Assessment of an introductory cervicocerebral catheter angiography learning program: A pilot study

Y. W. Lui, J. M. Farinhas, A. M. Basalely, K. A. Hsu, K. Freeman, J. A. Bello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no standardized curriculum currently available at most institutions for establishing procedural competency in trainees performing cervicocerebral angiography. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a simple learning program to supplement the teaching of basic cervicocerebral angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 11-session interactive curriculum was implemented covering anatomic, clinical, and radiographic topics for the novice cervicocerebral angiographer. The target learner was the neuroradiology fellow. Data were gathered regarding fellow comfort level on topics relating to cervicocerebral angiography by using a 5-point Likert scale. Improvement in scores on knowledge-based questions after completion of the curriculum was calculated (McNemar test). Trainee-perceived utility of the program was also recorded by using a 5-point Likert scale. Focus sessions were held at the completion of the curriculum to gather feedback regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the program from participants. RESULTS: Ten subjects were enrolled in this pilot study for 3 years. Topics where participants reported a poor initial comfort level (4 or higher) included selection of injection rates and volumes and reformation of reverse-curve catheters. Trainees demonstrated a statistically significant change in the distribution of scores of 29.3% (49.4%-78.7% correct response rate, P < .0001). The average perceived utility was 1.5 (1 = most useful, 5 = least useful). CONCLUSIONS: This simple learning program was a useful adjunct to the training of fellows in diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, resulting in quantitative improvements in knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1041-1045
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Angiography
Catheters
Learning
Teaching
Injections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Assessment of an introductory cervicocerebral catheter angiography learning program : A pilot study. / Lui, Y. W.; Farinhas, J. M.; Basalely, A. M.; Hsu, K. A.; Freeman, K.; Bello, J. A.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 1041-1045.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lui, Y. W. ; Farinhas, J. M. ; Basalely, A. M. ; Hsu, K. A. ; Freeman, K. ; Bello, J. A. / Assessment of an introductory cervicocerebral catheter angiography learning program : A pilot study. In: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2012 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 1041-1045.
@article{f05e6e1ab9e94c53942009bb93cb4975,
title = "Assessment of an introductory cervicocerebral catheter angiography learning program: A pilot study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no standardized curriculum currently available at most institutions for establishing procedural competency in trainees performing cervicocerebral angiography. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a simple learning program to supplement the teaching of basic cervicocerebral angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 11-session interactive curriculum was implemented covering anatomic, clinical, and radiographic topics for the novice cervicocerebral angiographer. The target learner was the neuroradiology fellow. Data were gathered regarding fellow comfort level on topics relating to cervicocerebral angiography by using a 5-point Likert scale. Improvement in scores on knowledge-based questions after completion of the curriculum was calculated (McNemar test). Trainee-perceived utility of the program was also recorded by using a 5-point Likert scale. Focus sessions were held at the completion of the curriculum to gather feedback regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the program from participants. RESULTS: Ten subjects were enrolled in this pilot study for 3 years. Topics where participants reported a poor initial comfort level (4 or higher) included selection of injection rates and volumes and reformation of reverse-curve catheters. Trainees demonstrated a statistically significant change in the distribution of scores of 29.3{\%} (49.4{\%}-78.7{\%} correct response rate, P < .0001). The average perceived utility was 1.5 (1 = most useful, 5 = least useful). CONCLUSIONS: This simple learning program was a useful adjunct to the training of fellows in diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, resulting in quantitative improvements in knowledge.",
author = "Lui, {Y. W.} and Farinhas, {J. M.} and Basalely, {A. M.} and Hsu, {K. A.} and K. Freeman and Bello, {J. A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.3174/ajnr.A2931",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1041--1045",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of an introductory cervicocerebral catheter angiography learning program

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Lui, Y. W.

AU - Farinhas, J. M.

AU - Basalely, A. M.

AU - Hsu, K. A.

AU - Freeman, K.

AU - Bello, J. A.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no standardized curriculum currently available at most institutions for establishing procedural competency in trainees performing cervicocerebral angiography. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a simple learning program to supplement the teaching of basic cervicocerebral angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 11-session interactive curriculum was implemented covering anatomic, clinical, and radiographic topics for the novice cervicocerebral angiographer. The target learner was the neuroradiology fellow. Data were gathered regarding fellow comfort level on topics relating to cervicocerebral angiography by using a 5-point Likert scale. Improvement in scores on knowledge-based questions after completion of the curriculum was calculated (McNemar test). Trainee-perceived utility of the program was also recorded by using a 5-point Likert scale. Focus sessions were held at the completion of the curriculum to gather feedback regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the program from participants. RESULTS: Ten subjects were enrolled in this pilot study for 3 years. Topics where participants reported a poor initial comfort level (4 or higher) included selection of injection rates and volumes and reformation of reverse-curve catheters. Trainees demonstrated a statistically significant change in the distribution of scores of 29.3% (49.4%-78.7% correct response rate, P < .0001). The average perceived utility was 1.5 (1 = most useful, 5 = least useful). CONCLUSIONS: This simple learning program was a useful adjunct to the training of fellows in diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, resulting in quantitative improvements in knowledge.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no standardized curriculum currently available at most institutions for establishing procedural competency in trainees performing cervicocerebral angiography. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a simple learning program to supplement the teaching of basic cervicocerebral angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 11-session interactive curriculum was implemented covering anatomic, clinical, and radiographic topics for the novice cervicocerebral angiographer. The target learner was the neuroradiology fellow. Data were gathered regarding fellow comfort level on topics relating to cervicocerebral angiography by using a 5-point Likert scale. Improvement in scores on knowledge-based questions after completion of the curriculum was calculated (McNemar test). Trainee-perceived utility of the program was also recorded by using a 5-point Likert scale. Focus sessions were held at the completion of the curriculum to gather feedback regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the program from participants. RESULTS: Ten subjects were enrolled in this pilot study for 3 years. Topics where participants reported a poor initial comfort level (4 or higher) included selection of injection rates and volumes and reformation of reverse-curve catheters. Trainees demonstrated a statistically significant change in the distribution of scores of 29.3% (49.4%-78.7% correct response rate, P < .0001). The average perceived utility was 1.5 (1 = most useful, 5 = least useful). CONCLUSIONS: This simple learning program was a useful adjunct to the training of fellows in diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, resulting in quantitative improvements in knowledge.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862550758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862550758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A2931

DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A2931

M3 - Article

C2 - 22282448

AN - SCOPUS:84862550758

VL - 33

SP - 1041

EP - 1045

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 6

ER -