TY - JOUR
T1 - Agreement of the Resting Distal to Aortic Coronary Pressure With the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio
AU - on behalf of the
AU - CONTRAST Study Investigators
AU - Kobayashi, Yuhei
AU - Johnson, Nils P.
AU - Zimmermann, Frederik M.
AU - Witt, Nils
AU - Berry, Colin
AU - Jeremias, Allen
AU - Koo, Bon Kwon
AU - Esposito, Giovanni
AU - Rioufol, Gilles
AU - Park, Seung Jung
AU - Nishi, Takeshi
AU - Choi, Dong Hyun
AU - Oldroyd, Keith G.
AU - Barbato, Emanuele
AU - Pijls, Nico H.J.
AU - De Bruyne, Bernard
AU - Fearon, William F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2017/10/24
Y1 - 2017/10/24
N2 - Background: Recently, 2 randomized controlled trials showed that the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), a resting coronary physiological index, is noninferior to fractional flow reserve for guiding revascularization. The resting distal to aortic coronary pressure (Pd/Pa) measured at rest is another adenosine-free index widely available in the cardiac catheterization laboratory; however, little is known about the agreement of Pd/Pa using iFR as a reference standard. Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate the agreement of Pd/Pa with iFR. Methods: A total of 763 patients were prospectively enrolled from 12 institutions. iFR and Pd/Pa were measured under resting conditions. Using iFR ≤0.89 as a reference standard, the agreement of Pd/Pa and its best cutoff value were assessed. Results: According to the independent core laboratory analysis, iFR and Pd/Pa were analyzable in 627 and 733 patients (82.2% vs. 96.1%; p < 0.001), respectively. The median iFR and Pd/Pa were 0.90 (interquartile range: 0.85 to 0.94) and 0.92 (interquartile range: 0.88 to 0.95), and the 2 indices were highly correlated (R2 = 0.93; p < 0.001; iFR = 1.31 * Pd/Pa –0.31). According to the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, Pd/Pa showed excellent agreement (area under the curve: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.97 to 0.99; p < 0.001) with a best cutoff value of Pd/Pa ≤0.91. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 93.0%, 91.4%, 94.4%, 93.3%, and 92.7%, respectively. These results were similar in patients with acute coronary syndrome and stable angina. Conclusions: Pd/Pa was analyzable in a significantly higher number of patients than iFR. Pd/Pa showed excellent agreement with iFR, suggesting that it could be applied clinically in a similar fashion.
AB - Background: Recently, 2 randomized controlled trials showed that the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), a resting coronary physiological index, is noninferior to fractional flow reserve for guiding revascularization. The resting distal to aortic coronary pressure (Pd/Pa) measured at rest is another adenosine-free index widely available in the cardiac catheterization laboratory; however, little is known about the agreement of Pd/Pa using iFR as a reference standard. Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate the agreement of Pd/Pa with iFR. Methods: A total of 763 patients were prospectively enrolled from 12 institutions. iFR and Pd/Pa were measured under resting conditions. Using iFR ≤0.89 as a reference standard, the agreement of Pd/Pa and its best cutoff value were assessed. Results: According to the independent core laboratory analysis, iFR and Pd/Pa were analyzable in 627 and 733 patients (82.2% vs. 96.1%; p < 0.001), respectively. The median iFR and Pd/Pa were 0.90 (interquartile range: 0.85 to 0.94) and 0.92 (interquartile range: 0.88 to 0.95), and the 2 indices were highly correlated (R2 = 0.93; p < 0.001; iFR = 1.31 * Pd/Pa –0.31). According to the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, Pd/Pa showed excellent agreement (area under the curve: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.97 to 0.99; p < 0.001) with a best cutoff value of Pd/Pa ≤0.91. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 93.0%, 91.4%, 94.4%, 93.3%, and 92.7%, respectively. These results were similar in patients with acute coronary syndrome and stable angina. Conclusions: Pd/Pa was analyzable in a significantly higher number of patients than iFR. Pd/Pa showed excellent agreement with iFR, suggesting that it could be applied clinically in a similar fashion.
KW - fractional flow reserve
KW - instantaneous wave-free ratio
KW - resting distal to aortic coronary pressure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032169946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032169946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.049
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.049
M3 - Article
C2 - 29050557
AN - SCOPUS:85032169946
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 70
SP - 2105
EP - 2113
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 17
ER -