Barriers and enablers to becoming abortion providers: The reproductive health program

Megan Greenberg, Cara Herbitter, Barbara A. Gawinski, Jason Fletcher, Marji Gold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite abortion being one of the most common procedures undergone by women of reproductive age in the United States, the number of abortion providers has been declining for the last 20 years. We sought to assess the long-term impact of the Reproductive Health Program (RHP), a national elective abortion training program for primary care abortion providers that operated from 1999-2005. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional study of 220 former RHP trainees. Participants were interviewed over the phone and asked a series of questions about their training at RHP, their current practice, abortion provision since RHP, and enablers and barriers to abortion provision. RESULTS: More than half of respondents (58.8%) have provided any abortions since RHP; more have provided medical abortions (56.5%) than surgical abortions (47.1%). Of respondents who have provided abortions, most have performed more than 50 surgical (87.5%) or medical (77.1%) abortions since RHP and had provided an abortion in the last 3 months (67.5%, 70.8%). More than 90% of abortion providers reported having liability insurance that covers abortion, colleague support, ease of obtaining medications and/or equipment, reimbursement, and administrative and/or staff support at the site where they provide abortions. Relative to providers, the greatest barriers reported by non-providers were lack of skills, concerns about liability, and difficulty obtaining supplies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the RHP model of elective training can yield a substantial percentage of abortion providers. We also describe enablers and barriers to provision once trainees are in practice, highlighting the importance of continued support after training is completed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)493-500
Number of pages8
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume44
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reproductive Health
Liability Insurance
Training Support
Primary Health Care
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Greenberg, M., Herbitter, C., Gawinski, B. A., Fletcher, J., & Gold, M. (2012). Barriers and enablers to becoming abortion providers: The reproductive health program. Family Medicine, 44(7), 493-500.

Barriers and enablers to becoming abortion providers : The reproductive health program. / Greenberg, Megan; Herbitter, Cara; Gawinski, Barbara A.; Fletcher, Jason; Gold, Marji.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 7, 07.2012, p. 493-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Greenberg, M, Herbitter, C, Gawinski, BA, Fletcher, J & Gold, M 2012, 'Barriers and enablers to becoming abortion providers: The reproductive health program', Family Medicine, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 493-500.
Greenberg M, Herbitter C, Gawinski BA, Fletcher J, Gold M. Barriers and enablers to becoming abortion providers: The reproductive health program. Family Medicine. 2012 Jul;44(7):493-500.
Greenberg, Megan ; Herbitter, Cara ; Gawinski, Barbara A. ; Fletcher, Jason ; Gold, Marji. / Barriers and enablers to becoming abortion providers : The reproductive health program. In: Family Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 44, No. 7. pp. 493-500.
@article{464cbbcfab404fc9ab4815400cb6e603,
title = "Barriers and enablers to becoming abortion providers: The reproductive health program",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite abortion being one of the most common procedures undergone by women of reproductive age in the United States, the number of abortion providers has been declining for the last 20 years. We sought to assess the long-term impact of the Reproductive Health Program (RHP), a national elective abortion training program for primary care abortion providers that operated from 1999-2005. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional study of 220 former RHP trainees. Participants were interviewed over the phone and asked a series of questions about their training at RHP, their current practice, abortion provision since RHP, and enablers and barriers to abortion provision. RESULTS: More than half of respondents (58.8{\%}) have provided any abortions since RHP; more have provided medical abortions (56.5{\%}) than surgical abortions (47.1{\%}). Of respondents who have provided abortions, most have performed more than 50 surgical (87.5{\%}) or medical (77.1{\%}) abortions since RHP and had provided an abortion in the last 3 months (67.5{\%}, 70.8{\%}). More than 90{\%} of abortion providers reported having liability insurance that covers abortion, colleague support, ease of obtaining medications and/or equipment, reimbursement, and administrative and/or staff support at the site where they provide abortions. Relative to providers, the greatest barriers reported by non-providers were lack of skills, concerns about liability, and difficulty obtaining supplies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the RHP model of elective training can yield a substantial percentage of abortion providers. We also describe enablers and barriers to provision once trainees are in practice, highlighting the importance of continued support after training is completed.",
author = "Megan Greenberg and Cara Herbitter and Gawinski, {Barbara A.} and Jason Fletcher and Marji Gold",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "493--500",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers and enablers to becoming abortion providers

T2 - The reproductive health program

AU - Greenberg, Megan

AU - Herbitter, Cara

AU - Gawinski, Barbara A.

AU - Fletcher, Jason

AU - Gold, Marji

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite abortion being one of the most common procedures undergone by women of reproductive age in the United States, the number of abortion providers has been declining for the last 20 years. We sought to assess the long-term impact of the Reproductive Health Program (RHP), a national elective abortion training program for primary care abortion providers that operated from 1999-2005. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional study of 220 former RHP trainees. Participants were interviewed over the phone and asked a series of questions about their training at RHP, their current practice, abortion provision since RHP, and enablers and barriers to abortion provision. RESULTS: More than half of respondents (58.8%) have provided any abortions since RHP; more have provided medical abortions (56.5%) than surgical abortions (47.1%). Of respondents who have provided abortions, most have performed more than 50 surgical (87.5%) or medical (77.1%) abortions since RHP and had provided an abortion in the last 3 months (67.5%, 70.8%). More than 90% of abortion providers reported having liability insurance that covers abortion, colleague support, ease of obtaining medications and/or equipment, reimbursement, and administrative and/or staff support at the site where they provide abortions. Relative to providers, the greatest barriers reported by non-providers were lack of skills, concerns about liability, and difficulty obtaining supplies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the RHP model of elective training can yield a substantial percentage of abortion providers. We also describe enablers and barriers to provision once trainees are in practice, highlighting the importance of continued support after training is completed.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite abortion being one of the most common procedures undergone by women of reproductive age in the United States, the number of abortion providers has been declining for the last 20 years. We sought to assess the long-term impact of the Reproductive Health Program (RHP), a national elective abortion training program for primary care abortion providers that operated from 1999-2005. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional study of 220 former RHP trainees. Participants were interviewed over the phone and asked a series of questions about their training at RHP, their current practice, abortion provision since RHP, and enablers and barriers to abortion provision. RESULTS: More than half of respondents (58.8%) have provided any abortions since RHP; more have provided medical abortions (56.5%) than surgical abortions (47.1%). Of respondents who have provided abortions, most have performed more than 50 surgical (87.5%) or medical (77.1%) abortions since RHP and had provided an abortion in the last 3 months (67.5%, 70.8%). More than 90% of abortion providers reported having liability insurance that covers abortion, colleague support, ease of obtaining medications and/or equipment, reimbursement, and administrative and/or staff support at the site where they provide abortions. Relative to providers, the greatest barriers reported by non-providers were lack of skills, concerns about liability, and difficulty obtaining supplies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the RHP model of elective training can yield a substantial percentage of abortion providers. We also describe enablers and barriers to provision once trainees are in practice, highlighting the importance of continued support after training is completed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863971153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863971153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 22791534

AN - SCOPUS:84863971153

VL - 44

SP - 493

EP - 500

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 7

ER -