Are a speculum examination and wet mount always necessary for patients with vaginal symptoms? A pilot randomized controlled trial

Matthew R. Anderson, Andreas Cohrssen, Kathleen Klink, Danit Brahver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The suggested evaluation of vaginal symptoms is based on the wet mount diagnosis of candidiasis, trichomoniasis, and bacterial vaginosis. We wondered if patients with vaginal symptoms could be managed initially based solely on symptoms. Methods: This pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2 urban family practice clinics and enrolled 46 premenopausal, nonpregnant women with acute vaginal symptoms. In the control arm, women were managed based on a speculum examination and wet mount. In the intervention arm, women were managed based on symptoms. Women were tested for gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomoniasis and called 2 weeks later to assess symptom resolution, adverse medication effects, need for revisit, and satisfaction with care. Results: Forty-one of 44 women (93%) felt better 2 weeks after the visit; 28 (64%) had complete resolution of symptoms. The intervention arm had slightly better resolution of symptoms (P = .046); there were other no differences between the 2 arms. Three women were diagnosed with sexually transmitted diseases (trichomoniasis, chlamydia, and gonorrhea). Conclusions: Our pilot study suggests that in selected women it may be reasonable to initially manage vaginal complaints based on symptoms. These results should be confirmed in other larger trials. Testing for sexually transmitted diseases is important in our population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)617-624
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Surgical Instruments
Randomized Controlled Trials
Chlamydia
Gonorrhea
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Bacterial Vaginosis
Symptom Assessment
Family Practice
Candidiasis
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Are a speculum examination and wet mount always necessary for patients with vaginal symptoms? A pilot randomized controlled trial. / Anderson, Matthew R.; Cohrssen, Andreas; Klink, Kathleen; Brahver, Danit.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2009, p. 617-624.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{598a44365dc348fb89e12e0e4d2c856c,
title = "Are a speculum examination and wet mount always necessary for patients with vaginal symptoms? A pilot randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Purpose: The suggested evaluation of vaginal symptoms is based on the wet mount diagnosis of candidiasis, trichomoniasis, and bacterial vaginosis. We wondered if patients with vaginal symptoms could be managed initially based solely on symptoms. Methods: This pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2 urban family practice clinics and enrolled 46 premenopausal, nonpregnant women with acute vaginal symptoms. In the control arm, women were managed based on a speculum examination and wet mount. In the intervention arm, women were managed based on symptoms. Women were tested for gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomoniasis and called 2 weeks later to assess symptom resolution, adverse medication effects, need for revisit, and satisfaction with care. Results: Forty-one of 44 women (93{\%}) felt better 2 weeks after the visit; 28 (64{\%}) had complete resolution of symptoms. The intervention arm had slightly better resolution of symptoms (P = .046); there were other no differences between the 2 arms. Three women were diagnosed with sexually transmitted diseases (trichomoniasis, chlamydia, and gonorrhea). Conclusions: Our pilot study suggests that in selected women it may be reasonable to initially manage vaginal complaints based on symptoms. These results should be confirmed in other larger trials. Testing for sexually transmitted diseases is important in our population.",
author = "Anderson, {Matthew R.} and Andreas Cohrssen and Kathleen Klink and Danit Brahver",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "617--624",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are a speculum examination and wet mount always necessary for patients with vaginal symptoms? A pilot randomized controlled trial

AU - Anderson, Matthew R.

AU - Cohrssen, Andreas

AU - Klink, Kathleen

AU - Brahver, Danit

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose: The suggested evaluation of vaginal symptoms is based on the wet mount diagnosis of candidiasis, trichomoniasis, and bacterial vaginosis. We wondered if patients with vaginal symptoms could be managed initially based solely on symptoms. Methods: This pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2 urban family practice clinics and enrolled 46 premenopausal, nonpregnant women with acute vaginal symptoms. In the control arm, women were managed based on a speculum examination and wet mount. In the intervention arm, women were managed based on symptoms. Women were tested for gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomoniasis and called 2 weeks later to assess symptom resolution, adverse medication effects, need for revisit, and satisfaction with care. Results: Forty-one of 44 women (93%) felt better 2 weeks after the visit; 28 (64%) had complete resolution of symptoms. The intervention arm had slightly better resolution of symptoms (P = .046); there were other no differences between the 2 arms. Three women were diagnosed with sexually transmitted diseases (trichomoniasis, chlamydia, and gonorrhea). Conclusions: Our pilot study suggests that in selected women it may be reasonable to initially manage vaginal complaints based on symptoms. These results should be confirmed in other larger trials. Testing for sexually transmitted diseases is important in our population.

AB - Purpose: The suggested evaluation of vaginal symptoms is based on the wet mount diagnosis of candidiasis, trichomoniasis, and bacterial vaginosis. We wondered if patients with vaginal symptoms could be managed initially based solely on symptoms. Methods: This pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2 urban family practice clinics and enrolled 46 premenopausal, nonpregnant women with acute vaginal symptoms. In the control arm, women were managed based on a speculum examination and wet mount. In the intervention arm, women were managed based on symptoms. Women were tested for gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomoniasis and called 2 weeks later to assess symptom resolution, adverse medication effects, need for revisit, and satisfaction with care. Results: Forty-one of 44 women (93%) felt better 2 weeks after the visit; 28 (64%) had complete resolution of symptoms. The intervention arm had slightly better resolution of symptoms (P = .046); there were other no differences between the 2 arms. Three women were diagnosed with sexually transmitted diseases (trichomoniasis, chlamydia, and gonorrhea). Conclusions: Our pilot study suggests that in selected women it may be reasonable to initially manage vaginal complaints based on symptoms. These results should be confirmed in other larger trials. Testing for sexually transmitted diseases is important in our population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70849129483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70849129483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090006

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090006

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 617

EP - 624

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 6

ER -