BRInging the Diabetes prevention program to GEriatric populations (BRIDGE): A feasibility study

Jeannette M. Beasley, Lindsey Kirshner, Judith Wylie-Rosett, Mary Ann Sevick, Laura Deluca, Joshua Chodosh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this 6-week intervention was to test the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a telehealth-adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) at a senior center. Methods: Older adults (n = 16) attended weekly interactive webinars. At each measurement time point, participants completed questionnaires covering lifestyle, physical activity, quality of life, and food records and wore physical activity trackers. Qualitative data were gathered from 2 focus groups inviting all 16 participants with 13 and 10 participants attending, respectively. Results: Over 2000 senior center members were contacted, approximately 2% (n = 39) responded to the recruitment email, and 16 were recruited into the study. Retention was 75%, and attendance rates averaged 80% across the six intervention sessions. The focus group participants provided positive opinions for most program components, especially the webinar group interaction and using physical activity trackers. Suggestions for improvement included a greater focus on specific needs of older adults (i.e., adapting activities) and placing a greater emphasis on dietary strategies to prevent diabetes. Mean weight loss was 2.9% (2.7 kg [95% CI 1.6, 3.7]; p value = 0.001). Conclusion: The feasibility of providing DPP via webinar appears to be high based on the retention and attendance rates. Similar to other behavioral interventions engaging older adults, recruitment rates were low. Acceptability was evidenced by high attendance at the intervention sessions and feedback from participants during focus group sessions. The intervention efficacy should be evaluated based on CDC criteria for program recognition in a larger scale randomized trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number129
JournalPilot and Feasibility Studies
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 5 2019

Fingerprint

Feasibility Studies
Focus Groups
Senior Centers
Geriatrics
Population
Telemedicine
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Life Style
Weight Loss
Quality of Life
Food
Fitness Trackers

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Diabetes Prevention Program
  • Energy balance
  • Nutrition
  • Physical activity
  • Technology
  • Translation of evidence-based interventions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

BRInging the Diabetes prevention program to GEriatric populations (BRIDGE) : A feasibility study. / Beasley, Jeannette M.; Kirshner, Lindsey; Wylie-Rosett, Judith; Sevick, Mary Ann; Deluca, Laura; Chodosh, Joshua.

In: Pilot and Feasibility Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1, 129, 05.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beasley, Jeannette M. ; Kirshner, Lindsey ; Wylie-Rosett, Judith ; Sevick, Mary Ann ; Deluca, Laura ; Chodosh, Joshua. / BRInging the Diabetes prevention program to GEriatric populations (BRIDGE) : A feasibility study. In: Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2019 ; Vol. 5, No. 1.
@article{f3a8be75ae3d476d9616f868ef08dc7d,
title = "BRInging the Diabetes prevention program to GEriatric populations (BRIDGE): A feasibility study",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this 6-week intervention was to test the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a telehealth-adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) at a senior center. Methods: Older adults (n = 16) attended weekly interactive webinars. At each measurement time point, participants completed questionnaires covering lifestyle, physical activity, quality of life, and food records and wore physical activity trackers. Qualitative data were gathered from 2 focus groups inviting all 16 participants with 13 and 10 participants attending, respectively. Results: Over 2000 senior center members were contacted, approximately 2{\%} (n = 39) responded to the recruitment email, and 16 were recruited into the study. Retention was 75{\%}, and attendance rates averaged 80{\%} across the six intervention sessions. The focus group participants provided positive opinions for most program components, especially the webinar group interaction and using physical activity trackers. Suggestions for improvement included a greater focus on specific needs of older adults (i.e., adapting activities) and placing a greater emphasis on dietary strategies to prevent diabetes. Mean weight loss was 2.9{\%} (2.7 kg [95{\%} CI 1.6, 3.7]; p value = 0.001). Conclusion: The feasibility of providing DPP via webinar appears to be high based on the retention and attendance rates. Similar to other behavioral interventions engaging older adults, recruitment rates were low. Acceptability was evidenced by high attendance at the intervention sessions and feedback from participants during focus group sessions. The intervention efficacy should be evaluated based on CDC criteria for program recognition in a larger scale randomized trial.",
keywords = "Aging, Diabetes Prevention Program, Energy balance, Nutrition, Physical activity, Technology, Translation of evidence-based interventions",
author = "Beasley, {Jeannette M.} and Lindsey Kirshner and Judith Wylie-Rosett and Sevick, {Mary Ann} and Laura Deluca and Joshua Chodosh",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1186/s40814-019-0513-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Pilot and Feasibility Studies",
issn = "2055-5784",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - BRInging the Diabetes prevention program to GEriatric populations (BRIDGE)

T2 - A feasibility study

AU - Beasley, Jeannette M.

AU - Kirshner, Lindsey

AU - Wylie-Rosett, Judith

AU - Sevick, Mary Ann

AU - Deluca, Laura

AU - Chodosh, Joshua

PY - 2019/1/5

Y1 - 2019/1/5

N2 - Background: The purpose of this 6-week intervention was to test the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a telehealth-adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) at a senior center. Methods: Older adults (n = 16) attended weekly interactive webinars. At each measurement time point, participants completed questionnaires covering lifestyle, physical activity, quality of life, and food records and wore physical activity trackers. Qualitative data were gathered from 2 focus groups inviting all 16 participants with 13 and 10 participants attending, respectively. Results: Over 2000 senior center members were contacted, approximately 2% (n = 39) responded to the recruitment email, and 16 were recruited into the study. Retention was 75%, and attendance rates averaged 80% across the six intervention sessions. The focus group participants provided positive opinions for most program components, especially the webinar group interaction and using physical activity trackers. Suggestions for improvement included a greater focus on specific needs of older adults (i.e., adapting activities) and placing a greater emphasis on dietary strategies to prevent diabetes. Mean weight loss was 2.9% (2.7 kg [95% CI 1.6, 3.7]; p value = 0.001). Conclusion: The feasibility of providing DPP via webinar appears to be high based on the retention and attendance rates. Similar to other behavioral interventions engaging older adults, recruitment rates were low. Acceptability was evidenced by high attendance at the intervention sessions and feedback from participants during focus group sessions. The intervention efficacy should be evaluated based on CDC criteria for program recognition in a larger scale randomized trial.

AB - Background: The purpose of this 6-week intervention was to test the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a telehealth-adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) at a senior center. Methods: Older adults (n = 16) attended weekly interactive webinars. At each measurement time point, participants completed questionnaires covering lifestyle, physical activity, quality of life, and food records and wore physical activity trackers. Qualitative data were gathered from 2 focus groups inviting all 16 participants with 13 and 10 participants attending, respectively. Results: Over 2000 senior center members were contacted, approximately 2% (n = 39) responded to the recruitment email, and 16 were recruited into the study. Retention was 75%, and attendance rates averaged 80% across the six intervention sessions. The focus group participants provided positive opinions for most program components, especially the webinar group interaction and using physical activity trackers. Suggestions for improvement included a greater focus on specific needs of older adults (i.e., adapting activities) and placing a greater emphasis on dietary strategies to prevent diabetes. Mean weight loss was 2.9% (2.7 kg [95% CI 1.6, 3.7]; p value = 0.001). Conclusion: The feasibility of providing DPP via webinar appears to be high based on the retention and attendance rates. Similar to other behavioral interventions engaging older adults, recruitment rates were low. Acceptability was evidenced by high attendance at the intervention sessions and feedback from participants during focus group sessions. The intervention efficacy should be evaluated based on CDC criteria for program recognition in a larger scale randomized trial.

KW - Aging

KW - Diabetes Prevention Program

KW - Energy balance

KW - Nutrition

KW - Physical activity

KW - Technology

KW - Translation of evidence-based interventions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075123452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075123452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40814-019-0513-7

DO - 10.1186/s40814-019-0513-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075123452

VL - 5

JO - Pilot and Feasibility Studies

JF - Pilot and Feasibility Studies

SN - 2055-5784

IS - 1

M1 - 129

ER -