Cardiac sodium channels (hH1) are intrinsically more sensitive to block by lidocaine than are skeletal muscle (μ1) channels

H. Bradley Nuss, Gordon F. Tomaselli, Eduardo Marbán

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When lidocaine is given systemically, cardiac Na channels are blocked preferentially over those in skeletal muscle and nerve. This apparent increased affinity is commonly assumed to arise solely from the fact that cardiac Na channels spend a large fraction of their time in the inactivated state, which exhibits a high affinity for local anesthetics. The oocyte expression system was used to compare systematically the sensitivities of skeletal (μ1-β1) and cardiac (hH1-β1) Na channels to block by lidocaine, under conditions in which the only difference was the choice of α subunit. To check for differences in tonic block, Na currents were elicited after 3 min of exposure to various lidocaine concentrations at -100 mV, a potential at which both hH1-β1 and μ1-β1 channels were fully reprimed. Surprisingly, hH1-β1 Na channels were threefold more sensitive to rested- state block by lidocaine (402 ± 36 μM, n = 4-22) than were μ1-β1 Na channels (1,168 ± 34 μM, n = 7-19). In contrast, the inactivated state binding affinities determined at partially depolarized holding potentials (h(∞)≃0.2) were similar (K(d) = 16 ± 1 μM, n = 3-9 for hH1-β1 and 12 ± 2 μM, n = 4-11 μ1-β1). Lidocaine produced more use-dependent block of peak hH1-β1 Na current elicited by trains of short(10 ms) or long- (1 s) duration step depolarizations (0.5 Hz, -20 mV) than of μ1-β1 Na current. During exposure to lidocaine, hH1-β1 channels recover from inactivation at -100 mV after a prolonged delay (20 ms), while μ1-β1 channels begin reprinting immediately. The overall time course of recovery from inactivation in the presence of lidocaine is much slower in hH1-β1 than in μ1-β1 channels. These unexpected findings suggest that structural differences in the α subunits impart intrinsically different lidocaine sensitivities to the two isoforms. The differences in steady state affinities and in repriming kinetics are both in the correct direction to help explain the increased potency of cardiac Na channel block by local anesthetics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1193-1209
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of General Physiology
Volume106
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sodium Channels
Lidocaine
Skeletal Muscle
Local Anesthetics
Oocytes
Protein Isoforms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Cite this

Cardiac sodium channels (hH1) are intrinsically more sensitive to block by lidocaine than are skeletal muscle (μ1) channels. / Nuss, H. Bradley; Tomaselli, Gordon F.; Marbán, Eduardo.

In: Journal of General Physiology, Vol. 106, No. 6, 01.12.1995, p. 1193-1209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b5fab2c0fd544df885aa84acb237476,
title = "Cardiac sodium channels (hH1) are intrinsically more sensitive to block by lidocaine than are skeletal muscle (μ1) channels",
abstract = "When lidocaine is given systemically, cardiac Na channels are blocked preferentially over those in skeletal muscle and nerve. This apparent increased affinity is commonly assumed to arise solely from the fact that cardiac Na channels spend a large fraction of their time in the inactivated state, which exhibits a high affinity for local anesthetics. The oocyte expression system was used to compare systematically the sensitivities of skeletal (μ1-β1) and cardiac (hH1-β1) Na channels to block by lidocaine, under conditions in which the only difference was the choice of α subunit. To check for differences in tonic block, Na currents were elicited after 3 min of exposure to various lidocaine concentrations at -100 mV, a potential at which both hH1-β1 and μ1-β1 channels were fully reprimed. Surprisingly, hH1-β1 Na channels were threefold more sensitive to rested- state block by lidocaine (402 ± 36 μM, n = 4-22) than were μ1-β1 Na channels (1,168 ± 34 μM, n = 7-19). In contrast, the inactivated state binding affinities determined at partially depolarized holding potentials (h(∞)≃0.2) were similar (K(d) = 16 ± 1 μM, n = 3-9 for hH1-β1 and 12 ± 2 μM, n = 4-11 μ1-β1). Lidocaine produced more use-dependent block of peak hH1-β1 Na current elicited by trains of short(10 ms) or long- (1 s) duration step depolarizations (0.5 Hz, -20 mV) than of μ1-β1 Na current. During exposure to lidocaine, hH1-β1 channels recover from inactivation at -100 mV after a prolonged delay (20 ms), while μ1-β1 channels begin reprinting immediately. The overall time course of recovery from inactivation in the presence of lidocaine is much slower in hH1-β1 than in μ1-β1 channels. These unexpected findings suggest that structural differences in the α subunits impart intrinsically different lidocaine sensitivities to the two isoforms. The differences in steady state affinities and in repriming kinetics are both in the correct direction to help explain the increased potency of cardiac Na channel block by local anesthetics.",
author = "Nuss, {H. Bradley} and Tomaselli, {Gordon F.} and Eduardo Marb{\'a}n",
year = "1995",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1085/jgp.106.6.1193",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "1193--1209",
journal = "Journal of General Physiology",
issn = "0022-1295",
publisher = "Rockefeller University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac sodium channels (hH1) are intrinsically more sensitive to block by lidocaine than are skeletal muscle (μ1) channels

AU - Nuss, H. Bradley

AU - Tomaselli, Gordon F.

AU - Marbán, Eduardo

PY - 1995/12/1

Y1 - 1995/12/1

N2 - When lidocaine is given systemically, cardiac Na channels are blocked preferentially over those in skeletal muscle and nerve. This apparent increased affinity is commonly assumed to arise solely from the fact that cardiac Na channels spend a large fraction of their time in the inactivated state, which exhibits a high affinity for local anesthetics. The oocyte expression system was used to compare systematically the sensitivities of skeletal (μ1-β1) and cardiac (hH1-β1) Na channels to block by lidocaine, under conditions in which the only difference was the choice of α subunit. To check for differences in tonic block, Na currents were elicited after 3 min of exposure to various lidocaine concentrations at -100 mV, a potential at which both hH1-β1 and μ1-β1 channels were fully reprimed. Surprisingly, hH1-β1 Na channels were threefold more sensitive to rested- state block by lidocaine (402 ± 36 μM, n = 4-22) than were μ1-β1 Na channels (1,168 ± 34 μM, n = 7-19). In contrast, the inactivated state binding affinities determined at partially depolarized holding potentials (h(∞)≃0.2) were similar (K(d) = 16 ± 1 μM, n = 3-9 for hH1-β1 and 12 ± 2 μM, n = 4-11 μ1-β1). Lidocaine produced more use-dependent block of peak hH1-β1 Na current elicited by trains of short(10 ms) or long- (1 s) duration step depolarizations (0.5 Hz, -20 mV) than of μ1-β1 Na current. During exposure to lidocaine, hH1-β1 channels recover from inactivation at -100 mV after a prolonged delay (20 ms), while μ1-β1 channels begin reprinting immediately. The overall time course of recovery from inactivation in the presence of lidocaine is much slower in hH1-β1 than in μ1-β1 channels. These unexpected findings suggest that structural differences in the α subunits impart intrinsically different lidocaine sensitivities to the two isoforms. The differences in steady state affinities and in repriming kinetics are both in the correct direction to help explain the increased potency of cardiac Na channel block by local anesthetics.

AB - When lidocaine is given systemically, cardiac Na channels are blocked preferentially over those in skeletal muscle and nerve. This apparent increased affinity is commonly assumed to arise solely from the fact that cardiac Na channels spend a large fraction of their time in the inactivated state, which exhibits a high affinity for local anesthetics. The oocyte expression system was used to compare systematically the sensitivities of skeletal (μ1-β1) and cardiac (hH1-β1) Na channels to block by lidocaine, under conditions in which the only difference was the choice of α subunit. To check for differences in tonic block, Na currents were elicited after 3 min of exposure to various lidocaine concentrations at -100 mV, a potential at which both hH1-β1 and μ1-β1 channels were fully reprimed. Surprisingly, hH1-β1 Na channels were threefold more sensitive to rested- state block by lidocaine (402 ± 36 μM, n = 4-22) than were μ1-β1 Na channels (1,168 ± 34 μM, n = 7-19). In contrast, the inactivated state binding affinities determined at partially depolarized holding potentials (h(∞)≃0.2) were similar (K(d) = 16 ± 1 μM, n = 3-9 for hH1-β1 and 12 ± 2 μM, n = 4-11 μ1-β1). Lidocaine produced more use-dependent block of peak hH1-β1 Na current elicited by trains of short(10 ms) or long- (1 s) duration step depolarizations (0.5 Hz, -20 mV) than of μ1-β1 Na current. During exposure to lidocaine, hH1-β1 channels recover from inactivation at -100 mV after a prolonged delay (20 ms), while μ1-β1 channels begin reprinting immediately. The overall time course of recovery from inactivation in the presence of lidocaine is much slower in hH1-β1 than in μ1-β1 channels. These unexpected findings suggest that structural differences in the α subunits impart intrinsically different lidocaine sensitivities to the two isoforms. The differences in steady state affinities and in repriming kinetics are both in the correct direction to help explain the increased potency of cardiac Na channel block by local anesthetics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029614785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029614785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1085/jgp.106.6.1193

DO - 10.1085/jgp.106.6.1193

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 1193

EP - 1209

JO - Journal of General Physiology

JF - Journal of General Physiology

SN - 0022-1295

IS - 6

ER -