Body mass index and waist circumference in relation to lung cancer risk in the women's health initiative

Geoffrey C. Kabat, Mimi Kim, Julie R. Hunt, Rowan T. Chlebowski, Thomas E. Rohan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Investigators in several epidemiologic studies have observed an inverse association between body mass index (BMI) and lung cancer risk, while others have not. The authors used data from the Women's Health Initiative to study the association of anthropometric factors with lung cancer risk. Over 8 years of follow-up (1998-2006), 1,365 incident lung cancer cases were ascertained among 161,809 women. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios adjusted for covariates. Baseline BMI was inversely associated with lung cancer in current smokers (highest quintile vs. lowest: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42, 0.92). When BMI and waist circumference were mutually adjusted, BMI was inversely associated with lung cancer risk in both current smokers and former smokers (HR = 0.40 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.72) and HR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.94), respectively), and waist circumference was positively associated with risk (HR = 1.56 (95% CI: 0.91, 2.69) and HR = 1.50 (95% CI: 0.98, 2.31), respectively). In never smokers, height showed a borderline positive association with lung cancer. These findings suggest that in smokers, BMI is inversely associated with lung cancer risk and that waist circumference is positively associated with risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-169
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume168
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Waist Circumference
Women's Health
Lung Neoplasms
Body Mass Index
Confidence Intervals
Proportional Hazards Models
Epidemiologic Studies
Odds Ratio
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Adiposity
  • Body mass index
  • Body weight changes
  • Health status
  • Lung neoplasms
  • Smoking
  • Waist-hip ratio

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Body mass index and waist circumference in relation to lung cancer risk in the women's health initiative. / Kabat, Geoffrey C.; Kim, Mimi; Hunt, Julie R.; Chlebowski, Rowan T.; Rohan, Thomas E.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 168, No. 2, 07.2008, p. 158-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6991ddd53316488d98613051d400d8f7,
title = "Body mass index and waist circumference in relation to lung cancer risk in the women's health initiative",
abstract = "Investigators in several epidemiologic studies have observed an inverse association between body mass index (BMI) and lung cancer risk, while others have not. The authors used data from the Women's Health Initiative to study the association of anthropometric factors with lung cancer risk. Over 8 years of follow-up (1998-2006), 1,365 incident lung cancer cases were ascertained among 161,809 women. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios adjusted for covariates. Baseline BMI was inversely associated with lung cancer in current smokers (highest quintile vs. lowest: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.62, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI): 0.42, 0.92). When BMI and waist circumference were mutually adjusted, BMI was inversely associated with lung cancer risk in both current smokers and former smokers (HR = 0.40 (95{\%} CI: 0.22, 0.72) and HR = 0.61 (95{\%} CI: 0.40, 0.94), respectively), and waist circumference was positively associated with risk (HR = 1.56 (95{\%} CI: 0.91, 2.69) and HR = 1.50 (95{\%} CI: 0.98, 2.31), respectively). In never smokers, height showed a borderline positive association with lung cancer. These findings suggest that in smokers, BMI is inversely associated with lung cancer risk and that waist circumference is positively associated with risk.",
keywords = "Adiposity, Body mass index, Body weight changes, Health status, Lung neoplasms, Smoking, Waist-hip ratio",
author = "Kabat, {Geoffrey C.} and Mimi Kim and Hunt, {Julie R.} and Chlebowski, {Rowan T.} and Rohan, {Thomas E.}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kwn109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "168",
pages = "158--169",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Body mass index and waist circumference in relation to lung cancer risk in the women's health initiative

AU - Kabat, Geoffrey C.

AU - Kim, Mimi

AU - Hunt, Julie R.

AU - Chlebowski, Rowan T.

AU - Rohan, Thomas E.

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - Investigators in several epidemiologic studies have observed an inverse association between body mass index (BMI) and lung cancer risk, while others have not. The authors used data from the Women's Health Initiative to study the association of anthropometric factors with lung cancer risk. Over 8 years of follow-up (1998-2006), 1,365 incident lung cancer cases were ascertained among 161,809 women. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios adjusted for covariates. Baseline BMI was inversely associated with lung cancer in current smokers (highest quintile vs. lowest: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42, 0.92). When BMI and waist circumference were mutually adjusted, BMI was inversely associated with lung cancer risk in both current smokers and former smokers (HR = 0.40 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.72) and HR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.94), respectively), and waist circumference was positively associated with risk (HR = 1.56 (95% CI: 0.91, 2.69) and HR = 1.50 (95% CI: 0.98, 2.31), respectively). In never smokers, height showed a borderline positive association with lung cancer. These findings suggest that in smokers, BMI is inversely associated with lung cancer risk and that waist circumference is positively associated with risk.

AB - Investigators in several epidemiologic studies have observed an inverse association between body mass index (BMI) and lung cancer risk, while others have not. The authors used data from the Women's Health Initiative to study the association of anthropometric factors with lung cancer risk. Over 8 years of follow-up (1998-2006), 1,365 incident lung cancer cases were ascertained among 161,809 women. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios adjusted for covariates. Baseline BMI was inversely associated with lung cancer in current smokers (highest quintile vs. lowest: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42, 0.92). When BMI and waist circumference were mutually adjusted, BMI was inversely associated with lung cancer risk in both current smokers and former smokers (HR = 0.40 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.72) and HR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.94), respectively), and waist circumference was positively associated with risk (HR = 1.56 (95% CI: 0.91, 2.69) and HR = 1.50 (95% CI: 0.98, 2.31), respectively). In never smokers, height showed a borderline positive association with lung cancer. These findings suggest that in smokers, BMI is inversely associated with lung cancer risk and that waist circumference is positively associated with risk.

KW - Adiposity

KW - Body mass index

KW - Body weight changes

KW - Health status

KW - Lung neoplasms

KW - Smoking

KW - Waist-hip ratio

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46749109232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46749109232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwn109

DO - 10.1093/aje/kwn109

M3 - Article

C2 - 18483121

AN - SCOPUS:46749109232

VL - 168

SP - 158

EP - 169

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 2

ER -