Augmenting the augmented bladder: Treatment of the contractile bowel segment

John C. Pope IV, Michael A. Keating, Anthony J. Casale, Richard C. Rink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Bowel used for bladder reconstruction regardless of detubularization occasionally retains its contractile properties. Of 323 patients who underwent primary enterocystoplasty we identified 19 who continue to have high pressure bladder contractions and required augmentation of the previously augmented bladder. Materials and Methods: Reason for repeat augmentation, upper tract changes, original and secondary bowel segments used, and urodynamic findings were evaluated in all patients. Current status and followup also were noted. Results: After initial augmentation 8 patients had persistent incontinence, 5 bladder perforation, 3 isolated upper tract changes, 2 incontinence and bladder perforation, and I incontinence plus intractable pain. Preoperative urodynamics revealed detrusor pressures from 30 to 100 cm. water. All patients had adequate bladder outlet resistance. The original bowel segments used were sigmoid in 12 cases, stomach in 4, ileum in 2 and cecum in 1. Bowel segments for reaugmentation were ileum in 16 cases and sigmoid in 3. Of the 11 patients with incontinence 10 are now dry. All cases of upper tract changes resolved. Mean followup since re-augmentation is 52 months. Conclusions: If the outcome of bladder augmentation is less than optimal, it is important to reevaluate the bladder dynamics. In rare instances these patients may continue to have high pressure contractions with a functionally small bladder capacity. In such situations re-augmentation with an additional bowel segment is an excellent alternative to a difficult clinical problem and provides good results in the vast majority of cases. This treatment may not totally αlleviate the contractions but it does decrease them and increase the volumes at which the contractions occur, making them no longer clinically or functionally significant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)854-857
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume160
Issue number3 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urinary Bladder
Therapeutics
Urodynamics
Sigmoid Colon
Ileum
Pressure
Intractable Pain
Cecum
Stomach
Water

Keywords

  • Bladder
  • Intestines
  • Stomach
  • Urinary tract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Augmenting the augmented bladder : Treatment of the contractile bowel segment. / Pope IV, John C.; Keating, Michael A.; Casale, Anthony J.; Rink, Richard C.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 160, No. 3 I, 09.1998, p. 854-857.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pope IV, John C. ; Keating, Michael A. ; Casale, Anthony J. ; Rink, Richard C. / Augmenting the augmented bladder : Treatment of the contractile bowel segment. In: Journal of Urology. 1998 ; Vol. 160, No. 3 I. pp. 854-857.
@article{03b88dc352a440d7a36f3d8d9e974234,
title = "Augmenting the augmented bladder: Treatment of the contractile bowel segment",
abstract = "Purpose: Bowel used for bladder reconstruction regardless of detubularization occasionally retains its contractile properties. Of 323 patients who underwent primary enterocystoplasty we identified 19 who continue to have high pressure bladder contractions and required augmentation of the previously augmented bladder. Materials and Methods: Reason for repeat augmentation, upper tract changes, original and secondary bowel segments used, and urodynamic findings were evaluated in all patients. Current status and followup also were noted. Results: After initial augmentation 8 patients had persistent incontinence, 5 bladder perforation, 3 isolated upper tract changes, 2 incontinence and bladder perforation, and I incontinence plus intractable pain. Preoperative urodynamics revealed detrusor pressures from 30 to 100 cm. water. All patients had adequate bladder outlet resistance. The original bowel segments used were sigmoid in 12 cases, stomach in 4, ileum in 2 and cecum in 1. Bowel segments for reaugmentation were ileum in 16 cases and sigmoid in 3. Of the 11 patients with incontinence 10 are now dry. All cases of upper tract changes resolved. Mean followup since re-augmentation is 52 months. Conclusions: If the outcome of bladder augmentation is less than optimal, it is important to reevaluate the bladder dynamics. In rare instances these patients may continue to have high pressure contractions with a functionally small bladder capacity. In such situations re-augmentation with an additional bowel segment is an excellent alternative to a difficult clinical problem and provides good results in the vast majority of cases. This treatment may not totally αlleviate the contractions but it does decrease them and increase the volumes at which the contractions occur, making them no longer clinically or functionally significant.",
keywords = "Bladder, Intestines, Stomach, Urinary tract",
author = "{Pope IV}, {John C.} and Keating, {Michael A.} and Casale, {Anthony J.} and Rink, {Richard C.}",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62820-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "160",
pages = "854--857",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Augmenting the augmented bladder

T2 - Treatment of the contractile bowel segment

AU - Pope IV, John C.

AU - Keating, Michael A.

AU - Casale, Anthony J.

AU - Rink, Richard C.

PY - 1998/9

Y1 - 1998/9

N2 - Purpose: Bowel used for bladder reconstruction regardless of detubularization occasionally retains its contractile properties. Of 323 patients who underwent primary enterocystoplasty we identified 19 who continue to have high pressure bladder contractions and required augmentation of the previously augmented bladder. Materials and Methods: Reason for repeat augmentation, upper tract changes, original and secondary bowel segments used, and urodynamic findings were evaluated in all patients. Current status and followup also were noted. Results: After initial augmentation 8 patients had persistent incontinence, 5 bladder perforation, 3 isolated upper tract changes, 2 incontinence and bladder perforation, and I incontinence plus intractable pain. Preoperative urodynamics revealed detrusor pressures from 30 to 100 cm. water. All patients had adequate bladder outlet resistance. The original bowel segments used were sigmoid in 12 cases, stomach in 4, ileum in 2 and cecum in 1. Bowel segments for reaugmentation were ileum in 16 cases and sigmoid in 3. Of the 11 patients with incontinence 10 are now dry. All cases of upper tract changes resolved. Mean followup since re-augmentation is 52 months. Conclusions: If the outcome of bladder augmentation is less than optimal, it is important to reevaluate the bladder dynamics. In rare instances these patients may continue to have high pressure contractions with a functionally small bladder capacity. In such situations re-augmentation with an additional bowel segment is an excellent alternative to a difficult clinical problem and provides good results in the vast majority of cases. This treatment may not totally αlleviate the contractions but it does decrease them and increase the volumes at which the contractions occur, making them no longer clinically or functionally significant.

AB - Purpose: Bowel used for bladder reconstruction regardless of detubularization occasionally retains its contractile properties. Of 323 patients who underwent primary enterocystoplasty we identified 19 who continue to have high pressure bladder contractions and required augmentation of the previously augmented bladder. Materials and Methods: Reason for repeat augmentation, upper tract changes, original and secondary bowel segments used, and urodynamic findings were evaluated in all patients. Current status and followup also were noted. Results: After initial augmentation 8 patients had persistent incontinence, 5 bladder perforation, 3 isolated upper tract changes, 2 incontinence and bladder perforation, and I incontinence plus intractable pain. Preoperative urodynamics revealed detrusor pressures from 30 to 100 cm. water. All patients had adequate bladder outlet resistance. The original bowel segments used were sigmoid in 12 cases, stomach in 4, ileum in 2 and cecum in 1. Bowel segments for reaugmentation were ileum in 16 cases and sigmoid in 3. Of the 11 patients with incontinence 10 are now dry. All cases of upper tract changes resolved. Mean followup since re-augmentation is 52 months. Conclusions: If the outcome of bladder augmentation is less than optimal, it is important to reevaluate the bladder dynamics. In rare instances these patients may continue to have high pressure contractions with a functionally small bladder capacity. In such situations re-augmentation with an additional bowel segment is an excellent alternative to a difficult clinical problem and provides good results in the vast majority of cases. This treatment may not totally αlleviate the contractions but it does decrease them and increase the volumes at which the contractions occur, making them no longer clinically or functionally significant.

KW - Bladder

KW - Intestines

KW - Stomach

KW - Urinary tract

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032322390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032322390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62820-9

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62820-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 9720575

AN - SCOPUS:0032322390

VL - 160

SP - 854

EP - 857

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 3 I

ER -