TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomarkers Predictive of Survival and Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma
AU - Rizk, Emanuelle M.
AU - Seffens, Angelina M.
AU - Trager, Megan H.
AU - Moore, Michael R.
AU - Geskin, Larisa J.
AU - Gartrell-Corrado, Robyn D.
AU - Wong, Winston
AU - Saenger, Yvonne M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors of this publication were supported by the National Institutes of Health through Grant Numbers R01FD006108 (Yvonne M. Saenger) and KL2TR001874 (Robyn D. Gartrell-Corrado). Yvonne M. Saenger is also supported by funding from the Melanoma Research Alliance and by an Irving Assistant Professorship at Columbia University’s NIH/NCATS CTSA Program hub: UL1TR001873. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Robyn D. Gartrell-Corrado is also supported by Swim Across America. Megan H. Trager is supported by the Dean’s Research Fellowship at Columbia. Angelina M. Seffens is supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Medical Student Fellowship. The funding sources had no role in the preparation of the manuscript or the decision to submit for publication.
Funding Information:
Emanuelle M. Rizk, Angelina M. Seffens, Megan H. Trager, and Michael R. Moore have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article. Emanuelle M. Rizk received travel funding to a conference from nanoString. Yvonne M. Saenger receives funding from Amgen and Regeneron. Robyn D. Gartrell-Corrado receives funding from nanoString and travel support and honoraria from Northwest Biotherapeutics and PerkinElmer. Larisa J. Geskin receives funding, honoraria, travel support, and royalties from Helsinn, Mallincrodt, Kyowa Kirin, Medivir, Medscape, and UpToDate. Larisa J. Geskin has also provided expert testimony to Medivir. None of these funding sources have impacted the content of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma. Targeting of the immune checkpoints cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and programmed cell death protein 1 has led to improved survival in a subset of patients. Unfortunately, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with significant side effects and many patients do not respond to treatment. Thus, there is an urgent need both for prognostic biomarkers to estimate risk and for predictive biomarkers to determine which patients are likely to respond to therapy. In this review, prognostic and predictive biomarkers that are an active area of research are outlined. Of note, certain transcriptomic signatures are already used in the clinic, albeit not routinely, to prognosticate patients. In the predictive setting, programmed cell death protein ligand 1 expression has been shown to correlate with benefit but is not precise enough to be used as an exclusionary biomarker. Future investigation will need to focus on biomarkers that are easily reproducible, cost effective, and accurate. The use of readily available clinical material, such as serum or hematoxylin and eosin-stained images, may offer one such path forward.
AB - Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma. Targeting of the immune checkpoints cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and programmed cell death protein 1 has led to improved survival in a subset of patients. Unfortunately, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with significant side effects and many patients do not respond to treatment. Thus, there is an urgent need both for prognostic biomarkers to estimate risk and for predictive biomarkers to determine which patients are likely to respond to therapy. In this review, prognostic and predictive biomarkers that are an active area of research are outlined. Of note, certain transcriptomic signatures are already used in the clinic, albeit not routinely, to prognosticate patients. In the predictive setting, programmed cell death protein ligand 1 expression has been shown to correlate with benefit but is not precise enough to be used as an exclusionary biomarker. Future investigation will need to focus on biomarkers that are easily reproducible, cost effective, and accurate. The use of readily available clinical material, such as serum or hematoxylin and eosin-stained images, may offer one such path forward.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074455879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074455879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40257-019-00475-1
DO - 10.1007/s40257-019-00475-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 31602560
AN - SCOPUS:85074455879
VL - 21
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
JF - American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
SN - 1175-0561
IS - 1
ER -