Analysis of secondary outcomes in nested case-control study designs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the main perceived advantages of using a case-cohort design compared with a nested case-control design in an epidemiologic study is the ability to evaluate with the same subcohort outcomes other than the primary outcome of interest. In this paper, we show that valid inferences about secondary outcomes can also be achieved in nested case-control studies by using the inclusion probability weighting method in combination with an approximate jackknife standard error that can be computed using existing software. Simulation studies demonstrate that when the sample size is sufficient, this approach yields valid type 1 error and coverage rates for the analysis of secondary outcomes in nested case-control designs. Interestingly, the statistical power of the nested case-control design was comparable with that of the case-cohort design when the primary and secondary outcomes were positively correlated. The proposed method is illustrated with the data from a cohort in Cardiovascular Health Study to study the association of C-reactive protein levels and the incidence of congestive heart failure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4215-4226
Number of pages12
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume33
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Case-control Study
Control Design
Case-Control Studies
Case-control
Case-cohort Design
C-Reactive Protein
Sample Size
Epidemiologic Studies
Software
Heart Failure
Valid
Congestive Heart Failure
Incidence
Inclusion Probabilities
Health
Statistical Power
Jackknife
Standard error
Weighting
Coverage

Keywords

  • Incidence density sampling
  • Nested case-control design
  • Secondary outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

Analysis of secondary outcomes in nested case-control study designs. / Kim, Ryung S.; Kaplan, Robert C.

In: Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 24, 2014, p. 4215-4226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{44f25deef02b42eeaa3f993acb8d92af,
title = "Analysis of secondary outcomes in nested case-control study designs",
abstract = "One of the main perceived advantages of using a case-cohort design compared with a nested case-control design in an epidemiologic study is the ability to evaluate with the same subcohort outcomes other than the primary outcome of interest. In this paper, we show that valid inferences about secondary outcomes can also be achieved in nested case-control studies by using the inclusion probability weighting method in combination with an approximate jackknife standard error that can be computed using existing software. Simulation studies demonstrate that when the sample size is sufficient, this approach yields valid type 1 error and coverage rates for the analysis of secondary outcomes in nested case-control designs. Interestingly, the statistical power of the nested case-control design was comparable with that of the case-cohort design when the primary and secondary outcomes were positively correlated. The proposed method is illustrated with the data from a cohort in Cardiovascular Health Study to study the association of C-reactive protein levels and the incidence of congestive heart failure.",
keywords = "Incidence density sampling, Nested case-control design, Secondary outcomes",
author = "Kim, {Ryung S.} and Kaplan, {Robert C.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/sim.6231",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "4215--4226",
journal = "Statistics in Medicine",
issn = "0277-6715",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "24",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of secondary outcomes in nested case-control study designs

AU - Kim, Ryung S.

AU - Kaplan, Robert C.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - One of the main perceived advantages of using a case-cohort design compared with a nested case-control design in an epidemiologic study is the ability to evaluate with the same subcohort outcomes other than the primary outcome of interest. In this paper, we show that valid inferences about secondary outcomes can also be achieved in nested case-control studies by using the inclusion probability weighting method in combination with an approximate jackknife standard error that can be computed using existing software. Simulation studies demonstrate that when the sample size is sufficient, this approach yields valid type 1 error and coverage rates for the analysis of secondary outcomes in nested case-control designs. Interestingly, the statistical power of the nested case-control design was comparable with that of the case-cohort design when the primary and secondary outcomes were positively correlated. The proposed method is illustrated with the data from a cohort in Cardiovascular Health Study to study the association of C-reactive protein levels and the incidence of congestive heart failure.

AB - One of the main perceived advantages of using a case-cohort design compared with a nested case-control design in an epidemiologic study is the ability to evaluate with the same subcohort outcomes other than the primary outcome of interest. In this paper, we show that valid inferences about secondary outcomes can also be achieved in nested case-control studies by using the inclusion probability weighting method in combination with an approximate jackknife standard error that can be computed using existing software. Simulation studies demonstrate that when the sample size is sufficient, this approach yields valid type 1 error and coverage rates for the analysis of secondary outcomes in nested case-control designs. Interestingly, the statistical power of the nested case-control design was comparable with that of the case-cohort design when the primary and secondary outcomes were positively correlated. The proposed method is illustrated with the data from a cohort in Cardiovascular Health Study to study the association of C-reactive protein levels and the incidence of congestive heart failure.

KW - Incidence density sampling

KW - Nested case-control design

KW - Secondary outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908068930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908068930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sim.6231

DO - 10.1002/sim.6231

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 4215

EP - 4226

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

SN - 0277-6715

IS - 24

ER -