Auditory perception of segmental features

a functional-neuroanatomic study

Dana F. Boatman, Ronald P. Lesser, Charles B. Hall, Barry Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which segmental feature perception depends on left-hemisphere mechanisms, as previously claimed. We used direct cortical electrical interference to examine purported lateralisation differences in the perception of stop consonants and vowels and in stop consonant voicing and place-of-articulation. Electrical interference was applied through indwelling subdural electrode arrays covering the lateral left perisylvian cortex of six patients with normal speech perception and language abilities. Extensive screening of the temporal lobe and other cortical regions revealed auditory syllable discrimination errors at only one posterior temporal site in each patient. Patients were significantly more impaired in detecting consonant differences than vowel differences, but showed no evidence of selective voicing or place-of-articulation impairments when pairs were contrasted in syllable-initial position. Moreover, discrepancies in patients' ability to detect place-of-articulation and voicing differences in syllable-final position were attributed to syllable context effects. These findings concur with previous claims concerning the relative importance of the left hemisphere for consonant perception, and further suggest that stop consonant processing is supported by a small region of the left posterior temporal lobe. Conversely, despite the specificity of electrical interference effects, our data do not support previous claims for the neurofunctional independence of stop consonant feature detectors, and furthermore suggest that no single feature may account for the lateralisation of stop consonant perception.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)225-234
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neurolinguistics
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Auditory Perception
Aptitude
Temporal Lobe
interference
Speech Perception
ability
Electrodes
Language
discrimination
Stop Consonants
language
evidence
Voicing
Interference
Place of Articulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Auditory perception of segmental features : a functional-neuroanatomic study. / Boatman, Dana F.; Lesser, Ronald P.; Hall, Charles B.; Gordon, Barry.

In: Journal of Neurolinguistics, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1994, p. 225-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boatman, Dana F. ; Lesser, Ronald P. ; Hall, Charles B. ; Gordon, Barry. / Auditory perception of segmental features : a functional-neuroanatomic study. In: Journal of Neurolinguistics. 1994 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 225-234.
@article{dafeff44c9c0417e992515d4d0fe3370,
title = "Auditory perception of segmental features: a functional-neuroanatomic study",
abstract = "This study investigated the extent to which segmental feature perception depends on left-hemisphere mechanisms, as previously claimed. We used direct cortical electrical interference to examine purported lateralisation differences in the perception of stop consonants and vowels and in stop consonant voicing and place-of-articulation. Electrical interference was applied through indwelling subdural electrode arrays covering the lateral left perisylvian cortex of six patients with normal speech perception and language abilities. Extensive screening of the temporal lobe and other cortical regions revealed auditory syllable discrimination errors at only one posterior temporal site in each patient. Patients were significantly more impaired in detecting consonant differences than vowel differences, but showed no evidence of selective voicing or place-of-articulation impairments when pairs were contrasted in syllable-initial position. Moreover, discrepancies in patients' ability to detect place-of-articulation and voicing differences in syllable-final position were attributed to syllable context effects. These findings concur with previous claims concerning the relative importance of the left hemisphere for consonant perception, and further suggest that stop consonant processing is supported by a small region of the left posterior temporal lobe. Conversely, despite the specificity of electrical interference effects, our data do not support previous claims for the neurofunctional independence of stop consonant feature detectors, and furthermore suggest that no single feature may account for the lateralisation of stop consonant perception.",
author = "Boatman, {Dana F.} and Lesser, {Ronald P.} and Hall, {Charles B.} and Barry Gordon",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/0911-6044(94)90028-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "225--234",
journal = "Journal of Neurolinguistics",
issn = "0911-6044",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Auditory perception of segmental features

T2 - a functional-neuroanatomic study

AU - Boatman, Dana F.

AU - Lesser, Ronald P.

AU - Hall, Charles B.

AU - Gordon, Barry

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - This study investigated the extent to which segmental feature perception depends on left-hemisphere mechanisms, as previously claimed. We used direct cortical electrical interference to examine purported lateralisation differences in the perception of stop consonants and vowels and in stop consonant voicing and place-of-articulation. Electrical interference was applied through indwelling subdural electrode arrays covering the lateral left perisylvian cortex of six patients with normal speech perception and language abilities. Extensive screening of the temporal lobe and other cortical regions revealed auditory syllable discrimination errors at only one posterior temporal site in each patient. Patients were significantly more impaired in detecting consonant differences than vowel differences, but showed no evidence of selective voicing or place-of-articulation impairments when pairs were contrasted in syllable-initial position. Moreover, discrepancies in patients' ability to detect place-of-articulation and voicing differences in syllable-final position were attributed to syllable context effects. These findings concur with previous claims concerning the relative importance of the left hemisphere for consonant perception, and further suggest that stop consonant processing is supported by a small region of the left posterior temporal lobe. Conversely, despite the specificity of electrical interference effects, our data do not support previous claims for the neurofunctional independence of stop consonant feature detectors, and furthermore suggest that no single feature may account for the lateralisation of stop consonant perception.

AB - This study investigated the extent to which segmental feature perception depends on left-hemisphere mechanisms, as previously claimed. We used direct cortical electrical interference to examine purported lateralisation differences in the perception of stop consonants and vowels and in stop consonant voicing and place-of-articulation. Electrical interference was applied through indwelling subdural electrode arrays covering the lateral left perisylvian cortex of six patients with normal speech perception and language abilities. Extensive screening of the temporal lobe and other cortical regions revealed auditory syllable discrimination errors at only one posterior temporal site in each patient. Patients were significantly more impaired in detecting consonant differences than vowel differences, but showed no evidence of selective voicing or place-of-articulation impairments when pairs were contrasted in syllable-initial position. Moreover, discrepancies in patients' ability to detect place-of-articulation and voicing differences in syllable-final position were attributed to syllable context effects. These findings concur with previous claims concerning the relative importance of the left hemisphere for consonant perception, and further suggest that stop consonant processing is supported by a small region of the left posterior temporal lobe. Conversely, despite the specificity of electrical interference effects, our data do not support previous claims for the neurofunctional independence of stop consonant feature detectors, and furthermore suggest that no single feature may account for the lateralisation of stop consonant perception.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000515948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000515948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0911-6044(94)90028-0

DO - 10.1016/0911-6044(94)90028-0

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 225

EP - 234

JO - Journal of Neurolinguistics

JF - Journal of Neurolinguistics

SN - 0911-6044

IS - 3

ER -