could significantly increase access to ultrasound for screening, monitoring and diagnostic purposes in resource-limited settings. Tweetable abstract: Low-cost homemade cassava flour slurry creates images equal to commercial ultrasound gel, improving access.",
keywords = "Global health, low-resource settings, ultrasound image quality, ultrasound media",
author = "A. Aziz and Pe'er Dar and F. Hughes and C. Solorzano and Muller, {M. M.} and C. Salmon and M. Salmon and Benfield, {Nerys C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1471-0528.15123",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "1179--1184",
journal = "BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cassava flour slurry as a low-cost alternative to commercially available gel for obstetrical ultrasound

T2 - a blinded non-inferiority trial comparison of image quality

AU - Aziz, A.

AU - Dar, Pe'er

AU - Hughes, F.

AU - Solorzano, C.

AU - Muller, M. M.

AU - Salmon, C.

AU - Salmon, M.

AU - Benfield, Nerys C.

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the quality of ultrasound images obtained with cassava flour slurry (CFS) compared with conventional gel in order to determine objectively whether CFS could be a true low-cost alternative. Design: Blinded non-inferiority trial. Setting: Obstetrical ultrasound unit in an academic medical centre. Population or Sample: Women with a singleton pregnancy, undergoing anatomy ultrasounds. Methods: Thirty pregnant women had standard biometry measures obtained with CFS and conventional gel. Images were compared side-by-side in random order by two blinded sonologists and rated for image resolution, detail and total image quality using a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Ratings were compared using paired t-tests. Participant and sonographer experience was measured using five-point Likert scales. Main outcome measures: Image resolution, detail, and total image quality. Participant experience of gel regarding irritation, messiness, and ease of removal. Results: We found no significant difference between perceived image quality obtained with CFS (mean = 6.2, SD = 1.2) and commercial gel (mean = 6.4, SD = 1.2) [t (28) = −1.1; P = 0.3]. Images were not rated significantly differently for either reviewer in any measure, any standardized image or any view of a specific anatomic structure. All five sonographers rated CFS as easy to obtain clear images and easy for patient and machine cleanup. Only one participant reported itching with CFS. Conclusions: CFS produces comparable image quality to commercial ultrasound gel. The dissemination of these results and the simple CFS recipe could significantly increase access to ultrasound for screening, monitoring and diagnostic purposes in resource-limited settings. Tweetable abstract: Low-cost homemade cassava flour slurry creates images equal to commercial ultrasound gel, improving access.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the quality of ultrasound images obtained with cassava flour slurry (CFS) compared with conventional gel in order to determine objectively whether CFS could be a true low-cost alternative. Design: Blinded non-inferiority trial. Setting: Obstetrical ultrasound unit in an academic medical centre. Population or Sample: Women with a singleton pregnancy, undergoing anatomy ultrasounds. Methods: Thirty pregnant women had standard biometry measures obtained with CFS and conventional gel. Images were compared side-by-side in random order by two blinded sonologists and rated for image resolution, detail and total image quality using a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Ratings were compared using paired t-tests. Participant and sonographer experience was measured using five-point Likert scales. Main outcome measures: Image resolution, detail, and total image quality. Participant experience of gel regarding irritation, messiness, and ease of removal. Results: We found no significant difference between perceived image quality obtained with CFS (mean = 6.2, SD = 1.2) and commercial gel (mean = 6.4, SD = 1.2) [t (28) = −1.1; P = 0.3]. Images were not rated significantly differently for either reviewer in any measure, any standardized image or any view of a specific anatomic structure. All five sonographers rated CFS as easy to obtain clear images and easy for patient and machine cleanup. Only one participant reported itching with CFS. Conclusions: CFS produces comparable image quality to commercial ultrasound gel. The dissemination of these results and the simple CFS recipe could significantly increase access to ultrasound for screening, monitoring and diagnostic purposes in resource-limited settings. Tweetable abstract: Low-cost homemade cassava flour slurry creates images equal to commercial ultrasound gel, improving access.

KW - Global health

KW - low-resource settings

KW - ultrasound image quality

KW - ultrasound media

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049848511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049848511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.15123

DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.15123

M3 - Article

C2 - 29328522

AN - SCOPUS:85049848511

VL - 125

SP - 1179

EP - 1184

JO - BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology

JF - BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 9

ER -