Blame and its consequences for healthcare professionals: Response to Tigard

Elizabeth A. Duthie, Ian C. Fischer, Richard M. Frankel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Tigard (2019) suggests that the medical community would benefit from continuing to promote notions of individual responsibility and blame in healthcare settings. In particular, he contends that blame will promote systematic improvement, both on the individual and institutional levels, by increasing the likelihood that the blameworthy party will €own up' to his or her mistake and apologise. While we agree that communicating regret and offering a genuine apology are critical steps to take when addressing patient harm, the idea that medical professionals should continue to € take the blame' for medical errors flies in the face of existing science and threatens to do more harm than good. We contrast Dr Tigard's approach with the current literature on blame to promote an alternative strategy that may help to create lasting change in the face of unfortunate error.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Patient Harm
Medical Errors
Emotions
Delivery of Health Care
responsibility
science
community
Healthcare
literature
Harm

Keywords

  • applied and professional ethics
  • education for healthcare professionals
  • medical error

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Blame and its consequences for healthcare professionals : Response to Tigard. / Duthie, Elizabeth A.; Fischer, Ian C.; Frankel, Richard M.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a35b2e7c18f843e9bd8344834695db15,
title = "Blame and its consequences for healthcare professionals: Response to Tigard",
abstract = "Tigard (2019) suggests that the medical community would benefit from continuing to promote notions of individual responsibility and blame in healthcare settings. In particular, he contends that blame will promote systematic improvement, both on the individual and institutional levels, by increasing the likelihood that the blameworthy party will €own up' to his or her mistake and apologise. While we agree that communicating regret and offering a genuine apology are critical steps to take when addressing patient harm, the idea that medical professionals should continue to € take the blame' for medical errors flies in the face of existing science and threatens to do more harm than good. We contrast Dr Tigard's approach with the current literature on blame to promote an alternative strategy that may help to create lasting change in the face of unfortunate error.",
keywords = "applied and professional ethics, education for healthcare professionals, medical error",
author = "Duthie, {Elizabeth A.} and Fischer, {Ian C.} and Frankel, {Richard M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2019-105525",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blame and its consequences for healthcare professionals

T2 - Response to Tigard

AU - Duthie, Elizabeth A.

AU - Fischer, Ian C.

AU - Frankel, Richard M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Tigard (2019) suggests that the medical community would benefit from continuing to promote notions of individual responsibility and blame in healthcare settings. In particular, he contends that blame will promote systematic improvement, both on the individual and institutional levels, by increasing the likelihood that the blameworthy party will €own up' to his or her mistake and apologise. While we agree that communicating regret and offering a genuine apology are critical steps to take when addressing patient harm, the idea that medical professionals should continue to € take the blame' for medical errors flies in the face of existing science and threatens to do more harm than good. We contrast Dr Tigard's approach with the current literature on blame to promote an alternative strategy that may help to create lasting change in the face of unfortunate error.

AB - Tigard (2019) suggests that the medical community would benefit from continuing to promote notions of individual responsibility and blame in healthcare settings. In particular, he contends that blame will promote systematic improvement, both on the individual and institutional levels, by increasing the likelihood that the blameworthy party will €own up' to his or her mistake and apologise. While we agree that communicating regret and offering a genuine apology are critical steps to take when addressing patient harm, the idea that medical professionals should continue to € take the blame' for medical errors flies in the face of existing science and threatens to do more harm than good. We contrast Dr Tigard's approach with the current literature on blame to promote an alternative strategy that may help to create lasting change in the face of unfortunate error.

KW - applied and professional ethics

KW - education for healthcare professionals

KW - medical error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074326470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074326470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2019-105525

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2019-105525

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074326470

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

ER -