Cardiovascular Risk Profiles of Oral Contraceptive Users and Nonusers: A Population-Based Study

P. M. Flint, K. L. Lapane, M. M. Barbour, Carol A. Derby, R. A. Carleton, A. L. Hume

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The purpose of this population-based study was to evaluate whether women taking oral contraceptive products (OCPs) have more favorable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles than women not taking OCPs. Methods. Data including sociodemographic variables and CVD risk factors from 5,239 women of reproductive age were gathered in six cross-sectional household surveys. Differences in CVD risk factor profiles between OCP users and nonusers were compared using logistic regression. Younger users and older users were compared with nonusers of the same age groups. Results. Women using OCPs (n = 807) were younger and had higher socioeconomic status than nonusers (n = 4,432). More users than nonusers were current smokers (43.1% vs 36.6%, P = 0.0011), had a total serum cholesterol level ≥ 240 mg/dl (12.7% vs 6.0%, P = 0.0001), and tended to rate themselves to be at low risk for CVD (48.3% vs 45.5%, P = 0.17). Fewer OCP users than nonusers had an HDL cholesterol level ≤ 35 mg/dl (4.0% vs 6.9%, P = 0.0039). Conclusions. Although they tended to perceive themselves to be at low risk, women taking OCPs in this study had worse CVD risk profiles than women not reporting hormonal contraception and are candidates for cardiovascular risk reduction strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)586-590
Number of pages5
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oral Contraceptives
Cardiovascular Diseases
Population
Risk Reduction Behavior
Risk-Taking
Contraception
Social Class
HDL Cholesterol
Age Groups
Cross-Sectional Studies
Logistic Models
Cholesterol
Serum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Cardiovascular Risk Profiles of Oral Contraceptive Users and Nonusers : A Population-Based Study. / Flint, P. M.; Lapane, K. L.; Barbour, M. M.; Derby, Carol A.; Carleton, R. A.; Hume, A. L.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 6, 11.1995, p. 586-590.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flint, P. M. ; Lapane, K. L. ; Barbour, M. M. ; Derby, Carol A. ; Carleton, R. A. ; Hume, A. L. / Cardiovascular Risk Profiles of Oral Contraceptive Users and Nonusers : A Population-Based Study. In: Preventive Medicine. 1995 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 586-590.
@article{e95193a581ba4002990b8a649c1947e7,
title = "Cardiovascular Risk Profiles of Oral Contraceptive Users and Nonusers: A Population-Based Study",
abstract = "Background. The purpose of this population-based study was to evaluate whether women taking oral contraceptive products (OCPs) have more favorable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles than women not taking OCPs. Methods. Data including sociodemographic variables and CVD risk factors from 5,239 women of reproductive age were gathered in six cross-sectional household surveys. Differences in CVD risk factor profiles between OCP users and nonusers were compared using logistic regression. Younger users and older users were compared with nonusers of the same age groups. Results. Women using OCPs (n = 807) were younger and had higher socioeconomic status than nonusers (n = 4,432). More users than nonusers were current smokers (43.1{\%} vs 36.6{\%}, P = 0.0011), had a total serum cholesterol level ≥ 240 mg/dl (12.7{\%} vs 6.0{\%}, P = 0.0001), and tended to rate themselves to be at low risk for CVD (48.3{\%} vs 45.5{\%}, P = 0.17). Fewer OCP users than nonusers had an HDL cholesterol level ≤ 35 mg/dl (4.0{\%} vs 6.9{\%}, P = 0.0039). Conclusions. Although they tended to perceive themselves to be at low risk, women taking OCPs in this study had worse CVD risk profiles than women not reporting hormonal contraception and are candidates for cardiovascular risk reduction strategies.",
author = "Flint, {P. M.} and Lapane, {K. L.} and Barbour, {M. M.} and Derby, {Carol A.} and Carleton, {R. A.} and Hume, {A. L.}",
year = "1995",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1006/pmed.1995.1093",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "586--590",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiovascular Risk Profiles of Oral Contraceptive Users and Nonusers

T2 - A Population-Based Study

AU - Flint, P. M.

AU - Lapane, K. L.

AU - Barbour, M. M.

AU - Derby, Carol A.

AU - Carleton, R. A.

AU - Hume, A. L.

PY - 1995/11

Y1 - 1995/11

N2 - Background. The purpose of this population-based study was to evaluate whether women taking oral contraceptive products (OCPs) have more favorable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles than women not taking OCPs. Methods. Data including sociodemographic variables and CVD risk factors from 5,239 women of reproductive age were gathered in six cross-sectional household surveys. Differences in CVD risk factor profiles between OCP users and nonusers were compared using logistic regression. Younger users and older users were compared with nonusers of the same age groups. Results. Women using OCPs (n = 807) were younger and had higher socioeconomic status than nonusers (n = 4,432). More users than nonusers were current smokers (43.1% vs 36.6%, P = 0.0011), had a total serum cholesterol level ≥ 240 mg/dl (12.7% vs 6.0%, P = 0.0001), and tended to rate themselves to be at low risk for CVD (48.3% vs 45.5%, P = 0.17). Fewer OCP users than nonusers had an HDL cholesterol level ≤ 35 mg/dl (4.0% vs 6.9%, P = 0.0039). Conclusions. Although they tended to perceive themselves to be at low risk, women taking OCPs in this study had worse CVD risk profiles than women not reporting hormonal contraception and are candidates for cardiovascular risk reduction strategies.

AB - Background. The purpose of this population-based study was to evaluate whether women taking oral contraceptive products (OCPs) have more favorable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles than women not taking OCPs. Methods. Data including sociodemographic variables and CVD risk factors from 5,239 women of reproductive age were gathered in six cross-sectional household surveys. Differences in CVD risk factor profiles between OCP users and nonusers were compared using logistic regression. Younger users and older users were compared with nonusers of the same age groups. Results. Women using OCPs (n = 807) were younger and had higher socioeconomic status than nonusers (n = 4,432). More users than nonusers were current smokers (43.1% vs 36.6%, P = 0.0011), had a total serum cholesterol level ≥ 240 mg/dl (12.7% vs 6.0%, P = 0.0001), and tended to rate themselves to be at low risk for CVD (48.3% vs 45.5%, P = 0.17). Fewer OCP users than nonusers had an HDL cholesterol level ≤ 35 mg/dl (4.0% vs 6.9%, P = 0.0039). Conclusions. Although they tended to perceive themselves to be at low risk, women taking OCPs in this study had worse CVD risk profiles than women not reporting hormonal contraception and are candidates for cardiovascular risk reduction strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028850060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028850060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/pmed.1995.1093

DO - 10.1006/pmed.1995.1093

M3 - Article

C2 - 8610082

AN - SCOPUS:0028850060

VL - 24

SP - 586

EP - 590

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 6

ER -