An evidence-based determination of issues affecting quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in lung cancer: Results of a survey of 660 patients

Richard J. Gralla, Patricia J. Hollen, Pavlos Msaouel, Beverly Vincent Davis, Judith Petersen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Identifying issues of importance for patients with lung cancer is critical in individualizing care and developing effective quality of life instruments based on evidence. This study was conducted to provide enhanced content validity for measures assessing quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: We conducted an anonymous, cross-sectional, electronic web-based survey of 660 lung cancer patients. The survey asked patients to rank 20 quality of life issues on a 5-point scale ranging from "not important at all" to "very important". Analysis was obtained using key factors such as stage of disease, performance status, and gender. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 297 males and 363 females (median age 62 years). The top five rated issues were: quality of life, maintaining independence, ability to perform normal activities, ability to sleep, and not being fatigued. The issues of importance were all ranked, using the two highest categories ("very important" and "important") by at least 90% of patients. Although symptoms are important to patients, they were not the most highly ranked issues of concern; instead, global issues illustrating the effect of the symptoms on the patient, such as quality of life, maintaining independence, and performing normal activities were ranked highest. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest analysis of evidence-based data determining content validity for quality of life and PROs as indicated by patients. These results provide greater confidence that the content of lung cancer quality of life measures is appropriate. In addition, the survey clearly demonstrates that PRO measures that only evaluate symptoms are not fully responding to patient-expressed needs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1243-1248
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume9
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Lung Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Aptitude
Surveys and Questionnaires
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Sleep

Keywords

  • Content validity
  • Lung cancer
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

An evidence-based determination of issues affecting quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in lung cancer : Results of a survey of 660 patients. / Gralla, Richard J.; Hollen, Patricia J.; Msaouel, Pavlos; Davis, Beverly Vincent; Petersen, Judith.

In: Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Vol. 9, No. 9, 2014, p. 1243-1248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gralla, Richard J. ; Hollen, Patricia J. ; Msaouel, Pavlos ; Davis, Beverly Vincent ; Petersen, Judith. / An evidence-based determination of issues affecting quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in lung cancer : Results of a survey of 660 patients. In: Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 9. pp. 1243-1248.
@article{c9579fc87bc24b74a7e07ccf727b9d6f,
title = "An evidence-based determination of issues affecting quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in lung cancer: Results of a survey of 660 patients",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Identifying issues of importance for patients with lung cancer is critical in individualizing care and developing effective quality of life instruments based on evidence. This study was conducted to provide enhanced content validity for measures assessing quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: We conducted an anonymous, cross-sectional, electronic web-based survey of 660 lung cancer patients. The survey asked patients to rank 20 quality of life issues on a 5-point scale ranging from {"}not important at all{"} to {"}very important{"}. Analysis was obtained using key factors such as stage of disease, performance status, and gender. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 297 males and 363 females (median age 62 years). The top five rated issues were: quality of life, maintaining independence, ability to perform normal activities, ability to sleep, and not being fatigued. The issues of importance were all ranked, using the two highest categories ({"}very important{"} and {"}important{"}) by at least 90{\%} of patients. Although symptoms are important to patients, they were not the most highly ranked issues of concern; instead, global issues illustrating the effect of the symptoms on the patient, such as quality of life, maintaining independence, and performing normal activities were ranked highest. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest analysis of evidence-based data determining content validity for quality of life and PROs as indicated by patients. These results provide greater confidence that the content of lung cancer quality of life measures is appropriate. In addition, the survey clearly demonstrates that PRO measures that only evaluate symptoms are not fully responding to patient-expressed needs.",
keywords = "Content validity, Lung cancer, Quality of life",
author = "Gralla, {Richard J.} and Hollen, {Patricia J.} and Pavlos Msaouel and Davis, {Beverly Vincent} and Judith Petersen",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/JTO.0000000000000244",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1243--1248",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic Oncology",
issn = "1556-0864",
publisher = "International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evidence-based determination of issues affecting quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in lung cancer

T2 - Results of a survey of 660 patients

AU - Gralla, Richard J.

AU - Hollen, Patricia J.

AU - Msaouel, Pavlos

AU - Davis, Beverly Vincent

AU - Petersen, Judith

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Identifying issues of importance for patients with lung cancer is critical in individualizing care and developing effective quality of life instruments based on evidence. This study was conducted to provide enhanced content validity for measures assessing quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: We conducted an anonymous, cross-sectional, electronic web-based survey of 660 lung cancer patients. The survey asked patients to rank 20 quality of life issues on a 5-point scale ranging from "not important at all" to "very important". Analysis was obtained using key factors such as stage of disease, performance status, and gender. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 297 males and 363 females (median age 62 years). The top five rated issues were: quality of life, maintaining independence, ability to perform normal activities, ability to sleep, and not being fatigued. The issues of importance were all ranked, using the two highest categories ("very important" and "important") by at least 90% of patients. Although symptoms are important to patients, they were not the most highly ranked issues of concern; instead, global issues illustrating the effect of the symptoms on the patient, such as quality of life, maintaining independence, and performing normal activities were ranked highest. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest analysis of evidence-based data determining content validity for quality of life and PROs as indicated by patients. These results provide greater confidence that the content of lung cancer quality of life measures is appropriate. In addition, the survey clearly demonstrates that PRO measures that only evaluate symptoms are not fully responding to patient-expressed needs.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Identifying issues of importance for patients with lung cancer is critical in individualizing care and developing effective quality of life instruments based on evidence. This study was conducted to provide enhanced content validity for measures assessing quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: We conducted an anonymous, cross-sectional, electronic web-based survey of 660 lung cancer patients. The survey asked patients to rank 20 quality of life issues on a 5-point scale ranging from "not important at all" to "very important". Analysis was obtained using key factors such as stage of disease, performance status, and gender. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 297 males and 363 females (median age 62 years). The top five rated issues were: quality of life, maintaining independence, ability to perform normal activities, ability to sleep, and not being fatigued. The issues of importance were all ranked, using the two highest categories ("very important" and "important") by at least 90% of patients. Although symptoms are important to patients, they were not the most highly ranked issues of concern; instead, global issues illustrating the effect of the symptoms on the patient, such as quality of life, maintaining independence, and performing normal activities were ranked highest. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest analysis of evidence-based data determining content validity for quality of life and PROs as indicated by patients. These results provide greater confidence that the content of lung cancer quality of life measures is appropriate. In addition, the survey clearly demonstrates that PRO measures that only evaluate symptoms are not fully responding to patient-expressed needs.

KW - Content validity

KW - Lung cancer

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906262881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906262881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000244

DO - 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000244

M3 - Article

C2 - 25122420

AN - SCOPUS:84906262881

VL - 9

SP - 1243

EP - 1248

JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology

JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology

SN - 1556-0864

IS - 9

ER -