TY - JOUR
T1 - Association between US norepinephrine shortage and mortality among patients with septic shock
AU - Vail, Emily
AU - Gershengorn, Hayley B.
AU - Hua, May
AU - Walkey, Allan J.
AU - Rubenfeld, Gordon
AU - Wunsch, Hannah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/4/11
Y1 - 2017/4/11
N2 - IMPORTANCE Drug shortages in the United States are common, but their effect on patient care and outcomes has rarely been reported. OBJECTIVE To assess changes to patient care and outcomes associated with a 2011 national shortage of norepinephrine, the first-line vasopressor for septic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort study of 26 US hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database with a baseline rate of norepinephrine use of at least 60% for patients with septic shock. The cohort included adults with septic shock admitted to study hospitals between July 1, 2008, and June 30, 2013 (n = 27 835). EXPOSURES Hospital-level norepinephrine shortage was defined as any quarterly (3-month) interval in 2011 during which the hospital rate of norepinephrine use decreased by more than 20%from baseline. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Use of alternative vasopressorswas assessed and a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between admission to a hospital during a norepinephrine shortage quarter and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS Among 27 835 patients (median age, 69 years [interquartile range, 57-79 years]; 47.0%women) with septic shock in 26 hospitals that demonstrated at least 1 quarter of norepinephrine shortage in 2011, norepinephrine use among cohort patients declined from 77.0%(95%CI, 76.2%-77.8%) of patients before the shortage to a low of 55.7%(95%CI, 52.0%-58.4%) in the second quarter of 2011; phenylephrine was the most frequently used alternative vasopressor during this time (baseline, 36.2%[95%CI, 35.3%-37.1%]; maximum, 54.4%[95%CI, 51.8%-57.2%]). Compared with hospital admission with septic shock during quarters of normal use, hospital admission during quarters of shortage was associated with an increased rate of in-hospital mortality (9283 of 25 874 patients [35.9%] vs 777 of 1961 patients [39.6%], respectively; absolute risk increase = 3.7%[95%CI, 1.5%-6.0%]; adjusted odds ratio = 1.15 [95%CI, 1.01-1.30]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with septic shock in US hospitals affected by the 2011 norepinephrine shortage, the most commonly administered alternative vasopressor was phenylephrine. Patients admitted to these hospitals during times of shortage had higher in-hospital mortality.
AB - IMPORTANCE Drug shortages in the United States are common, but their effect on patient care and outcomes has rarely been reported. OBJECTIVE To assess changes to patient care and outcomes associated with a 2011 national shortage of norepinephrine, the first-line vasopressor for septic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort study of 26 US hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database with a baseline rate of norepinephrine use of at least 60% for patients with septic shock. The cohort included adults with septic shock admitted to study hospitals between July 1, 2008, and June 30, 2013 (n = 27 835). EXPOSURES Hospital-level norepinephrine shortage was defined as any quarterly (3-month) interval in 2011 during which the hospital rate of norepinephrine use decreased by more than 20%from baseline. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Use of alternative vasopressorswas assessed and a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between admission to a hospital during a norepinephrine shortage quarter and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS Among 27 835 patients (median age, 69 years [interquartile range, 57-79 years]; 47.0%women) with septic shock in 26 hospitals that demonstrated at least 1 quarter of norepinephrine shortage in 2011, norepinephrine use among cohort patients declined from 77.0%(95%CI, 76.2%-77.8%) of patients before the shortage to a low of 55.7%(95%CI, 52.0%-58.4%) in the second quarter of 2011; phenylephrine was the most frequently used alternative vasopressor during this time (baseline, 36.2%[95%CI, 35.3%-37.1%]; maximum, 54.4%[95%CI, 51.8%-57.2%]). Compared with hospital admission with septic shock during quarters of normal use, hospital admission during quarters of shortage was associated with an increased rate of in-hospital mortality (9283 of 25 874 patients [35.9%] vs 777 of 1961 patients [39.6%], respectively; absolute risk increase = 3.7%[95%CI, 1.5%-6.0%]; adjusted odds ratio = 1.15 [95%CI, 1.01-1.30]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with septic shock in US hospitals affected by the 2011 norepinephrine shortage, the most commonly administered alternative vasopressor was phenylephrine. Patients admitted to these hospitals during times of shortage had higher in-hospital mortality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017507665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017507665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.2017.2841
DO - 10.1001/jama.2017.2841
M3 - Article
C2 - 28322415
AN - SCOPUS:85017507665
SN - 0002-9955
VL - 317
SP - 1433
EP - 1442
JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
IS - 14
ER -