Application of System Dynamics to Inform a Model of Adolescent SBIRT Implementation in Primary Care Settings

David W. Lounsbury, Shannon Gwin Mitchell, Kristi Ann Dusek, Josh Zhi Li, Arethusa S. Kirk, Marla Oros, Colleen Hosler, Robert P. Schwartz, Jan Gryczynski, Laura B. Monico, Barry S. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

System dynamics (SD) modeling is used to compare and contrast strategies for effective implementation of an evidence-based adolescent behavioral health treatment in primary care settings. With qualitative and quantitative data from an on-going cluster-randomized trial in 7 federally qualified health center sites, two implementation conditions were compared: generalist vs. specialist. In the generalist approach, the primary care provider (PCP) delivered brief intervention (BI) for substance misuse (n = 4 clinics). In the specialist approach, BIs were delivered by behavioral health counselors (BHCs) (n = 3 clinics). The resultant SD model compared ‘basecase’ dynamics to strategic approaches to deploying continuous technical assistance (TA) and performance feedback reporting (PFR). The basecase effectively represented the SBIRT intervention, which reflected actual monthly volume of adolescent primary care visits (N = 9639), screenings (N = 5937), positive screenings (N = 246), and brief interventions (BIs; N = 50) over the 20-month implementation period. Insights gained suggest that implementation outcomes are sensitive to frequency of PFR, with bimonthly events generating the most rapid and sustained screening results. Simulated trends indicated that availability of the BHC directly impacts success of the specialist model. Similarly, understanding PCPs’ perception of severity of need for intervention is key to outcomes in either condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Behavioral Health Services and Research
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
adolescent
Health
health
counselor
technical assistance
performance
event
trend
evidence
Counselors
Therapeutics
Adolescent Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Application of System Dynamics to Inform a Model of Adolescent SBIRT Implementation in Primary Care Settings. / Lounsbury, David W.; Mitchell, Shannon Gwin; Dusek, Kristi Ann; Li, Josh Zhi; Kirk, Arethusa S.; Oros, Marla; Hosler, Colleen; Schwartz, Robert P.; Gryczynski, Jan; Monico, Laura B.; Brown, Barry S.

In: Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lounsbury, David W. ; Mitchell, Shannon Gwin ; Dusek, Kristi Ann ; Li, Josh Zhi ; Kirk, Arethusa S. ; Oros, Marla ; Hosler, Colleen ; Schwartz, Robert P. ; Gryczynski, Jan ; Monico, Laura B. ; Brown, Barry S. / Application of System Dynamics to Inform a Model of Adolescent SBIRT Implementation in Primary Care Settings. In: Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. 2019.
@article{0f12c01a26354370a35a40a81ffea31b,
title = "Application of System Dynamics to Inform a Model of Adolescent SBIRT Implementation in Primary Care Settings",
abstract = "System dynamics (SD) modeling is used to compare and contrast strategies for effective implementation of an evidence-based adolescent behavioral health treatment in primary care settings. With qualitative and quantitative data from an on-going cluster-randomized trial in 7 federally qualified health center sites, two implementation conditions were compared: generalist vs. specialist. In the generalist approach, the primary care provider (PCP) delivered brief intervention (BI) for substance misuse (n = 4 clinics). In the specialist approach, BIs were delivered by behavioral health counselors (BHCs) (n = 3 clinics). The resultant SD model compared ‘basecase’ dynamics to strategic approaches to deploying continuous technical assistance (TA) and performance feedback reporting (PFR). The basecase effectively represented the SBIRT intervention, which reflected actual monthly volume of adolescent primary care visits (N = 9639), screenings (N = 5937), positive screenings (N = 246), and brief interventions (BIs; N = 50) over the 20-month implementation period. Insights gained suggest that implementation outcomes are sensitive to frequency of PFR, with bimonthly events generating the most rapid and sustained screening results. Simulated trends indicated that availability of the BHC directly impacts success of the specialist model. Similarly, understanding PCPs’ perception of severity of need for intervention is key to outcomes in either condition.",
author = "Lounsbury, {David W.} and Mitchell, {Shannon Gwin} and Dusek, {Kristi Ann} and Li, {Josh Zhi} and Kirk, {Arethusa S.} and Marla Oros and Colleen Hosler and Schwartz, {Robert P.} and Jan Gryczynski and Monico, {Laura B.} and Brown, {Barry S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11414-019-09650-y",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research",
issn = "1094-3412",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of System Dynamics to Inform a Model of Adolescent SBIRT Implementation in Primary Care Settings

AU - Lounsbury, David W.

AU - Mitchell, Shannon Gwin

AU - Dusek, Kristi Ann

AU - Li, Josh Zhi

AU - Kirk, Arethusa S.

AU - Oros, Marla

AU - Hosler, Colleen

AU - Schwartz, Robert P.

AU - Gryczynski, Jan

AU - Monico, Laura B.

AU - Brown, Barry S.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - System dynamics (SD) modeling is used to compare and contrast strategies for effective implementation of an evidence-based adolescent behavioral health treatment in primary care settings. With qualitative and quantitative data from an on-going cluster-randomized trial in 7 federally qualified health center sites, two implementation conditions were compared: generalist vs. specialist. In the generalist approach, the primary care provider (PCP) delivered brief intervention (BI) for substance misuse (n = 4 clinics). In the specialist approach, BIs were delivered by behavioral health counselors (BHCs) (n = 3 clinics). The resultant SD model compared ‘basecase’ dynamics to strategic approaches to deploying continuous technical assistance (TA) and performance feedback reporting (PFR). The basecase effectively represented the SBIRT intervention, which reflected actual monthly volume of adolescent primary care visits (N = 9639), screenings (N = 5937), positive screenings (N = 246), and brief interventions (BIs; N = 50) over the 20-month implementation period. Insights gained suggest that implementation outcomes are sensitive to frequency of PFR, with bimonthly events generating the most rapid and sustained screening results. Simulated trends indicated that availability of the BHC directly impacts success of the specialist model. Similarly, understanding PCPs’ perception of severity of need for intervention is key to outcomes in either condition.

AB - System dynamics (SD) modeling is used to compare and contrast strategies for effective implementation of an evidence-based adolescent behavioral health treatment in primary care settings. With qualitative and quantitative data from an on-going cluster-randomized trial in 7 federally qualified health center sites, two implementation conditions were compared: generalist vs. specialist. In the generalist approach, the primary care provider (PCP) delivered brief intervention (BI) for substance misuse (n = 4 clinics). In the specialist approach, BIs were delivered by behavioral health counselors (BHCs) (n = 3 clinics). The resultant SD model compared ‘basecase’ dynamics to strategic approaches to deploying continuous technical assistance (TA) and performance feedback reporting (PFR). The basecase effectively represented the SBIRT intervention, which reflected actual monthly volume of adolescent primary care visits (N = 9639), screenings (N = 5937), positive screenings (N = 246), and brief interventions (BIs; N = 50) over the 20-month implementation period. Insights gained suggest that implementation outcomes are sensitive to frequency of PFR, with bimonthly events generating the most rapid and sustained screening results. Simulated trends indicated that availability of the BHC directly impacts success of the specialist model. Similarly, understanding PCPs’ perception of severity of need for intervention is key to outcomes in either condition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067922655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067922655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11414-019-09650-y

DO - 10.1007/s11414-019-09650-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067922655

JO - Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

JF - Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

SN - 1094-3412

ER -