Assessing the minimum number of lymph nodes needed at radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer

Umberto Capitanio, Nazareno Suardi, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Yair Lotan, Ganesh S. Palapattu, Patrick J. Bastian, Amit Gupta, Amnon Vazina, Mark Schoenberg, Seth P. Lerner, Arthur I. Sagalowsky, Pierre I. Karakiewicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To identify the likelihood of finding one or more positive lymph nodes (LNs) according to the number of LNs removed at radical cystectomy (RC), as the number of LNs removed affects disease progression and survival after RC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1984 and 2003, 731 assessable patients had RC and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at three different institutions. ROC curve coordinates were used to determine the probability of identifying one or more positive LNs according to the total number of removed LNs. RESULTS Of the 731 patients, 174 (23.8%) had LNs metastases. The mean (median, range) number of LNs removed was 18.7 (17, 1-80). The ROC coordinate-based plots of the number of removed LNs and the probability of finding one or more LNs metastases indicated that removing 45 LNs yielded a 90% probability. Conversely, removing either 15 or 25 LNs indicated, respectively, 50% and 75% probability of detecting one or more LNs metastases. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that removing 25 LNs might represent the lowest threshold for the extent of lymphadenectomy at RC. Our findings confirm the importance of an extended lymph node dissection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1359-1362
Number of pages4
JournalBJU International
Volume103
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer
  • Cystectomy
  • Lymph nodes invasion
  • Lymphadenectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the minimum number of lymph nodes needed at radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this