Aligning quality and payment for heart failure care

Defining the challenges

Edward P. Havranek, Harlan M. Krumholz, R. Adams Dudley, Kirkwood Adams, Douglas Gregory, Steven Lampert, Joann Lindenfeld, Barry M. Massie, Ileana L. Pina, Susan Restaino, Michael W. Rich, Marvin A. Konstam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hospitals may not support programs that improve the quality of care delivered to heart failure patients because these programs lower readmission rates and empty beds, and therefore further diminish already-declining revenues. A conflict between the highest quality of care and financial solvency does not serve the interests of patients, physicians, hospitals, or payers. In principle, resolution of this conflict-is simple: reimbursement systems should reward higher quality care. In practice, resolving the conflict is not simple. A recent roundtable discussion sponsored by the Heart Failure Society of America identified 4 major challenges to the design and implementation of reimbursement schemes that promote higher quality care for heart failure: defining quality, accounting for differences in disease severity, crafting novel payment mechanisms, and overcoming professional parochialism. This article describes each of these challenges in turn.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-254
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Cardiac Failure
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Heart Failure
Negotiating
Reward
Physicians
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Heart failure management
  • Quality of care
  • Reimbursement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Havranek, E. P., Krumholz, H. M., Dudley, R. A., Adams, K., Gregory, D., Lampert, S., ... Konstam, M. A. (2003). Aligning quality and payment for heart failure care: Defining the challenges. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 9(4), 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcaf.2003.30

Aligning quality and payment for heart failure care : Defining the challenges. / Havranek, Edward P.; Krumholz, Harlan M.; Dudley, R. Adams; Adams, Kirkwood; Gregory, Douglas; Lampert, Steven; Lindenfeld, Joann; Massie, Barry M.; Pina, Ileana L.; Restaino, Susan; Rich, Michael W.; Konstam, Marvin A.

In: Journal of Cardiac Failure, Vol. 9, No. 4, 08.2003, p. 251-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Havranek, EP, Krumholz, HM, Dudley, RA, Adams, K, Gregory, D, Lampert, S, Lindenfeld, J, Massie, BM, Pina, IL, Restaino, S, Rich, MW & Konstam, MA 2003, 'Aligning quality and payment for heart failure care: Defining the challenges', Journal of Cardiac Failure, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcaf.2003.30
Havranek EP, Krumholz HM, Dudley RA, Adams K, Gregory D, Lampert S et al. Aligning quality and payment for heart failure care: Defining the challenges. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2003 Aug;9(4):251-254. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcaf.2003.30
Havranek, Edward P. ; Krumholz, Harlan M. ; Dudley, R. Adams ; Adams, Kirkwood ; Gregory, Douglas ; Lampert, Steven ; Lindenfeld, Joann ; Massie, Barry M. ; Pina, Ileana L. ; Restaino, Susan ; Rich, Michael W. ; Konstam, Marvin A. / Aligning quality and payment for heart failure care : Defining the challenges. In: Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2003 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 251-254.
@article{181a89c15cd74dd2abfa4de0ac13d5e7,
title = "Aligning quality and payment for heart failure care: Defining the challenges",
abstract = "Hospitals may not support programs that improve the quality of care delivered to heart failure patients because these programs lower readmission rates and empty beds, and therefore further diminish already-declining revenues. A conflict between the highest quality of care and financial solvency does not serve the interests of patients, physicians, hospitals, or payers. In principle, resolution of this conflict-is simple: reimbursement systems should reward higher quality care. In practice, resolving the conflict is not simple. A recent roundtable discussion sponsored by the Heart Failure Society of America identified 4 major challenges to the design and implementation of reimbursement schemes that promote higher quality care for heart failure: defining quality, accounting for differences in disease severity, crafting novel payment mechanisms, and overcoming professional parochialism. This article describes each of these challenges in turn.",
keywords = "Heart failure management, Quality of care, Reimbursement",
author = "Havranek, {Edward P.} and Krumholz, {Harlan M.} and Dudley, {R. Adams} and Kirkwood Adams and Douglas Gregory and Steven Lampert and Joann Lindenfeld and Massie, {Barry M.} and Pina, {Ileana L.} and Susan Restaino and Rich, {Michael W.} and Konstam, {Marvin A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1054/jcaf.2003.30",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "251--254",
journal = "Journal of Cardiac Failure",
issn = "1071-9164",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aligning quality and payment for heart failure care

T2 - Defining the challenges

AU - Havranek, Edward P.

AU - Krumholz, Harlan M.

AU - Dudley, R. Adams

AU - Adams, Kirkwood

AU - Gregory, Douglas

AU - Lampert, Steven

AU - Lindenfeld, Joann

AU - Massie, Barry M.

AU - Pina, Ileana L.

AU - Restaino, Susan

AU - Rich, Michael W.

AU - Konstam, Marvin A.

PY - 2003/8

Y1 - 2003/8

N2 - Hospitals may not support programs that improve the quality of care delivered to heart failure patients because these programs lower readmission rates and empty beds, and therefore further diminish already-declining revenues. A conflict between the highest quality of care and financial solvency does not serve the interests of patients, physicians, hospitals, or payers. In principle, resolution of this conflict-is simple: reimbursement systems should reward higher quality care. In practice, resolving the conflict is not simple. A recent roundtable discussion sponsored by the Heart Failure Society of America identified 4 major challenges to the design and implementation of reimbursement schemes that promote higher quality care for heart failure: defining quality, accounting for differences in disease severity, crafting novel payment mechanisms, and overcoming professional parochialism. This article describes each of these challenges in turn.

AB - Hospitals may not support programs that improve the quality of care delivered to heart failure patients because these programs lower readmission rates and empty beds, and therefore further diminish already-declining revenues. A conflict between the highest quality of care and financial solvency does not serve the interests of patients, physicians, hospitals, or payers. In principle, resolution of this conflict-is simple: reimbursement systems should reward higher quality care. In practice, resolving the conflict is not simple. A recent roundtable discussion sponsored by the Heart Failure Society of America identified 4 major challenges to the design and implementation of reimbursement schemes that promote higher quality care for heart failure: defining quality, accounting for differences in disease severity, crafting novel payment mechanisms, and overcoming professional parochialism. This article describes each of these challenges in turn.

KW - Heart failure management

KW - Quality of care

KW - Reimbursement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10744224297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10744224297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1054/jcaf.2003.30

DO - 10.1054/jcaf.2003.30

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 251

EP - 254

JO - Journal of Cardiac Failure

JF - Journal of Cardiac Failure

SN - 1071-9164

IS - 4

ER -