Auditory-visual responsiveness in full-term and preterm infants

Katharine R. Lawson, al et al

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Compared older preterm and full-term infants in their response to objects in a dynamic multimodal context. In Study I, 67 12-wk-old full-term infants and 29 preterm infants (mean age 90 days) served as Ss. After familiarization with a silent moving object, full-term Ss recognized the object when it was stationary. When sound accompanied the moving object during familiarization, full-term Ss showed increased attention to the object but no subsequent recognition of that object. Neither high- nor low-risk preterms, at a comparable conceptional age, recognized the objects under any condition, but the low-risk preterms did show greater attention to the moving objects with sound. In Study II, 43 preterm Ss were tested approximately 6 mo after their estimated term date. The performance of the low-risk preterms was the same as that of full-terms; that is, through differential responding, they demonstrated association of an object and sound. In contrast, the high-risk preterms showed no differential looking. Thus both low- and high-risk preterms showed less differential responding than did normal full-terms at 3 mo, but at 6 mo only the high-risk preterms were different from the full-terms. Results suggest that the high-risk preterms are at a disadvantage for learning about the dynamic and multimodal aspects of their environment. (13 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-127
Number of pages8
JournalDevelopmental Psychology
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1984

Fingerprint

Premature Infants
infant
Learning
learning
performance

Keywords

  • auditory/visual responsiveness, full-term vs high- vs low-risk preterm infants, 60-mo longitudinal study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Life-span and Life-course Studies
  • Demography
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Auditory-visual responsiveness in full-term and preterm infants. / Lawson, Katharine R.; et al, al.

In: Developmental Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.1984, p. 120-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lawson, Katharine R. ; et al, al. / Auditory-visual responsiveness in full-term and preterm infants. In: Developmental Psychology. 1984 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 120-127.
@article{ed70c38b19bf459e8dbf9573514b337a,
title = "Auditory-visual responsiveness in full-term and preterm infants",
abstract = "Compared older preterm and full-term infants in their response to objects in a dynamic multimodal context. In Study I, 67 12-wk-old full-term infants and 29 preterm infants (mean age 90 days) served as Ss. After familiarization with a silent moving object, full-term Ss recognized the object when it was stationary. When sound accompanied the moving object during familiarization, full-term Ss showed increased attention to the object but no subsequent recognition of that object. Neither high- nor low-risk preterms, at a comparable conceptional age, recognized the objects under any condition, but the low-risk preterms did show greater attention to the moving objects with sound. In Study II, 43 preterm Ss were tested approximately 6 mo after their estimated term date. The performance of the low-risk preterms was the same as that of full-terms; that is, through differential responding, they demonstrated association of an object and sound. In contrast, the high-risk preterms showed no differential looking. Thus both low- and high-risk preterms showed less differential responding than did normal full-terms at 3 mo, but at 6 mo only the high-risk preterms were different from the full-terms. Results suggest that the high-risk preterms are at a disadvantage for learning about the dynamic and multimodal aspects of their environment. (13 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "auditory/visual responsiveness, full-term vs high- vs low-risk preterm infants, 60-mo longitudinal study",
author = "Lawson, {Katharine R.} and {et al}, al",
year = "1984",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0012-1649.20.1.120",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "120--127",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Auditory-visual responsiveness in full-term and preterm infants

AU - Lawson, Katharine R.

AU - et al, al

PY - 1984/1

Y1 - 1984/1

N2 - Compared older preterm and full-term infants in their response to objects in a dynamic multimodal context. In Study I, 67 12-wk-old full-term infants and 29 preterm infants (mean age 90 days) served as Ss. After familiarization with a silent moving object, full-term Ss recognized the object when it was stationary. When sound accompanied the moving object during familiarization, full-term Ss showed increased attention to the object but no subsequent recognition of that object. Neither high- nor low-risk preterms, at a comparable conceptional age, recognized the objects under any condition, but the low-risk preterms did show greater attention to the moving objects with sound. In Study II, 43 preterm Ss were tested approximately 6 mo after their estimated term date. The performance of the low-risk preterms was the same as that of full-terms; that is, through differential responding, they demonstrated association of an object and sound. In contrast, the high-risk preterms showed no differential looking. Thus both low- and high-risk preterms showed less differential responding than did normal full-terms at 3 mo, but at 6 mo only the high-risk preterms were different from the full-terms. Results suggest that the high-risk preterms are at a disadvantage for learning about the dynamic and multimodal aspects of their environment. (13 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Compared older preterm and full-term infants in their response to objects in a dynamic multimodal context. In Study I, 67 12-wk-old full-term infants and 29 preterm infants (mean age 90 days) served as Ss. After familiarization with a silent moving object, full-term Ss recognized the object when it was stationary. When sound accompanied the moving object during familiarization, full-term Ss showed increased attention to the object but no subsequent recognition of that object. Neither high- nor low-risk preterms, at a comparable conceptional age, recognized the objects under any condition, but the low-risk preterms did show greater attention to the moving objects with sound. In Study II, 43 preterm Ss were tested approximately 6 mo after their estimated term date. The performance of the low-risk preterms was the same as that of full-terms; that is, through differential responding, they demonstrated association of an object and sound. In contrast, the high-risk preterms showed no differential looking. Thus both low- and high-risk preterms showed less differential responding than did normal full-terms at 3 mo, but at 6 mo only the high-risk preterms were different from the full-terms. Results suggest that the high-risk preterms are at a disadvantage for learning about the dynamic and multimodal aspects of their environment. (13 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - auditory/visual responsiveness, full-term vs high- vs low-risk preterm infants, 60-mo longitudinal study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149370515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149370515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0012-1649.20.1.120

DO - 10.1037/0012-1649.20.1.120

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:58149370515

VL - 20

SP - 120

EP - 127

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 1

ER -