Biomechanical analysis of motion following sacroiliac joint fusion using lateral sacroiliac screws with or without lumbosacral instrumented fusion

Bruce E. Dall, Sonia V. Eden, Woojin Cho, Alexa Karkenny, Daina M. Brooks, Gerald M. Hayward, Mark Moldavsky, Soumya Yandamuri, Brandon S. Bucklen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Sacroiliac joint hypermobility or aberrant mechanics may be a source of pain. The purpose of this study was to assess sacroiliac joint range of motion after simulated adjacent lumbosacral instrumented fusion, with or without sacroiliac joint fusion, with lateral sacroiliac screws. Methods: In this in vitro biomechanical study, seven cadaveric specimens were tested on a six-degrees-of-freedom machine under load control. Left posterior sacroiliac joint ligaments were severed to maximize joint range of motion. Influence of lumbosacral instrumentation on sacroiliac joint motion, with or without fixation, was studied. Findings: During flexion-extension in the setting of posterior sacroiliac joint injury and L5–S1 fixation, sacroiliac joint range of motion increased to 195% of intact. After fixation with lateral sacroiliac screws, average range of motion reduced to 144% of intact motion. Sacroiliac joint screws thus partially stabilized the joint and reduced motion. Use of 6 bilateral sacroiliac joint screws with L5–S1 screw and rod fixation in lateral bending and axial rotation yielded the greatest reduction in range of motion. Without lumbosacral fixation, baseline motion of the sacroiliac joint was reduced, and sacroiliac joint screw alone, using either 2, 3, or 6 screws, was able to restore motion at or below the level of an intact joint. Interpretation: Sacroiliac joint ligament injury with existing lumbosacral fixation doubled sacroiliac joint range of motion, but thereafter, fixation with lateral sacroiliac screws decreased range of motion of the injured sacroiliac joint. Screw configuration played a minor role, but generally, 6 sacroiliac joint screws had the greatest motion reduction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)182-189
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Volume68
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Sacroiliac Joint
Articular Range of Motion
Ligaments
Joints
Joint Instability
Wounds and Injuries
Mechanics

Keywords

  • Lateral sacroiliac screws
  • Lumbosacral instrumented fusion
  • Range of motion
  • Sacroiliac joint
  • Sacroiliac joint fusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Biomechanical analysis of motion following sacroiliac joint fusion using lateral sacroiliac screws with or without lumbosacral instrumented fusion. / Dall, Bruce E.; Eden, Sonia V.; Cho, Woojin; Karkenny, Alexa; Brooks, Daina M.; Hayward, Gerald M.; Moldavsky, Mark; Yandamuri, Soumya; Bucklen, Brandon S.

In: Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 68, 01.08.2019, p. 182-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dall, Bruce E. ; Eden, Sonia V. ; Cho, Woojin ; Karkenny, Alexa ; Brooks, Daina M. ; Hayward, Gerald M. ; Moldavsky, Mark ; Yandamuri, Soumya ; Bucklen, Brandon S. / Biomechanical analysis of motion following sacroiliac joint fusion using lateral sacroiliac screws with or without lumbosacral instrumented fusion. In: Clinical Biomechanics. 2019 ; Vol. 68. pp. 182-189.
@article{7aa18615109f4bdb80b49397b9cf536a,
title = "Biomechanical analysis of motion following sacroiliac joint fusion using lateral sacroiliac screws with or without lumbosacral instrumented fusion",
abstract = "Background: Sacroiliac joint hypermobility or aberrant mechanics may be a source of pain. The purpose of this study was to assess sacroiliac joint range of motion after simulated adjacent lumbosacral instrumented fusion, with or without sacroiliac joint fusion, with lateral sacroiliac screws. Methods: In this in vitro biomechanical study, seven cadaveric specimens were tested on a six-degrees-of-freedom machine under load control. Left posterior sacroiliac joint ligaments were severed to maximize joint range of motion. Influence of lumbosacral instrumentation on sacroiliac joint motion, with or without fixation, was studied. Findings: During flexion-extension in the setting of posterior sacroiliac joint injury and L5–S1 fixation, sacroiliac joint range of motion increased to 195{\%} of intact. After fixation with lateral sacroiliac screws, average range of motion reduced to 144{\%} of intact motion. Sacroiliac joint screws thus partially stabilized the joint and reduced motion. Use of 6 bilateral sacroiliac joint screws with L5–S1 screw and rod fixation in lateral bending and axial rotation yielded the greatest reduction in range of motion. Without lumbosacral fixation, baseline motion of the sacroiliac joint was reduced, and sacroiliac joint screw alone, using either 2, 3, or 6 screws, was able to restore motion at or below the level of an intact joint. Interpretation: Sacroiliac joint ligament injury with existing lumbosacral fixation doubled sacroiliac joint range of motion, but thereafter, fixation with lateral sacroiliac screws decreased range of motion of the injured sacroiliac joint. Screw configuration played a minor role, but generally, 6 sacroiliac joint screws had the greatest motion reduction.",
keywords = "Lateral sacroiliac screws, Lumbosacral instrumented fusion, Range of motion, Sacroiliac joint, Sacroiliac joint fusion",
author = "Dall, {Bruce E.} and Eden, {Sonia V.} and Woojin Cho and Alexa Karkenny and Brooks, {Daina M.} and Hayward, {Gerald M.} and Mark Moldavsky and Soumya Yandamuri and Bucklen, {Brandon S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.05.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "182--189",
journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical analysis of motion following sacroiliac joint fusion using lateral sacroiliac screws with or without lumbosacral instrumented fusion

AU - Dall, Bruce E.

AU - Eden, Sonia V.

AU - Cho, Woojin

AU - Karkenny, Alexa

AU - Brooks, Daina M.

AU - Hayward, Gerald M.

AU - Moldavsky, Mark

AU - Yandamuri, Soumya

AU - Bucklen, Brandon S.

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Background: Sacroiliac joint hypermobility or aberrant mechanics may be a source of pain. The purpose of this study was to assess sacroiliac joint range of motion after simulated adjacent lumbosacral instrumented fusion, with or without sacroiliac joint fusion, with lateral sacroiliac screws. Methods: In this in vitro biomechanical study, seven cadaveric specimens were tested on a six-degrees-of-freedom machine under load control. Left posterior sacroiliac joint ligaments were severed to maximize joint range of motion. Influence of lumbosacral instrumentation on sacroiliac joint motion, with or without fixation, was studied. Findings: During flexion-extension in the setting of posterior sacroiliac joint injury and L5–S1 fixation, sacroiliac joint range of motion increased to 195% of intact. After fixation with lateral sacroiliac screws, average range of motion reduced to 144% of intact motion. Sacroiliac joint screws thus partially stabilized the joint and reduced motion. Use of 6 bilateral sacroiliac joint screws with L5–S1 screw and rod fixation in lateral bending and axial rotation yielded the greatest reduction in range of motion. Without lumbosacral fixation, baseline motion of the sacroiliac joint was reduced, and sacroiliac joint screw alone, using either 2, 3, or 6 screws, was able to restore motion at or below the level of an intact joint. Interpretation: Sacroiliac joint ligament injury with existing lumbosacral fixation doubled sacroiliac joint range of motion, but thereafter, fixation with lateral sacroiliac screws decreased range of motion of the injured sacroiliac joint. Screw configuration played a minor role, but generally, 6 sacroiliac joint screws had the greatest motion reduction.

AB - Background: Sacroiliac joint hypermobility or aberrant mechanics may be a source of pain. The purpose of this study was to assess sacroiliac joint range of motion after simulated adjacent lumbosacral instrumented fusion, with or without sacroiliac joint fusion, with lateral sacroiliac screws. Methods: In this in vitro biomechanical study, seven cadaveric specimens were tested on a six-degrees-of-freedom machine under load control. Left posterior sacroiliac joint ligaments were severed to maximize joint range of motion. Influence of lumbosacral instrumentation on sacroiliac joint motion, with or without fixation, was studied. Findings: During flexion-extension in the setting of posterior sacroiliac joint injury and L5–S1 fixation, sacroiliac joint range of motion increased to 195% of intact. After fixation with lateral sacroiliac screws, average range of motion reduced to 144% of intact motion. Sacroiliac joint screws thus partially stabilized the joint and reduced motion. Use of 6 bilateral sacroiliac joint screws with L5–S1 screw and rod fixation in lateral bending and axial rotation yielded the greatest reduction in range of motion. Without lumbosacral fixation, baseline motion of the sacroiliac joint was reduced, and sacroiliac joint screw alone, using either 2, 3, or 6 screws, was able to restore motion at or below the level of an intact joint. Interpretation: Sacroiliac joint ligament injury with existing lumbosacral fixation doubled sacroiliac joint range of motion, but thereafter, fixation with lateral sacroiliac screws decreased range of motion of the injured sacroiliac joint. Screw configuration played a minor role, but generally, 6 sacroiliac joint screws had the greatest motion reduction.

KW - Lateral sacroiliac screws

KW - Lumbosacral instrumented fusion

KW - Range of motion

KW - Sacroiliac joint

KW - Sacroiliac joint fusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067563583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067563583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.05.025

DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.05.025

M3 - Article

C2 - 31234032

AN - SCOPUS:85067563583

VL - 68

SP - 182

EP - 189

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

SN - 0268-0033

ER -