Assessing the validity of tuberculin skin test readings by trained professionals and patients

Philip O. Ozuah, William B. Burton, Keith A. Lerro, Jordan Rosenstock, Michael Mulvihill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objectives: To assess the validity of purified protein derivative (PPD) readings by patients and trained health-care professionals as compared with a calibrated model. Design and participants: Survey of a group of patients, nurses, medical assistants, and physicians at five neighborhood health centers in the Bronx, NY. Interventions: Participants were asked to read a calibrated model with four PPD indurations measuring 0 mm, 3 mm, 7 mm, and 13 mm. Indurations ≥ 5 mm were to be considered 'positive' reactions. Measurements and results: Data were obtained from 233 patients and 80 trained professionals. All patients correctly measured the 0-mm induration site and were able to detect the presence of an induration in 99.3% of possible observations. Compared with professionals, patients had more variability in measurements and interpretations of the 3-, 7-, and 13-mm sites. Professionals detected 100% of all indurations. Patients' specificity for the 0- and 3-mm sites was 97.4% and 62.7%, respectively; whereas sensitivity for the 7- and 13-mm sites was 68.2% and 89.3%, respectively. Professionals' specificity for the 0- and 3-mm sites was 98.7% and 65.3%, respectively; their sensitivity for the 7- and 13-mm sites was 86.7% and 97.3%, respectively. Seventy percent of professionals agreed that the model was a realistic representation of PPD indurations. Conclusions: Patients can reliably distinguish between the presence and absence of an induration at a PPD injection site. They are not as reliable in the measurement and interpretation of test reactions. Professionals had considerable variability in their assessments of PPDs but were more precise overall in their assessments than patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-106
Number of pages3
JournalChest
Volume116
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Tuberculin Test
Skin Tests
Reading
Proteins
Community Health Centers
Physician Assistants
Tuberculin
Nurses
Delivery of Health Care
Injections

Keywords

  • Mantoux purified protein derivative
  • Self-assessment
  • Tuberculin skin test
  • Tuberculosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Assessing the validity of tuberculin skin test readings by trained professionals and patients. / Ozuah, Philip O.; Burton, William B.; Lerro, Keith A.; Rosenstock, Jordan; Mulvihill, Michael.

In: Chest, Vol. 116, No. 1, 1999, p. 104-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ozuah, Philip O. ; Burton, William B. ; Lerro, Keith A. ; Rosenstock, Jordan ; Mulvihill, Michael. / Assessing the validity of tuberculin skin test readings by trained professionals and patients. In: Chest. 1999 ; Vol. 116, No. 1. pp. 104-106.
@article{b3be7029ef694bb7981c78c4cdf5ee64,
title = "Assessing the validity of tuberculin skin test readings by trained professionals and patients",
abstract = "Study objectives: To assess the validity of purified protein derivative (PPD) readings by patients and trained health-care professionals as compared with a calibrated model. Design and participants: Survey of a group of patients, nurses, medical assistants, and physicians at five neighborhood health centers in the Bronx, NY. Interventions: Participants were asked to read a calibrated model with four PPD indurations measuring 0 mm, 3 mm, 7 mm, and 13 mm. Indurations ≥ 5 mm were to be considered 'positive' reactions. Measurements and results: Data were obtained from 233 patients and 80 trained professionals. All patients correctly measured the 0-mm induration site and were able to detect the presence of an induration in 99.3{\%} of possible observations. Compared with professionals, patients had more variability in measurements and interpretations of the 3-, 7-, and 13-mm sites. Professionals detected 100{\%} of all indurations. Patients' specificity for the 0- and 3-mm sites was 97.4{\%} and 62.7{\%}, respectively; whereas sensitivity for the 7- and 13-mm sites was 68.2{\%} and 89.3{\%}, respectively. Professionals' specificity for the 0- and 3-mm sites was 98.7{\%} and 65.3{\%}, respectively; their sensitivity for the 7- and 13-mm sites was 86.7{\%} and 97.3{\%}, respectively. Seventy percent of professionals agreed that the model was a realistic representation of PPD indurations. Conclusions: Patients can reliably distinguish between the presence and absence of an induration at a PPD injection site. They are not as reliable in the measurement and interpretation of test reactions. Professionals had considerable variability in their assessments of PPDs but were more precise overall in their assessments than patients.",
keywords = "Mantoux purified protein derivative, Self-assessment, Tuberculin skin test, Tuberculosis",
author = "Ozuah, {Philip O.} and Burton, {William B.} and Lerro, {Keith A.} and Jordan Rosenstock and Michael Mulvihill",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1378/chest.116.1.104",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "104--106",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the validity of tuberculin skin test readings by trained professionals and patients

AU - Ozuah, Philip O.

AU - Burton, William B.

AU - Lerro, Keith A.

AU - Rosenstock, Jordan

AU - Mulvihill, Michael

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Study objectives: To assess the validity of purified protein derivative (PPD) readings by patients and trained health-care professionals as compared with a calibrated model. Design and participants: Survey of a group of patients, nurses, medical assistants, and physicians at five neighborhood health centers in the Bronx, NY. Interventions: Participants were asked to read a calibrated model with four PPD indurations measuring 0 mm, 3 mm, 7 mm, and 13 mm. Indurations ≥ 5 mm were to be considered 'positive' reactions. Measurements and results: Data were obtained from 233 patients and 80 trained professionals. All patients correctly measured the 0-mm induration site and were able to detect the presence of an induration in 99.3% of possible observations. Compared with professionals, patients had more variability in measurements and interpretations of the 3-, 7-, and 13-mm sites. Professionals detected 100% of all indurations. Patients' specificity for the 0- and 3-mm sites was 97.4% and 62.7%, respectively; whereas sensitivity for the 7- and 13-mm sites was 68.2% and 89.3%, respectively. Professionals' specificity for the 0- and 3-mm sites was 98.7% and 65.3%, respectively; their sensitivity for the 7- and 13-mm sites was 86.7% and 97.3%, respectively. Seventy percent of professionals agreed that the model was a realistic representation of PPD indurations. Conclusions: Patients can reliably distinguish between the presence and absence of an induration at a PPD injection site. They are not as reliable in the measurement and interpretation of test reactions. Professionals had considerable variability in their assessments of PPDs but were more precise overall in their assessments than patients.

AB - Study objectives: To assess the validity of purified protein derivative (PPD) readings by patients and trained health-care professionals as compared with a calibrated model. Design and participants: Survey of a group of patients, nurses, medical assistants, and physicians at five neighborhood health centers in the Bronx, NY. Interventions: Participants were asked to read a calibrated model with four PPD indurations measuring 0 mm, 3 mm, 7 mm, and 13 mm. Indurations ≥ 5 mm were to be considered 'positive' reactions. Measurements and results: Data were obtained from 233 patients and 80 trained professionals. All patients correctly measured the 0-mm induration site and were able to detect the presence of an induration in 99.3% of possible observations. Compared with professionals, patients had more variability in measurements and interpretations of the 3-, 7-, and 13-mm sites. Professionals detected 100% of all indurations. Patients' specificity for the 0- and 3-mm sites was 97.4% and 62.7%, respectively; whereas sensitivity for the 7- and 13-mm sites was 68.2% and 89.3%, respectively. Professionals' specificity for the 0- and 3-mm sites was 98.7% and 65.3%, respectively; their sensitivity for the 7- and 13-mm sites was 86.7% and 97.3%, respectively. Seventy percent of professionals agreed that the model was a realistic representation of PPD indurations. Conclusions: Patients can reliably distinguish between the presence and absence of an induration at a PPD injection site. They are not as reliable in the measurement and interpretation of test reactions. Professionals had considerable variability in their assessments of PPDs but were more precise overall in their assessments than patients.

KW - Mantoux purified protein derivative

KW - Self-assessment

KW - Tuberculin skin test

KW - Tuberculosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032802886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032802886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.116.1.104

DO - 10.1378/chest.116.1.104

M3 - Article

C2 - 10424511

AN - SCOPUS:0032802886

VL - 116

SP - 104

EP - 106

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 1

ER -