Can science test supernatural worldviews?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several prominent scientists, philosophers, and scientific institutions have argued that science cannot test supernatural worldviews on the grounds that (1) science presupposes a naturalistic worldview (Naturalism) or that (2) claims involving supernatural phenomena are inherently beyond the scope of scientific investigation. The present paper argues that these assumptions are questionable and that indeed science can test supernatural claims. While scientific evidence may ultimately support a naturalistic worldview, science does not presuppose Naturalism as an a priori commitment, and supernatural claims are amenable to scientific evaluation. This conclusion challenges the rationale behind a recent judicial ruling in the United States concerning the teaching of "Intelligent Design" in public schools as an alternative to evolution and the official statements of two major scientific institutions that exert a substantial influence on science educational policies in the United States. Given that science does have implications concerning the probable truth of supernatural worldviews, claims should not be excluded a priori from science education simply because they might be characterized as supernatural, paranormal, or religious. Rather, claims should be excluded from science education when the evidence does not support them, regardless of whether they are designated as 'natural' or 'supernatural'.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)813-837
Number of pages25
JournalScience and Education
Volume18
Issue number6-7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

worldview
science
scientific institution
naturalism
educational policy
evidence
education
commitment
Teaching
evaluation
school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Can science test supernatural worldviews? / Fishman, Yonatan I.

In: Science and Education, Vol. 18, No. 6-7, 06.2009, p. 813-837.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4426bfdc7c5245fb8a8ff4912e5543da,
title = "Can science test supernatural worldviews?",
abstract = "Several prominent scientists, philosophers, and scientific institutions have argued that science cannot test supernatural worldviews on the grounds that (1) science presupposes a naturalistic worldview (Naturalism) or that (2) claims involving supernatural phenomena are inherently beyond the scope of scientific investigation. The present paper argues that these assumptions are questionable and that indeed science can test supernatural claims. While scientific evidence may ultimately support a naturalistic worldview, science does not presuppose Naturalism as an a priori commitment, and supernatural claims are amenable to scientific evaluation. This conclusion challenges the rationale behind a recent judicial ruling in the United States concerning the teaching of {"}Intelligent Design{"} in public schools as an alternative to evolution and the official statements of two major scientific institutions that exert a substantial influence on science educational policies in the United States. Given that science does have implications concerning the probable truth of supernatural worldviews, claims should not be excluded a priori from science education simply because they might be characterized as supernatural, paranormal, or religious. Rather, claims should be excluded from science education when the evidence does not support them, regardless of whether they are designated as 'natural' or 'supernatural'.",
author = "Fishman, {Yonatan I.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11191-007-9108-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "813--837",
journal = "Science and Education",
issn = "0926-7220",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6-7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can science test supernatural worldviews?

AU - Fishman, Yonatan I.

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Several prominent scientists, philosophers, and scientific institutions have argued that science cannot test supernatural worldviews on the grounds that (1) science presupposes a naturalistic worldview (Naturalism) or that (2) claims involving supernatural phenomena are inherently beyond the scope of scientific investigation. The present paper argues that these assumptions are questionable and that indeed science can test supernatural claims. While scientific evidence may ultimately support a naturalistic worldview, science does not presuppose Naturalism as an a priori commitment, and supernatural claims are amenable to scientific evaluation. This conclusion challenges the rationale behind a recent judicial ruling in the United States concerning the teaching of "Intelligent Design" in public schools as an alternative to evolution and the official statements of two major scientific institutions that exert a substantial influence on science educational policies in the United States. Given that science does have implications concerning the probable truth of supernatural worldviews, claims should not be excluded a priori from science education simply because they might be characterized as supernatural, paranormal, or religious. Rather, claims should be excluded from science education when the evidence does not support them, regardless of whether they are designated as 'natural' or 'supernatural'.

AB - Several prominent scientists, philosophers, and scientific institutions have argued that science cannot test supernatural worldviews on the grounds that (1) science presupposes a naturalistic worldview (Naturalism) or that (2) claims involving supernatural phenomena are inherently beyond the scope of scientific investigation. The present paper argues that these assumptions are questionable and that indeed science can test supernatural claims. While scientific evidence may ultimately support a naturalistic worldview, science does not presuppose Naturalism as an a priori commitment, and supernatural claims are amenable to scientific evaluation. This conclusion challenges the rationale behind a recent judicial ruling in the United States concerning the teaching of "Intelligent Design" in public schools as an alternative to evolution and the official statements of two major scientific institutions that exert a substantial influence on science educational policies in the United States. Given that science does have implications concerning the probable truth of supernatural worldviews, claims should not be excluded a priori from science education simply because they might be characterized as supernatural, paranormal, or religious. Rather, claims should be excluded from science education when the evidence does not support them, regardless of whether they are designated as 'natural' or 'supernatural'.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650077680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650077680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11191-007-9108-4

DO - 10.1007/s11191-007-9108-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67650077680

VL - 18

SP - 813

EP - 837

JO - Science and Education

JF - Science and Education

SN - 0926-7220

IS - 6-7

ER -