Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus extrapedicular vertebroplasty using polymethylmethacrylate

Serkan Erkan, Chunhui Wu, Amir A. Mehbod, Woojin Cho, Ensor E. Transfeldt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: An in vitro biomechanical study using osteoporotic cadaveric vertebrae. Objective: To compare the biomechanics of transpedicular and extrapedicular approaches in polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in terms of height restoration, strength, and stiffness. Summary Background Data: Cement is typically injected through a transpedicular approach in both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures. Previous biomechanical studies were primarily focused on the transpedicular approach. Extrapedicular approach has been recently developed to provide more symmetric cement filling and has good clinical results. However, no biomechanical data are available to compare these 2 techniques. Methods: Twenty-four osteoporotic vertebral bodies were randomly divided into 2 groups for either transpedicular or extrapedicular vertebroplasty. Six lumbar and 6 thoracic vertebrae were used for each group. Each vertebral body was compressed by 25% of its original height and its strength and stiffness were measured. The vertebral bodies were treated with polymethylmethacrylate using either transpedicular or extrapedicular approach. The height restoration was measured before the treated vertebrae were recompressed to determine posttreatment strength and stiffness. Results: Both techniques increased vertebral strength by approximately 50% of the intact strength. There was no statistical difference in posttreatment strength between these 2 techniques. However, the transpedicular technique had higher stiffness recovery (70% to 80%) from the intact stiffness than the extrapedicular technique (60%). The extrapedicular approach achieved greater height restoration in thoracic vertebrae. Conclusions: Both extrapedicular and transpedicular techniques increased strength but reduced stiffness compared with the intact condition. The extrapedicular technique achieved greater height restoration possibly attributed to its easier access to the fracture site. These biomechanical data provide useful information when selecting an approach for cement injection in vertebroplasty procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180-185
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vertebroplasty
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Thoracic Vertebrae
Spine
Kyphoplasty
Biomechanical Phenomena
Injections

Keywords

  • Compression fracture
  • Extrapedicular
  • Polymethylmethacrylate
  • Transpedicular
  • Vertebroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus extrapedicular vertebroplasty using polymethylmethacrylate. / Erkan, Serkan; Wu, Chunhui; Mehbod, Amir A.; Cho, Woojin; Transfeldt, Ensor E.

In: Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, Vol. 23, No. 3, 05.2010, p. 180-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Erkan, Serkan ; Wu, Chunhui ; Mehbod, Amir A. ; Cho, Woojin ; Transfeldt, Ensor E. / Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus extrapedicular vertebroplasty using polymethylmethacrylate. In: Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. 2010 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 180-185.
@article{3dc267745ef84cdeb68532b3361df5ab,
title = "Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus extrapedicular vertebroplasty using polymethylmethacrylate",
abstract = "Study Design: An in vitro biomechanical study using osteoporotic cadaveric vertebrae. Objective: To compare the biomechanics of transpedicular and extrapedicular approaches in polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in terms of height restoration, strength, and stiffness. Summary Background Data: Cement is typically injected through a transpedicular approach in both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures. Previous biomechanical studies were primarily focused on the transpedicular approach. Extrapedicular approach has been recently developed to provide more symmetric cement filling and has good clinical results. However, no biomechanical data are available to compare these 2 techniques. Methods: Twenty-four osteoporotic vertebral bodies were randomly divided into 2 groups for either transpedicular or extrapedicular vertebroplasty. Six lumbar and 6 thoracic vertebrae were used for each group. Each vertebral body was compressed by 25{\%} of its original height and its strength and stiffness were measured. The vertebral bodies were treated with polymethylmethacrylate using either transpedicular or extrapedicular approach. The height restoration was measured before the treated vertebrae were recompressed to determine posttreatment strength and stiffness. Results: Both techniques increased vertebral strength by approximately 50{\%} of the intact strength. There was no statistical difference in posttreatment strength between these 2 techniques. However, the transpedicular technique had higher stiffness recovery (70{\%} to 80{\%}) from the intact stiffness than the extrapedicular technique (60{\%}). The extrapedicular approach achieved greater height restoration in thoracic vertebrae. Conclusions: Both extrapedicular and transpedicular techniques increased strength but reduced stiffness compared with the intact condition. The extrapedicular technique achieved greater height restoration possibly attributed to its easier access to the fracture site. These biomechanical data provide useful information when selecting an approach for cement injection in vertebroplasty procedures.",
keywords = "Compression fracture, Extrapedicular, Polymethylmethacrylate, Transpedicular, Vertebroplasty",
author = "Serkan Erkan and Chunhui Wu and Mehbod, {Amir A.} and Woojin Cho and Transfeldt, {Ensor E.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819c48a4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "180--185",
journal = "Journal of Spinal Disorders",
issn = "1536-0652",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus extrapedicular vertebroplasty using polymethylmethacrylate

AU - Erkan, Serkan

AU - Wu, Chunhui

AU - Mehbod, Amir A.

AU - Cho, Woojin

AU - Transfeldt, Ensor E.

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Study Design: An in vitro biomechanical study using osteoporotic cadaveric vertebrae. Objective: To compare the biomechanics of transpedicular and extrapedicular approaches in polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in terms of height restoration, strength, and stiffness. Summary Background Data: Cement is typically injected through a transpedicular approach in both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures. Previous biomechanical studies were primarily focused on the transpedicular approach. Extrapedicular approach has been recently developed to provide more symmetric cement filling and has good clinical results. However, no biomechanical data are available to compare these 2 techniques. Methods: Twenty-four osteoporotic vertebral bodies were randomly divided into 2 groups for either transpedicular or extrapedicular vertebroplasty. Six lumbar and 6 thoracic vertebrae were used for each group. Each vertebral body was compressed by 25% of its original height and its strength and stiffness were measured. The vertebral bodies were treated with polymethylmethacrylate using either transpedicular or extrapedicular approach. The height restoration was measured before the treated vertebrae were recompressed to determine posttreatment strength and stiffness. Results: Both techniques increased vertebral strength by approximately 50% of the intact strength. There was no statistical difference in posttreatment strength between these 2 techniques. However, the transpedicular technique had higher stiffness recovery (70% to 80%) from the intact stiffness than the extrapedicular technique (60%). The extrapedicular approach achieved greater height restoration in thoracic vertebrae. Conclusions: Both extrapedicular and transpedicular techniques increased strength but reduced stiffness compared with the intact condition. The extrapedicular technique achieved greater height restoration possibly attributed to its easier access to the fracture site. These biomechanical data provide useful information when selecting an approach for cement injection in vertebroplasty procedures.

AB - Study Design: An in vitro biomechanical study using osteoporotic cadaveric vertebrae. Objective: To compare the biomechanics of transpedicular and extrapedicular approaches in polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in terms of height restoration, strength, and stiffness. Summary Background Data: Cement is typically injected through a transpedicular approach in both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures. Previous biomechanical studies were primarily focused on the transpedicular approach. Extrapedicular approach has been recently developed to provide more symmetric cement filling and has good clinical results. However, no biomechanical data are available to compare these 2 techniques. Methods: Twenty-four osteoporotic vertebral bodies were randomly divided into 2 groups for either transpedicular or extrapedicular vertebroplasty. Six lumbar and 6 thoracic vertebrae were used for each group. Each vertebral body was compressed by 25% of its original height and its strength and stiffness were measured. The vertebral bodies were treated with polymethylmethacrylate using either transpedicular or extrapedicular approach. The height restoration was measured before the treated vertebrae were recompressed to determine posttreatment strength and stiffness. Results: Both techniques increased vertebral strength by approximately 50% of the intact strength. There was no statistical difference in posttreatment strength between these 2 techniques. However, the transpedicular technique had higher stiffness recovery (70% to 80%) from the intact stiffness than the extrapedicular technique (60%). The extrapedicular approach achieved greater height restoration in thoracic vertebrae. Conclusions: Both extrapedicular and transpedicular techniques increased strength but reduced stiffness compared with the intact condition. The extrapedicular technique achieved greater height restoration possibly attributed to its easier access to the fracture site. These biomechanical data provide useful information when selecting an approach for cement injection in vertebroplasty procedures.

KW - Compression fracture

KW - Extrapedicular

KW - Polymethylmethacrylate

KW - Transpedicular

KW - Vertebroplasty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952168826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952168826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819c48a4

DO - 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819c48a4

M3 - Article

C2 - 20065863

AN - SCOPUS:77952168826

VL - 23

SP - 180

EP - 185

JO - Journal of Spinal Disorders

JF - Journal of Spinal Disorders

SN - 1536-0652

IS - 3

ER -