Bronx community collaborative opportunities for research and education: Implementation and evaluation of a community–academic partnership

Arthur E. Blank, Elisa S. Weiss, Barbara Salcedo, Eileen Enny Leach, Bruce Rapkin, Franco Barsanti, Paul Meissner, Samuel Deleon, Paloma I. Hernandez, Elizabeth A. Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Collaborations between community health and academic partners hold promise for improving community health through research. Objectives: To develop, implement, and evaluate a partnership to build capacity for community-based research. Methods: Development of the partnership was based on a participatory model that aimed to nurture strong infrastructure, clear communication, and trust between partners. Research training was individualized to assessed needs. Methods of evaluation included online surveys of partnership members comparing years 1 and 2 and appreciative inquiry (AI) interviews in year 3. Results and Lessons Learned: Course corrections from year 1 responses were implemented, and reflected in improvements on the second survey. Interviews highlighted mutual benefits of infrastructure developed in partnership; threats to sustainability were identified. Lessons learned included the importance of early course correction based on feedback, opportunities for communication, and building trust and a shared language. Conclusions: Partnerships develop through commitment and trust. Routine assessments and course correction may enable productive research partnerships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-282
Number of pages10
JournalProgress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Education
evaluation
Research
community
education
Communication
Interviews
Health
infrastructure
development of methods
Language
communication
interview
health
online survey
sustainability
commitment
threat
language
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Access
  • And evaluation
  • Community health partnerships
  • Community health research
  • Evaluation studies
  • Health care evaluation mechanisms
  • Health care quality
  • Process issues
  • Program evaluation
  • Quality of health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Bronx community collaborative opportunities for research and education : Implementation and evaluation of a community–academic partnership. / Blank, Arthur E.; Weiss, Elisa S.; Salcedo, Barbara; Leach, Eileen Enny; Rapkin, Bruce; Barsanti, Franco; Meissner, Paul; Deleon, Samuel; Hernandez, Paloma I.; Walker, Elizabeth A.

In: Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.09.2019, p. 273-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7000dd0795244c2a8961b449e81d2147,
title = "Bronx community collaborative opportunities for research and education: Implementation and evaluation of a community–academic partnership",
abstract = "Background: Collaborations between community health and academic partners hold promise for improving community health through research. Objectives: To develop, implement, and evaluate a partnership to build capacity for community-based research. Methods: Development of the partnership was based on a participatory model that aimed to nurture strong infrastructure, clear communication, and trust between partners. Research training was individualized to assessed needs. Methods of evaluation included online surveys of partnership members comparing years 1 and 2 and appreciative inquiry (AI) interviews in year 3. Results and Lessons Learned: Course corrections from year 1 responses were implemented, and reflected in improvements on the second survey. Interviews highlighted mutual benefits of infrastructure developed in partnership; threats to sustainability were identified. Lessons learned included the importance of early course correction based on feedback, opportunities for communication, and building trust and a shared language. Conclusions: Partnerships develop through commitment and trust. Routine assessments and course correction may enable productive research partnerships.",
keywords = "Access, And evaluation, Community health partnerships, Community health research, Evaluation studies, Health care evaluation mechanisms, Health care quality, Process issues, Program evaluation, Quality of health care",
author = "Blank, {Arthur E.} and Weiss, {Elisa S.} and Barbara Salcedo and Leach, {Eileen Enny} and Bruce Rapkin and Franco Barsanti and Paul Meissner and Samuel Deleon and Hernandez, {Paloma I.} and Walker, {Elizabeth A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/cpr.2019.0055",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "273--282",
journal = "Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action",
issn = "1557-0541",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bronx community collaborative opportunities for research and education

T2 - Implementation and evaluation of a community–academic partnership

AU - Blank, Arthur E.

AU - Weiss, Elisa S.

AU - Salcedo, Barbara

AU - Leach, Eileen Enny

AU - Rapkin, Bruce

AU - Barsanti, Franco

AU - Meissner, Paul

AU - Deleon, Samuel

AU - Hernandez, Paloma I.

AU - Walker, Elizabeth A.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Background: Collaborations between community health and academic partners hold promise for improving community health through research. Objectives: To develop, implement, and evaluate a partnership to build capacity for community-based research. Methods: Development of the partnership was based on a participatory model that aimed to nurture strong infrastructure, clear communication, and trust between partners. Research training was individualized to assessed needs. Methods of evaluation included online surveys of partnership members comparing years 1 and 2 and appreciative inquiry (AI) interviews in year 3. Results and Lessons Learned: Course corrections from year 1 responses were implemented, and reflected in improvements on the second survey. Interviews highlighted mutual benefits of infrastructure developed in partnership; threats to sustainability were identified. Lessons learned included the importance of early course correction based on feedback, opportunities for communication, and building trust and a shared language. Conclusions: Partnerships develop through commitment and trust. Routine assessments and course correction may enable productive research partnerships.

AB - Background: Collaborations between community health and academic partners hold promise for improving community health through research. Objectives: To develop, implement, and evaluate a partnership to build capacity for community-based research. Methods: Development of the partnership was based on a participatory model that aimed to nurture strong infrastructure, clear communication, and trust between partners. Research training was individualized to assessed needs. Methods of evaluation included online surveys of partnership members comparing years 1 and 2 and appreciative inquiry (AI) interviews in year 3. Results and Lessons Learned: Course corrections from year 1 responses were implemented, and reflected in improvements on the second survey. Interviews highlighted mutual benefits of infrastructure developed in partnership; threats to sustainability were identified. Lessons learned included the importance of early course correction based on feedback, opportunities for communication, and building trust and a shared language. Conclusions: Partnerships develop through commitment and trust. Routine assessments and course correction may enable productive research partnerships.

KW - Access

KW - And evaluation

KW - Community health partnerships

KW - Community health research

KW - Evaluation studies

KW - Health care evaluation mechanisms

KW - Health care quality

KW - Process issues

KW - Program evaluation

KW - Quality of health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072745531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072745531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/cpr.2019.0055

DO - 10.1353/cpr.2019.0055

M3 - Article

C2 - 31564668

AN - SCOPUS:85072745531

VL - 13

SP - 273

EP - 282

JO - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

JF - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

SN - 1557-0541

IS - 3

ER -