Biofeedback training for lower urinary tract symptoms: Factors affecting efficacy

Beth A. Drzewiecki, Pamela R. Kelly, Barbara Marinaccio, Joseph G. Borer, Carlos R. Estrada, Richard S. Lee, Stuart B. Bauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Biofeedback therapy is a valuable modality in children with dysfunctional voiding. However, it is unclear what factors contribute to the outcome. To define who may or may not benefit from biofeedback therapy we reviewed our experience with this treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 77 children referred between July 2005 and September 2008 for biofeedback therapy. An MR 20 Synergy trainer (Prometheus Group, Dover, New Hampshire) provided nonanimated and animated biofeedback. Uroflowmetry was performed at the start and end of each session. A total of 67 females and 10 males with a mean age of 9.0 years (range 4.8 to 18.2) comprised the cohort group. The primary referral diagnosis was nonfebrile urinary tract infection in 52 patients (67.5%), daytime and nighttime wetting in 47 (61%), voiding postponement in 14 (18.2%) and daytime incontinence in 10 (13%). Children were categorized by an outcome of success, improvement or failure. Results were analyzed using the chi-square, Fisher exact probability and Student t tests. Results: Success, improvement and failure were achieved in 22 (26.8%), 29 (37.7%) and 26 cases (33.7%), respectively. Age and gender were not statistically significant predictors of outcome. A median of 3.0 sessions (range 1 to 8) was administered. Children with 3 or greater sessions were more likely to succeed (p <0.005). The improvement in urinary tract infections was statistically significant (p <0.001). Of 37 children 20 (54%) transformed a staccato voiding pattern to a normal one on uroflowmetry. Conclusions: Biofeedback therapy can be effective in children with dysfunctional voiding and urinary tract infection. Children with a staccato voiding pattern may require a minimum of 3 visits to improve the voiding pattern. Children who complete 3 sessions are more likely to succeed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2050-2055
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume182
Issue number4 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Urinary Tract Infections
Diurnal Enuresis
Therapeutics
Biofeedback (Psychology)
Referral and Consultation
Students

Keywords

  • Biofeedback (psychology)
  • Urinary bladder
  • Urinary incontinence
  • Urinary tract infections
  • Urodynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Drzewiecki, B. A., Kelly, P. R., Marinaccio, B., Borer, J. G., Estrada, C. R., Lee, R. S., & Bauer, S. B. (2009). Biofeedback training for lower urinary tract symptoms: Factors affecting efficacy. Journal of Urology, 182(4 SUPPL.), 2050-2055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.003

Biofeedback training for lower urinary tract symptoms : Factors affecting efficacy. / Drzewiecki, Beth A.; Kelly, Pamela R.; Marinaccio, Barbara; Borer, Joseph G.; Estrada, Carlos R.; Lee, Richard S.; Bauer, Stuart B.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 182, No. 4 SUPPL., 10.2009, p. 2050-2055.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Drzewiecki, BA, Kelly, PR, Marinaccio, B, Borer, JG, Estrada, CR, Lee, RS & Bauer, SB 2009, 'Biofeedback training for lower urinary tract symptoms: Factors affecting efficacy', Journal of Urology, vol. 182, no. 4 SUPPL., pp. 2050-2055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.003
Drzewiecki, Beth A. ; Kelly, Pamela R. ; Marinaccio, Barbara ; Borer, Joseph G. ; Estrada, Carlos R. ; Lee, Richard S. ; Bauer, Stuart B. / Biofeedback training for lower urinary tract symptoms : Factors affecting efficacy. In: Journal of Urology. 2009 ; Vol. 182, No. 4 SUPPL. pp. 2050-2055.
@article{e7663b06ecf44033aa3bba04066b9da0,
title = "Biofeedback training for lower urinary tract symptoms: Factors affecting efficacy",
abstract = "Purpose: Biofeedback therapy is a valuable modality in children with dysfunctional voiding. However, it is unclear what factors contribute to the outcome. To define who may or may not benefit from biofeedback therapy we reviewed our experience with this treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 77 children referred between July 2005 and September 2008 for biofeedback therapy. An MR 20 Synergy trainer (Prometheus Group, Dover, New Hampshire) provided nonanimated and animated biofeedback. Uroflowmetry was performed at the start and end of each session. A total of 67 females and 10 males with a mean age of 9.0 years (range 4.8 to 18.2) comprised the cohort group. The primary referral diagnosis was nonfebrile urinary tract infection in 52 patients (67.5{\%}), daytime and nighttime wetting in 47 (61{\%}), voiding postponement in 14 (18.2{\%}) and daytime incontinence in 10 (13{\%}). Children were categorized by an outcome of success, improvement or failure. Results were analyzed using the chi-square, Fisher exact probability and Student t tests. Results: Success, improvement and failure were achieved in 22 (26.8{\%}), 29 (37.7{\%}) and 26 cases (33.7{\%}), respectively. Age and gender were not statistically significant predictors of outcome. A median of 3.0 sessions (range 1 to 8) was administered. Children with 3 or greater sessions were more likely to succeed (p <0.005). The improvement in urinary tract infections was statistically significant (p <0.001). Of 37 children 20 (54{\%}) transformed a staccato voiding pattern to a normal one on uroflowmetry. Conclusions: Biofeedback therapy can be effective in children with dysfunctional voiding and urinary tract infection. Children with a staccato voiding pattern may require a minimum of 3 visits to improve the voiding pattern. Children who complete 3 sessions are more likely to succeed.",
keywords = "Biofeedback (psychology), Urinary bladder, Urinary incontinence, Urinary tract infections, Urodynamics",
author = "Drzewiecki, {Beth A.} and Kelly, {Pamela R.} and Barbara Marinaccio and Borer, {Joseph G.} and Estrada, {Carlos R.} and Lee, {Richard S.} and Bauer, {Stuart B.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "182",
pages = "2050--2055",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biofeedback training for lower urinary tract symptoms

T2 - Factors affecting efficacy

AU - Drzewiecki, Beth A.

AU - Kelly, Pamela R.

AU - Marinaccio, Barbara

AU - Borer, Joseph G.

AU - Estrada, Carlos R.

AU - Lee, Richard S.

AU - Bauer, Stuart B.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Purpose: Biofeedback therapy is a valuable modality in children with dysfunctional voiding. However, it is unclear what factors contribute to the outcome. To define who may or may not benefit from biofeedback therapy we reviewed our experience with this treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 77 children referred between July 2005 and September 2008 for biofeedback therapy. An MR 20 Synergy trainer (Prometheus Group, Dover, New Hampshire) provided nonanimated and animated biofeedback. Uroflowmetry was performed at the start and end of each session. A total of 67 females and 10 males with a mean age of 9.0 years (range 4.8 to 18.2) comprised the cohort group. The primary referral diagnosis was nonfebrile urinary tract infection in 52 patients (67.5%), daytime and nighttime wetting in 47 (61%), voiding postponement in 14 (18.2%) and daytime incontinence in 10 (13%). Children were categorized by an outcome of success, improvement or failure. Results were analyzed using the chi-square, Fisher exact probability and Student t tests. Results: Success, improvement and failure were achieved in 22 (26.8%), 29 (37.7%) and 26 cases (33.7%), respectively. Age and gender were not statistically significant predictors of outcome. A median of 3.0 sessions (range 1 to 8) was administered. Children with 3 or greater sessions were more likely to succeed (p <0.005). The improvement in urinary tract infections was statistically significant (p <0.001). Of 37 children 20 (54%) transformed a staccato voiding pattern to a normal one on uroflowmetry. Conclusions: Biofeedback therapy can be effective in children with dysfunctional voiding and urinary tract infection. Children with a staccato voiding pattern may require a minimum of 3 visits to improve the voiding pattern. Children who complete 3 sessions are more likely to succeed.

AB - Purpose: Biofeedback therapy is a valuable modality in children with dysfunctional voiding. However, it is unclear what factors contribute to the outcome. To define who may or may not benefit from biofeedback therapy we reviewed our experience with this treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 77 children referred between July 2005 and September 2008 for biofeedback therapy. An MR 20 Synergy trainer (Prometheus Group, Dover, New Hampshire) provided nonanimated and animated biofeedback. Uroflowmetry was performed at the start and end of each session. A total of 67 females and 10 males with a mean age of 9.0 years (range 4.8 to 18.2) comprised the cohort group. The primary referral diagnosis was nonfebrile urinary tract infection in 52 patients (67.5%), daytime and nighttime wetting in 47 (61%), voiding postponement in 14 (18.2%) and daytime incontinence in 10 (13%). Children were categorized by an outcome of success, improvement or failure. Results were analyzed using the chi-square, Fisher exact probability and Student t tests. Results: Success, improvement and failure were achieved in 22 (26.8%), 29 (37.7%) and 26 cases (33.7%), respectively. Age and gender were not statistically significant predictors of outcome. A median of 3.0 sessions (range 1 to 8) was administered. Children with 3 or greater sessions were more likely to succeed (p <0.005). The improvement in urinary tract infections was statistically significant (p <0.001). Of 37 children 20 (54%) transformed a staccato voiding pattern to a normal one on uroflowmetry. Conclusions: Biofeedback therapy can be effective in children with dysfunctional voiding and urinary tract infection. Children with a staccato voiding pattern may require a minimum of 3 visits to improve the voiding pattern. Children who complete 3 sessions are more likely to succeed.

KW - Biofeedback (psychology)

KW - Urinary bladder

KW - Urinary incontinence

KW - Urinary tract infections

KW - Urodynamics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350490281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350490281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 19695584

AN - SCOPUS:70350490281

VL - 182

SP - 2050

EP - 2055

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4 SUPPL.

ER -