Analysis of visual fields following excimer laser PRK

J. L. Abramson, C. E. Cuite, Jeffrey S. Schultz, P. S. Hersh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: We report the results of a prospective study that evaluated the effects of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on static visual field tests. Methods: The Humphrey Analyzer 81-Point Screening Tests were given to 103 patients preoperatively and then one and two years after PRK. After exclusion criteria were met, the number of eligible patients for the one year study was 75 and for the two year study, the number of patients was 45. The fields were compared regarding the 1) points missed in the central (<30°) or peripheral (>30°) field, and 2) central or peripheral estimates of sensitivity (C/PECS). T-tests and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests assessed the association between change in sensitivity and pupil diameter, optical zone size, and attempted diopters of correction. A correlation coefficient was calculated for an association between change in sensitivity and haze. Results: PRK did not appear to affect points missed on static perimetry. Estimates of differential light sensitivity (threshold) were statistically decreased centrally and approached significance peripherally two years after PRK. However, these decreased estimates were no specifically associated with changes in optical zone size or anterior stromal haze. There may be interface related changes in some patients as evidenced by two patients with circular patterns of visual field defects. Conclusions: The clinical significance of these subtle decreases in central threshold estimates remains unknown; it is possible that a study using threshold testing may better assess the effects of PRK on estimates of sensitivity. PRK did not appear to grossly affect visual field performance as analyzed by the Humphrey 81-Point Screening Test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume37
Issue number3
StatePublished - Feb 15 1996

Fingerprint

Laser Corneal Surgery
Photorefractive Keratectomy
Excimer Lasers
Visual Fields
Visual Field Tests
Nonparametric Statistics
Photophobia
Pupil
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Analysis of visual fields following excimer laser PRK. / Abramson, J. L.; Cuite, C. E.; Schultz, Jeffrey S.; Hersh, P. S.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 37, No. 3, 15.02.1996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b97e3f661dc24d7fa96be19004d49324,
title = "Analysis of visual fields following excimer laser PRK",
abstract = "Purpose: We report the results of a prospective study that evaluated the effects of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on static visual field tests. Methods: The Humphrey Analyzer 81-Point Screening Tests were given to 103 patients preoperatively and then one and two years after PRK. After exclusion criteria were met, the number of eligible patients for the one year study was 75 and for the two year study, the number of patients was 45. The fields were compared regarding the 1) points missed in the central (<30°) or peripheral (>30°) field, and 2) central or peripheral estimates of sensitivity (C/PECS). T-tests and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests assessed the association between change in sensitivity and pupil diameter, optical zone size, and attempted diopters of correction. A correlation coefficient was calculated for an association between change in sensitivity and haze. Results: PRK did not appear to affect points missed on static perimetry. Estimates of differential light sensitivity (threshold) were statistically decreased centrally and approached significance peripherally two years after PRK. However, these decreased estimates were no specifically associated with changes in optical zone size or anterior stromal haze. There may be interface related changes in some patients as evidenced by two patients with circular patterns of visual field defects. Conclusions: The clinical significance of these subtle decreases in central threshold estimates remains unknown; it is possible that a study using threshold testing may better assess the effects of PRK on estimates of sensitivity. PRK did not appear to grossly affect visual field performance as analyzed by the Humphrey 81-Point Screening Test.",
author = "Abramson, {J. L.} and Cuite, {C. E.} and Schultz, {Jeffrey S.} and Hersh, {P. S.}",
year = "1996",
month = "2",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of visual fields following excimer laser PRK

AU - Abramson, J. L.

AU - Cuite, C. E.

AU - Schultz, Jeffrey S.

AU - Hersh, P. S.

PY - 1996/2/15

Y1 - 1996/2/15

N2 - Purpose: We report the results of a prospective study that evaluated the effects of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on static visual field tests. Methods: The Humphrey Analyzer 81-Point Screening Tests were given to 103 patients preoperatively and then one and two years after PRK. After exclusion criteria were met, the number of eligible patients for the one year study was 75 and for the two year study, the number of patients was 45. The fields were compared regarding the 1) points missed in the central (<30°) or peripheral (>30°) field, and 2) central or peripheral estimates of sensitivity (C/PECS). T-tests and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests assessed the association between change in sensitivity and pupil diameter, optical zone size, and attempted diopters of correction. A correlation coefficient was calculated for an association between change in sensitivity and haze. Results: PRK did not appear to affect points missed on static perimetry. Estimates of differential light sensitivity (threshold) were statistically decreased centrally and approached significance peripherally two years after PRK. However, these decreased estimates were no specifically associated with changes in optical zone size or anterior stromal haze. There may be interface related changes in some patients as evidenced by two patients with circular patterns of visual field defects. Conclusions: The clinical significance of these subtle decreases in central threshold estimates remains unknown; it is possible that a study using threshold testing may better assess the effects of PRK on estimates of sensitivity. PRK did not appear to grossly affect visual field performance as analyzed by the Humphrey 81-Point Screening Test.

AB - Purpose: We report the results of a prospective study that evaluated the effects of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on static visual field tests. Methods: The Humphrey Analyzer 81-Point Screening Tests were given to 103 patients preoperatively and then one and two years after PRK. After exclusion criteria were met, the number of eligible patients for the one year study was 75 and for the two year study, the number of patients was 45. The fields were compared regarding the 1) points missed in the central (<30°) or peripheral (>30°) field, and 2) central or peripheral estimates of sensitivity (C/PECS). T-tests and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests assessed the association between change in sensitivity and pupil diameter, optical zone size, and attempted diopters of correction. A correlation coefficient was calculated for an association between change in sensitivity and haze. Results: PRK did not appear to affect points missed on static perimetry. Estimates of differential light sensitivity (threshold) were statistically decreased centrally and approached significance peripherally two years after PRK. However, these decreased estimates were no specifically associated with changes in optical zone size or anterior stromal haze. There may be interface related changes in some patients as evidenced by two patients with circular patterns of visual field defects. Conclusions: The clinical significance of these subtle decreases in central threshold estimates remains unknown; it is possible that a study using threshold testing may better assess the effects of PRK on estimates of sensitivity. PRK did not appear to grossly affect visual field performance as analyzed by the Humphrey 81-Point Screening Test.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750147286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750147286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 37

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

IS - 3

ER -