Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans: Demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias

David B. Allison, Jose R. Fernandez, Moonseong Heo, Shankuan Zhu, Carol Etzel, T. Mark Beasley, Christopher I. Amos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An attractive feature of variance-components methods (including the Haseman-Elston tests) for the detection of quantitative-trait loci (QTL) is that these methods provide estimates of the QTL effect. However, estimates that are obtained by commonly used methods can be biased for several reasons. Perhaps the largest source of bias is the selection process. Generally, QTL effects are reported only at locations where statistically significant results are obtained. This conditional reporting can lead to a marked upward bias. In this article, we demonstrate this bias and show that its magnitude can be large. We then present a simple method-of-moments (MOM)-based procedure to obtain more-accurate estimates, and we demonstrate its validity via Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, limitations of the MOM approach are noted, and we discuss some alternative procedures that may also reduce bias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)575-585
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Genetics
Volume70
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quantitative Trait Loci
Genome
Selection Bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics

Cite this

Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans : Demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias. / Allison, David B.; Fernandez, Jose R.; Heo, Moonseong; Zhu, Shankuan; Etzel, Carol; Beasley, T. Mark; Amos, Christopher I.

In: American Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 70, No. 3, 2002, p. 575-585.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Allison, David B. ; Fernandez, Jose R. ; Heo, Moonseong ; Zhu, Shankuan ; Etzel, Carol ; Beasley, T. Mark ; Amos, Christopher I. / Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans : Demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias. In: American Journal of Human Genetics. 2002 ; Vol. 70, No. 3. pp. 575-585.
@article{d45bca100eff477db9c3db4744d59934,
title = "Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans: Demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias",
abstract = "An attractive feature of variance-components methods (including the Haseman-Elston tests) for the detection of quantitative-trait loci (QTL) is that these methods provide estimates of the QTL effect. However, estimates that are obtained by commonly used methods can be biased for several reasons. Perhaps the largest source of bias is the selection process. Generally, QTL effects are reported only at locations where statistically significant results are obtained. This conditional reporting can lead to a marked upward bias. In this article, we demonstrate this bias and show that its magnitude can be large. We then present a simple method-of-moments (MOM)-based procedure to obtain more-accurate estimates, and we demonstrate its validity via Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, limitations of the MOM approach are noted, and we discuss some alternative procedures that may also reduce bias.",
author = "Allison, {David B.} and Fernandez, {Jose R.} and Moonseong Heo and Shankuan Zhu and Carol Etzel and Beasley, {T. Mark} and Amos, {Christopher I.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1086/339273",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "575--585",
journal = "American Journal of Human Genetics",
issn = "0002-9297",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans

T2 - Demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias

AU - Allison, David B.

AU - Fernandez, Jose R.

AU - Heo, Moonseong

AU - Zhu, Shankuan

AU - Etzel, Carol

AU - Beasley, T. Mark

AU - Amos, Christopher I.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - An attractive feature of variance-components methods (including the Haseman-Elston tests) for the detection of quantitative-trait loci (QTL) is that these methods provide estimates of the QTL effect. However, estimates that are obtained by commonly used methods can be biased for several reasons. Perhaps the largest source of bias is the selection process. Generally, QTL effects are reported only at locations where statistically significant results are obtained. This conditional reporting can lead to a marked upward bias. In this article, we demonstrate this bias and show that its magnitude can be large. We then present a simple method-of-moments (MOM)-based procedure to obtain more-accurate estimates, and we demonstrate its validity via Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, limitations of the MOM approach are noted, and we discuss some alternative procedures that may also reduce bias.

AB - An attractive feature of variance-components methods (including the Haseman-Elston tests) for the detection of quantitative-trait loci (QTL) is that these methods provide estimates of the QTL effect. However, estimates that are obtained by commonly used methods can be biased for several reasons. Perhaps the largest source of bias is the selection process. Generally, QTL effects are reported only at locations where statistically significant results are obtained. This conditional reporting can lead to a marked upward bias. In this article, we demonstrate this bias and show that its magnitude can be large. We then present a simple method-of-moments (MOM)-based procedure to obtain more-accurate estimates, and we demonstrate its validity via Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, limitations of the MOM approach are noted, and we discuss some alternative procedures that may also reduce bias.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036178196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036178196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/339273

DO - 10.1086/339273

M3 - Article

C2 - 11836648

AN - SCOPUS:0036178196

VL - 70

SP - 575

EP - 585

JO - American Journal of Human Genetics

JF - American Journal of Human Genetics

SN - 0002-9297

IS - 3

ER -