An ethics committee to aid in implementing a randomized clinical trial

Ruth E. K. Stein, Dorothy Jones Jessop

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Individuals who care for children are sometimes reluctant to participate in experimental research because of concern about withholding a potentially helpful intervention from some of their patients and their impressions about the effects of the treatment being studied. These concerns may conflict with investigators' interests in obtaining subjects for protocols. This report describes the use of an external review committee to assess the appropriateness of enrolling patients in a randomized clinical trial. The committee served as a mechanism for assessing the validity of physicians' concerns about randomization of a given patient and for reconciling clinicians' differences about enrollment. It appears to have helped implement randomization by affording a procedure to ensure patients' rights and quality of care. It is offered as a technique for resolving the practical dilemmas of those conducting clinical research while at the same time respecting the rights of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-42
Number of pages6
JournalControlled Clinical Trials
Volume4
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983

Fingerprint

Ethics Committees
Randomized Controlled Trials
Patient Rights
Random Allocation
Quality of Health Care
Advisory Committees
Child Care
Research
Research Personnel
Physicians
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • clinical trials
  • ethics
  • experimental design
  • randomization
  • research procedures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

An ethics committee to aid in implementing a randomized clinical trial. / Stein, Ruth E. K.; Jessop, Dorothy Jones.

In: Controlled Clinical Trials, Vol. 4, No. 1-2, 1983, p. 37-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fd9c2fc338d74cf1a152a9457cf15714,
title = "An ethics committee to aid in implementing a randomized clinical trial",
abstract = "Individuals who care for children are sometimes reluctant to participate in experimental research because of concern about withholding a potentially helpful intervention from some of their patients and their impressions about the effects of the treatment being studied. These concerns may conflict with investigators' interests in obtaining subjects for protocols. This report describes the use of an external review committee to assess the appropriateness of enrolling patients in a randomized clinical trial. The committee served as a mechanism for assessing the validity of physicians' concerns about randomization of a given patient and for reconciling clinicians' differences about enrollment. It appears to have helped implement randomization by affording a procedure to ensure patients' rights and quality of care. It is offered as a technique for resolving the practical dilemmas of those conducting clinical research while at the same time respecting the rights of patients.",
keywords = "clinical trials, ethics, experimental design, randomization, research procedures",
author = "Stein, {Ruth E. K.} and Jessop, {Dorothy Jones}",
year = "1983",
doi = "10.1016/S0197-2456(83)80010-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "37--42",
journal = "Controlled Clinical Trials",
issn = "0197-2456",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An ethics committee to aid in implementing a randomized clinical trial

AU - Stein, Ruth E. K.

AU - Jessop, Dorothy Jones

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - Individuals who care for children are sometimes reluctant to participate in experimental research because of concern about withholding a potentially helpful intervention from some of their patients and their impressions about the effects of the treatment being studied. These concerns may conflict with investigators' interests in obtaining subjects for protocols. This report describes the use of an external review committee to assess the appropriateness of enrolling patients in a randomized clinical trial. The committee served as a mechanism for assessing the validity of physicians' concerns about randomization of a given patient and for reconciling clinicians' differences about enrollment. It appears to have helped implement randomization by affording a procedure to ensure patients' rights and quality of care. It is offered as a technique for resolving the practical dilemmas of those conducting clinical research while at the same time respecting the rights of patients.

AB - Individuals who care for children are sometimes reluctant to participate in experimental research because of concern about withholding a potentially helpful intervention from some of their patients and their impressions about the effects of the treatment being studied. These concerns may conflict with investigators' interests in obtaining subjects for protocols. This report describes the use of an external review committee to assess the appropriateness of enrolling patients in a randomized clinical trial. The committee served as a mechanism for assessing the validity of physicians' concerns about randomization of a given patient and for reconciling clinicians' differences about enrollment. It appears to have helped implement randomization by affording a procedure to ensure patients' rights and quality of care. It is offered as a technique for resolving the practical dilemmas of those conducting clinical research while at the same time respecting the rights of patients.

KW - clinical trials

KW - ethics

KW - experimental design

KW - randomization

KW - research procedures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020580808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020580808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0197-2456(83)80010-5

DO - 10.1016/S0197-2456(83)80010-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 6851581

AN - SCOPUS:0020580808

VL - 4

SP - 37

EP - 42

JO - Controlled Clinical Trials

JF - Controlled Clinical Trials

SN - 0197-2456

IS - 1-2

ER -