Biological impact of geometric uncertainties

What margin is needed for intra-hepatic tumors?

Hsiang-Chi Kuo, Wen Shan Liu, Andrew Wu, Dennis Mah, Keh Shih Chuang, Linda Hong, Ravindra Yaparpalvi, Chandan Guha, Shalom Kalnicki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To evaluate and compare the biological impact on different proposed margin recipes for the same geometric uncertainties for intra-hepatic tumors with different tumor cell types or clinical stages.Method: Three different margin recipes based on tumor motion were applied to sixteen IMRT plans with a total of twenty two intra-hepatic tumors. One recipe used the full amplitude of motion measured from patients to generate margins. A second used 70% of the full amplitude of motion, while the third had no margin for motion. The biological effects of geometric uncertainty in these three situations were evaluated with Equivalent Uniform Doses (EUD) for various survival fractions at 2 Gy (SF2).Results: There was no significant difference in the biological impact between the full motion margin and the 70% motion margin. Also, there was no significant difference between different tumor cell types. When the margin for motion was eliminated, the difference of the biological impact was significant among different cell types due to geometric uncertainties. Elimination of the motion margin requires dose escalation to compensate for the biological dose reduction due to the geometric misses during treatment.Conclusions: Both patient-based margins of full motion and of 70% motion are sufficient to prevent serious dosimetric error. Clinical implementation of margin reduction should consider the tumor sensitivity to radiation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number48
JournalRadiation Oncology
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 3 2010

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Liver
Neoplasms
Radiation Tolerance
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Biological impact of geometric uncertainties : What margin is needed for intra-hepatic tumors? / Kuo, Hsiang-Chi; Liu, Wen Shan; Wu, Andrew; Mah, Dennis; Chuang, Keh Shih; Hong, Linda; Yaparpalvi, Ravindra; Guha, Chandan; Kalnicki, Shalom.

In: Radiation Oncology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 48, 03.06.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d0989fbed114c238ad52fc660657531,
title = "Biological impact of geometric uncertainties: What margin is needed for intra-hepatic tumors?",
abstract = "Background: To evaluate and compare the biological impact on different proposed margin recipes for the same geometric uncertainties for intra-hepatic tumors with different tumor cell types or clinical stages.Method: Three different margin recipes based on tumor motion were applied to sixteen IMRT plans with a total of twenty two intra-hepatic tumors. One recipe used the full amplitude of motion measured from patients to generate margins. A second used 70{\%} of the full amplitude of motion, while the third had no margin for motion. The biological effects of geometric uncertainty in these three situations were evaluated with Equivalent Uniform Doses (EUD) for various survival fractions at 2 Gy (SF2).Results: There was no significant difference in the biological impact between the full motion margin and the 70{\%} motion margin. Also, there was no significant difference between different tumor cell types. When the margin for motion was eliminated, the difference of the biological impact was significant among different cell types due to geometric uncertainties. Elimination of the motion margin requires dose escalation to compensate for the biological dose reduction due to the geometric misses during treatment.Conclusions: Both patient-based margins of full motion and of 70{\%} motion are sufficient to prevent serious dosimetric error. Clinical implementation of margin reduction should consider the tumor sensitivity to radiation.",
author = "Hsiang-Chi Kuo and Liu, {Wen Shan} and Andrew Wu and Dennis Mah and Chuang, {Keh Shih} and Linda Hong and Ravindra Yaparpalvi and Chandan Guha and Shalom Kalnicki",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1186/1748-717X-5-48",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Radiation Oncology",
issn = "1748-717X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biological impact of geometric uncertainties

T2 - What margin is needed for intra-hepatic tumors?

AU - Kuo, Hsiang-Chi

AU - Liu, Wen Shan

AU - Wu, Andrew

AU - Mah, Dennis

AU - Chuang, Keh Shih

AU - Hong, Linda

AU - Yaparpalvi, Ravindra

AU - Guha, Chandan

AU - Kalnicki, Shalom

PY - 2010/6/3

Y1 - 2010/6/3

N2 - Background: To evaluate and compare the biological impact on different proposed margin recipes for the same geometric uncertainties for intra-hepatic tumors with different tumor cell types or clinical stages.Method: Three different margin recipes based on tumor motion were applied to sixteen IMRT plans with a total of twenty two intra-hepatic tumors. One recipe used the full amplitude of motion measured from patients to generate margins. A second used 70% of the full amplitude of motion, while the third had no margin for motion. The biological effects of geometric uncertainty in these three situations were evaluated with Equivalent Uniform Doses (EUD) for various survival fractions at 2 Gy (SF2).Results: There was no significant difference in the biological impact between the full motion margin and the 70% motion margin. Also, there was no significant difference between different tumor cell types. When the margin for motion was eliminated, the difference of the biological impact was significant among different cell types due to geometric uncertainties. Elimination of the motion margin requires dose escalation to compensate for the biological dose reduction due to the geometric misses during treatment.Conclusions: Both patient-based margins of full motion and of 70% motion are sufficient to prevent serious dosimetric error. Clinical implementation of margin reduction should consider the tumor sensitivity to radiation.

AB - Background: To evaluate and compare the biological impact on different proposed margin recipes for the same geometric uncertainties for intra-hepatic tumors with different tumor cell types or clinical stages.Method: Three different margin recipes based on tumor motion were applied to sixteen IMRT plans with a total of twenty two intra-hepatic tumors. One recipe used the full amplitude of motion measured from patients to generate margins. A second used 70% of the full amplitude of motion, while the third had no margin for motion. The biological effects of geometric uncertainty in these three situations were evaluated with Equivalent Uniform Doses (EUD) for various survival fractions at 2 Gy (SF2).Results: There was no significant difference in the biological impact between the full motion margin and the 70% motion margin. Also, there was no significant difference between different tumor cell types. When the margin for motion was eliminated, the difference of the biological impact was significant among different cell types due to geometric uncertainties. Elimination of the motion margin requires dose escalation to compensate for the biological dose reduction due to the geometric misses during treatment.Conclusions: Both patient-based margins of full motion and of 70% motion are sufficient to prevent serious dosimetric error. Clinical implementation of margin reduction should consider the tumor sensitivity to radiation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952979919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952979919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1748-717X-5-48

DO - 10.1186/1748-717X-5-48

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Radiation Oncology

JF - Radiation Oncology

SN - 1748-717X

IS - 1

M1 - 48

ER -