Biomarker-calibrated protein intake and bone health in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trials and observational study1-3

Jeannette M. Beasley, Andrea Z. LaCroix, Joseph C. Larson, Ying Huang, Marian L. Neuhouser, Lesley F. Tinker, Rebecca Jackson, Linda Snetselaar, Karen C. Johnson, Charles B. Eaton, Ross L. Prentice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The effects of dietary protein on bone health are controversial. Objective: We examined the relation between protein intake with fracture and bone mineral density (BMD) within the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). Design: This prospective analysis included 144,580 women aged 50-79 y at baseline in the WHI clinical trials (CTs) and observational study (OS) that recruited participants in 1993-1998 with follow-up through 2011. Self-reported clinical fractures were collected semiannually through the original end of the trials (WHI CTs) and annually (WHI OS) by questionnaires. Hip fracture was adjudicated by a central review of radiology reports. BMDs for total body, hip, and spine were measured at baseline and 3 and 6 y in 9062 women at 3 WHI clinics by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Protein intake was assessed via food-frequency questionnaire and calibrated by using biomarkers of energy and protein intakes. Associations between protein intake and fracture were estimated by using Cox proportional hazards regression, and the relation between protein intake and BMD was estimated by using linear regression. Results: Median biomarker-calibrated protein intake was 15% of energy intake. Per 20% increase in calibrated protein intake (percentage of energy), there was no significant association with total fracture (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.02) or hip fracture (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.00), but there was an inverse association with forearm fracture (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.98). Each 20% increase in calibrated protein intake was associated with a significantly higher BMD for total body (mean 3-y change: 0.003 g/cm2; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.005 g/cm2) and hip (mean 3-y change: 0.002 g/cm2; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.004 g/cm2). Conclusions: Higher biomarker-calibrated protein intake within the range of usual intake was inversely associated with forearm fracture and was associated with better maintenance of total and hip BMDs. These data suggest higher protein intake is not detrimental to bone health in postmenopausal women. The WHI program was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00000611.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)934-940
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume99
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2014

Fingerprint

Women's Health
Biomarkers
Clinical Trials
Bone and Bones
Health
Proteins
Energy Intake
Bone Density
Hip
Hip Fractures
Forearm
Observational Studies
Dietary Proteins
Photon Absorptiometry
Radiology
Linear Models
Spine
Maintenance
Food

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Beasley, J. M., LaCroix, A. Z., Larson, J. C., Huang, Y., Neuhouser, M. L., Tinker, L. F., ... Prentice, R. L. (2014). Biomarker-calibrated protein intake and bone health in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trials and observational study1-3 American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99(4), 934-940. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.076786

Biomarker-calibrated protein intake and bone health in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trials and observational study1-3 . / Beasley, Jeannette M.; LaCroix, Andrea Z.; Larson, Joseph C.; Huang, Ying; Neuhouser, Marian L.; Tinker, Lesley F.; Jackson, Rebecca; Snetselaar, Linda; Johnson, Karen C.; Eaton, Charles B.; Prentice, Ross L.

In: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 99, No. 4, 01.04.2014, p. 934-940.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beasley, JM, LaCroix, AZ, Larson, JC, Huang, Y, Neuhouser, ML, Tinker, LF, Jackson, R, Snetselaar, L, Johnson, KC, Eaton, CB & Prentice, RL 2014, 'Biomarker-calibrated protein intake and bone health in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trials and observational study1-3 ', American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 934-940. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.076786
Beasley, Jeannette M. ; LaCroix, Andrea Z. ; Larson, Joseph C. ; Huang, Ying ; Neuhouser, Marian L. ; Tinker, Lesley F. ; Jackson, Rebecca ; Snetselaar, Linda ; Johnson, Karen C. ; Eaton, Charles B. ; Prentice, Ross L. / Biomarker-calibrated protein intake and bone health in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trials and observational study1-3 In: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2014 ; Vol. 99, No. 4. pp. 934-940.
@article{6eada1076a894f6b84ba8cbfdfccee16,
title = "Biomarker-calibrated protein intake and bone health in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trials and observational study1-3",
abstract = "Background: The effects of dietary protein on bone health are controversial. Objective: We examined the relation between protein intake with fracture and bone mineral density (BMD) within the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). Design: This prospective analysis included 144,580 women aged 50-79 y at baseline in the WHI clinical trials (CTs) and observational study (OS) that recruited participants in 1993-1998 with follow-up through 2011. Self-reported clinical fractures were collected semiannually through the original end of the trials (WHI CTs) and annually (WHI OS) by questionnaires. Hip fracture was adjudicated by a central review of radiology reports. BMDs for total body, hip, and spine were measured at baseline and 3 and 6 y in 9062 women at 3 WHI clinics by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Protein intake was assessed via food-frequency questionnaire and calibrated by using biomarkers of energy and protein intakes. Associations between protein intake and fracture were estimated by using Cox proportional hazards regression, and the relation between protein intake and BMD was estimated by using linear regression. Results: Median biomarker-calibrated protein intake was 15{\%} of energy intake. Per 20{\%} increase in calibrated protein intake (percentage of energy), there was no significant association with total fracture (HR: 0.99; 95{\%} CI: 0.97, 1.02) or hip fracture (HR: 0.91; 95{\%} CI: 0.84, 1.00), but there was an inverse association with forearm fracture (HR: 0.93; 95{\%} CI: 0.88, 0.98). Each 20{\%} increase in calibrated protein intake was associated with a significantly higher BMD for total body (mean 3-y change: 0.003 g/cm2; 95{\%} CI: 0.001, 0.005 g/cm2) and hip (mean 3-y change: 0.002 g/cm2; 95{\%} CI: 0.001, 0.004 g/cm2). Conclusions: Higher biomarker-calibrated protein intake within the range of usual intake was inversely associated with forearm fracture and was associated with better maintenance of total and hip BMDs. These data suggest higher protein intake is not detrimental to bone health in postmenopausal women. The WHI program was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00000611.",
author = "Beasley, {Jeannette M.} and LaCroix, {Andrea Z.} and Larson, {Joseph C.} and Ying Huang and Neuhouser, {Marian L.} and Tinker, {Lesley F.} and Rebecca Jackson and Linda Snetselaar and Johnson, {Karen C.} and Eaton, {Charles B.} and Prentice, {Ross L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3945/ajcn.113.076786",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "934--940",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0002-9165",
publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomarker-calibrated protein intake and bone health in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trials and observational study1-3

AU - Beasley, Jeannette M.

AU - LaCroix, Andrea Z.

AU - Larson, Joseph C.

AU - Huang, Ying

AU - Neuhouser, Marian L.

AU - Tinker, Lesley F.

AU - Jackson, Rebecca

AU - Snetselaar, Linda

AU - Johnson, Karen C.

AU - Eaton, Charles B.

AU - Prentice, Ross L.

PY - 2014/4/1

Y1 - 2014/4/1

N2 - Background: The effects of dietary protein on bone health are controversial. Objective: We examined the relation between protein intake with fracture and bone mineral density (BMD) within the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). Design: This prospective analysis included 144,580 women aged 50-79 y at baseline in the WHI clinical trials (CTs) and observational study (OS) that recruited participants in 1993-1998 with follow-up through 2011. Self-reported clinical fractures were collected semiannually through the original end of the trials (WHI CTs) and annually (WHI OS) by questionnaires. Hip fracture was adjudicated by a central review of radiology reports. BMDs for total body, hip, and spine were measured at baseline and 3 and 6 y in 9062 women at 3 WHI clinics by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Protein intake was assessed via food-frequency questionnaire and calibrated by using biomarkers of energy and protein intakes. Associations between protein intake and fracture were estimated by using Cox proportional hazards regression, and the relation between protein intake and BMD was estimated by using linear regression. Results: Median biomarker-calibrated protein intake was 15% of energy intake. Per 20% increase in calibrated protein intake (percentage of energy), there was no significant association with total fracture (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.02) or hip fracture (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.00), but there was an inverse association with forearm fracture (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.98). Each 20% increase in calibrated protein intake was associated with a significantly higher BMD for total body (mean 3-y change: 0.003 g/cm2; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.005 g/cm2) and hip (mean 3-y change: 0.002 g/cm2; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.004 g/cm2). Conclusions: Higher biomarker-calibrated protein intake within the range of usual intake was inversely associated with forearm fracture and was associated with better maintenance of total and hip BMDs. These data suggest higher protein intake is not detrimental to bone health in postmenopausal women. The WHI program was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00000611.

AB - Background: The effects of dietary protein on bone health are controversial. Objective: We examined the relation between protein intake with fracture and bone mineral density (BMD) within the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). Design: This prospective analysis included 144,580 women aged 50-79 y at baseline in the WHI clinical trials (CTs) and observational study (OS) that recruited participants in 1993-1998 with follow-up through 2011. Self-reported clinical fractures were collected semiannually through the original end of the trials (WHI CTs) and annually (WHI OS) by questionnaires. Hip fracture was adjudicated by a central review of radiology reports. BMDs for total body, hip, and spine were measured at baseline and 3 and 6 y in 9062 women at 3 WHI clinics by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Protein intake was assessed via food-frequency questionnaire and calibrated by using biomarkers of energy and protein intakes. Associations between protein intake and fracture were estimated by using Cox proportional hazards regression, and the relation between protein intake and BMD was estimated by using linear regression. Results: Median biomarker-calibrated protein intake was 15% of energy intake. Per 20% increase in calibrated protein intake (percentage of energy), there was no significant association with total fracture (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.02) or hip fracture (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.00), but there was an inverse association with forearm fracture (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.98). Each 20% increase in calibrated protein intake was associated with a significantly higher BMD for total body (mean 3-y change: 0.003 g/cm2; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.005 g/cm2) and hip (mean 3-y change: 0.002 g/cm2; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.004 g/cm2). Conclusions: Higher biomarker-calibrated protein intake within the range of usual intake was inversely associated with forearm fracture and was associated with better maintenance of total and hip BMDs. These data suggest higher protein intake is not detrimental to bone health in postmenopausal women. The WHI program was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00000611.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896932347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896932347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3945/ajcn.113.076786

DO - 10.3945/ajcn.113.076786

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 934

EP - 940

JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0002-9165

IS - 4

ER -