TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of System Dynamics to Inform a Model of Adolescent SBIRT Implementation in Primary Care Settings
AU - Lounsbury, David William
AU - Mitchell, Shannon Gwin
AU - Dusek, Kristi Ann
AU - Li, Josh Zhi
AU - Kirk, Arethusa S.
AU - Oros, Marla
AU - Hosler, Colleen
AU - Schwartz, Robert P.
AU - Gryczynski, Jan
AU - Monico, Laura B.
AU - Brown, Barry S.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Ms. Faye Royale-Larkins and the staff of Total Health Care for their collaboration on this project. We also thank Ms. Tinika Christopher for her help with manuscript preparations and Drs. Tisha Wiley and Lori Ducharme for their continued guidance in this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, National Council for Behavioral Health.
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - System dynamics (SD) modeling is used to compare and contrast strategies for effective implementation of an evidence-based adolescent behavioral health treatment in primary care settings. With qualitative and quantitative data from an on-going cluster-randomized trial in 7 federally qualified health center sites, two implementation conditions were compared: generalist vs. specialist. In the generalist approach, the primary care provider (PCP) delivered brief intervention (BI) for substance misuse (n = 4 clinics). In the specialist approach, BIs were delivered by behavioral health counselors (BHCs) (n = 3 clinics). The resultant SD model compared ‘basecase’ dynamics to strategic approaches to deploying continuous technical assistance (TA) and performance feedback reporting (PFR). The basecase effectively represented the SBIRT intervention, which reflected actual monthly volume of adolescent primary care visits (N = 9639), screenings (N = 5937), positive screenings (N = 246), and brief interventions (BIs; N = 50) over the 20-month implementation period. Insights gained suggest that implementation outcomes are sensitive to frequency of PFR, with bimonthly events generating the most rapid and sustained screening results. Simulated trends indicated that availability of the BHC directly impacts success of the specialist model. Similarly, understanding PCPs’ perception of severity of need for intervention is key to outcomes in either condition.
AB - System dynamics (SD) modeling is used to compare and contrast strategies for effective implementation of an evidence-based adolescent behavioral health treatment in primary care settings. With qualitative and quantitative data from an on-going cluster-randomized trial in 7 federally qualified health center sites, two implementation conditions were compared: generalist vs. specialist. In the generalist approach, the primary care provider (PCP) delivered brief intervention (BI) for substance misuse (n = 4 clinics). In the specialist approach, BIs were delivered by behavioral health counselors (BHCs) (n = 3 clinics). The resultant SD model compared ‘basecase’ dynamics to strategic approaches to deploying continuous technical assistance (TA) and performance feedback reporting (PFR). The basecase effectively represented the SBIRT intervention, which reflected actual monthly volume of adolescent primary care visits (N = 9639), screenings (N = 5937), positive screenings (N = 246), and brief interventions (BIs; N = 50) over the 20-month implementation period. Insights gained suggest that implementation outcomes are sensitive to frequency of PFR, with bimonthly events generating the most rapid and sustained screening results. Simulated trends indicated that availability of the BHC directly impacts success of the specialist model. Similarly, understanding PCPs’ perception of severity of need for intervention is key to outcomes in either condition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067922655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067922655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11414-019-09650-y
DO - 10.1007/s11414-019-09650-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 31214935
AN - SCOPUS:85067922655
SN - 1094-3412
VL - 47
SP - 230
EP - 244
JO - Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research
JF - Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research
IS - 2
ER -