Cardiac MRI scar patterns differ by sex in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy cohort

Zak Loring, David G. Strauss, Gary Gerstenblith, Gordon F. Tomaselli, Robert G. Weiss, Katherine C. Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recent meta-analyses suggest that the effectiveness of cardiac devices may differ between genders. Compared to men, women may not benefit as much from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), yet benefit more from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Myocardial scar burden is associated with increased incidence of appropriate ICD shocks but decreased response to CRT and may explain gender differences in device benefit. Objective: To test the hypothesis that the extent of myocardial scar is less in women than men. Methods: In 235 patients referred for primary prevention ICDs who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, we compared scar size by gender. Analyses were performed for all patients (ICD cohort) and those receiving biventricular pacemakers (CRT subgroup). Results: In the ICD cohort, women (vs men) had a higher prevalence of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM; 64% vs 39%; P<.001), which accounted for a smaller overall scar burden (0.5% vs 13%, P<.01). Likewise, in the CRT subgroup, the higher prevalence of NICM in women (83% vs 46%; P =.01) also contributed to a smaller scar size (0% vs 13%; P<.01). Women also had significantly less scarring of the inferolateral left ventricular wall. Conclusions: In a cohort of patients undergoing clinically indicated ICD and CRT, women had less myocardial scar than did men. This difference was primarily driven by a higher prevalence of NICM in women. These findings may have important implications for the future study of gender disparities in ICD and CRT outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)659-665
Number of pages7
JournalHeart Rhythm
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Implantable Defibrillators
Cicatrix
Equipment and Supplies
Primary Prevention
Cardiomyopathies
Meta-Analysis
Shock
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Incidence

Keywords

  • Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Gender
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Cardiac MRI scar patterns differ by sex in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy cohort. / Loring, Zak; Strauss, David G.; Gerstenblith, Gary; Tomaselli, Gordon F.; Weiss, Robert G.; Wu, Katherine C.

In: Heart Rhythm, Vol. 10, No. 5, 01.05.2013, p. 659-665.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Loring, Zak ; Strauss, David G. ; Gerstenblith, Gary ; Tomaselli, Gordon F. ; Weiss, Robert G. ; Wu, Katherine C. / Cardiac MRI scar patterns differ by sex in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy cohort. In: Heart Rhythm. 2013 ; Vol. 10, No. 5. pp. 659-665.
@article{91b86ab641624021bfc74edcc3b5e097,
title = "Cardiac MRI scar patterns differ by sex in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy cohort",
abstract = "Background: Recent meta-analyses suggest that the effectiveness of cardiac devices may differ between genders. Compared to men, women may not benefit as much from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), yet benefit more from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Myocardial scar burden is associated with increased incidence of appropriate ICD shocks but decreased response to CRT and may explain gender differences in device benefit. Objective: To test the hypothesis that the extent of myocardial scar is less in women than men. Methods: In 235 patients referred for primary prevention ICDs who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, we compared scar size by gender. Analyses were performed for all patients (ICD cohort) and those receiving biventricular pacemakers (CRT subgroup). Results: In the ICD cohort, women (vs men) had a higher prevalence of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM; 64{\%} vs 39{\%}; P<.001), which accounted for a smaller overall scar burden (0.5{\%} vs 13{\%}, P<.01). Likewise, in the CRT subgroup, the higher prevalence of NICM in women (83{\%} vs 46{\%}; P =.01) also contributed to a smaller scar size (0{\%} vs 13{\%}; P<.01). Women also had significantly less scarring of the inferolateral left ventricular wall. Conclusions: In a cohort of patients undergoing clinically indicated ICD and CRT, women had less myocardial scar than did men. This difference was primarily driven by a higher prevalence of NICM in women. These findings may have important implications for the future study of gender disparities in ICD and CRT outcomes.",
keywords = "Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Gender, Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators",
author = "Zak Loring and Strauss, {David G.} and Gary Gerstenblith and Tomaselli, {Gordon F.} and Weiss, {Robert G.} and Wu, {Katherine C.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "659--665",
journal = "Heart Rhythm",
issn = "1547-5271",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac MRI scar patterns differ by sex in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy cohort

AU - Loring, Zak

AU - Strauss, David G.

AU - Gerstenblith, Gary

AU - Tomaselli, Gordon F.

AU - Weiss, Robert G.

AU - Wu, Katherine C.

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - Background: Recent meta-analyses suggest that the effectiveness of cardiac devices may differ between genders. Compared to men, women may not benefit as much from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), yet benefit more from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Myocardial scar burden is associated with increased incidence of appropriate ICD shocks but decreased response to CRT and may explain gender differences in device benefit. Objective: To test the hypothesis that the extent of myocardial scar is less in women than men. Methods: In 235 patients referred for primary prevention ICDs who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, we compared scar size by gender. Analyses were performed for all patients (ICD cohort) and those receiving biventricular pacemakers (CRT subgroup). Results: In the ICD cohort, women (vs men) had a higher prevalence of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM; 64% vs 39%; P<.001), which accounted for a smaller overall scar burden (0.5% vs 13%, P<.01). Likewise, in the CRT subgroup, the higher prevalence of NICM in women (83% vs 46%; P =.01) also contributed to a smaller scar size (0% vs 13%; P<.01). Women also had significantly less scarring of the inferolateral left ventricular wall. Conclusions: In a cohort of patients undergoing clinically indicated ICD and CRT, women had less myocardial scar than did men. This difference was primarily driven by a higher prevalence of NICM in women. These findings may have important implications for the future study of gender disparities in ICD and CRT outcomes.

AB - Background: Recent meta-analyses suggest that the effectiveness of cardiac devices may differ between genders. Compared to men, women may not benefit as much from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), yet benefit more from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Myocardial scar burden is associated with increased incidence of appropriate ICD shocks but decreased response to CRT and may explain gender differences in device benefit. Objective: To test the hypothesis that the extent of myocardial scar is less in women than men. Methods: In 235 patients referred for primary prevention ICDs who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, we compared scar size by gender. Analyses were performed for all patients (ICD cohort) and those receiving biventricular pacemakers (CRT subgroup). Results: In the ICD cohort, women (vs men) had a higher prevalence of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM; 64% vs 39%; P<.001), which accounted for a smaller overall scar burden (0.5% vs 13%, P<.01). Likewise, in the CRT subgroup, the higher prevalence of NICM in women (83% vs 46%; P =.01) also contributed to a smaller scar size (0% vs 13%; P<.01). Women also had significantly less scarring of the inferolateral left ventricular wall. Conclusions: In a cohort of patients undergoing clinically indicated ICD and CRT, women had less myocardial scar than did men. This difference was primarily driven by a higher prevalence of NICM in women. These findings may have important implications for the future study of gender disparities in ICD and CRT outcomes.

KW - Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy

KW - Gender

KW - Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876688406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876688406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.003

DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.003

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 659

EP - 665

JO - Heart Rhythm

JF - Heart Rhythm

SN - 1547-5271

IS - 5

ER -