TY - JOUR
T1 - Adherence to embryo transfer guidelines in favorable-prognosis patients aged less than 35 years using autologous oocytes and in recipients using donor oocytes
T2 - a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System study
AU - Gingold, Julian A.
AU - Fazzari, Melissa
AU - Gerber, Rachel
AU - Kappy, Michelle
AU - Goodman, Michelle
AU - Lieman, Harry
AU - Pollack, Staci
AU - Singh, Manvinder
AU - Jindal, Sangita
N1 - Funding Information:
The SART thanks all of its members for providing clinical information to the SART CORS database for use by patients and researchers. Without the efforts of our members, this research would not have been possible. DIALOG: You can discuss this article with its authors and other readers at https://www.fertstertdialog.com/posts/33427
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society for Reproductive Medicine
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Objective: To measure the consequences of nonadherence with the 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine elective single embryo transfer (eSET) guidelines for favorable-prognosis patients. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: In vitro fertilization clinics. Patient(s): A total of 28,311 fresh autologous, 2,500 frozen-thawed autologous, and 3,534 fresh oocyte-donor in vitro fertilization cycles in 2014–2016 at Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology-reporting centers. Intervention(s): Patients aged <35 years or using donors aged <35 years underwent first blastocyst transfer. Main Outcome Measure(s): Singleton birth rate, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight were compared between the eSET and non-eSET groups using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test or t-tests. Result(s): Among fresh transfers, 15,643 (55%) underwent eSET. Live births after non-eSETs were less likely singletons (38.0% vs. 96.5%; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.56) and more likely complicated by preterm delivery (55.0% vs. 20.1%; aRR, 2.39) and low birth weight (<2,500 g) (40.1% vs. 10.6%; aRR, 3.4) compared with those after eSET. Among frozen-thawed transfers, 1,439 (58%) underwent eSET. Live births after non-eSETs were less likely singletons (41.9% vs. 95.2%; aRR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.66–0.73) and more likely complicated by preterm delivery (56.4% vs. 19.5%; aRR, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.2–3.1) and low birth weight (38.0% vs. 8.9%; aRR, 3.9) compared with those after eSET. Among fresh donor oocyte transfers, 1,946 (55%) underwent eSET. Live births after non-eSETs were less likely singletons (31.3% vs. 97.3%; aRR, 0.48) and more likely complicated by preterm delivery (61.1% vs. 25.7%; aRR, 2.09) and low birth weight (44.3% vs. 11.7%; aRR, 3.39) compared with those after eSET. Conclusion(s): Nonadherence with transfer guidelines was associated with dramatically increased multiple pregnancies, preterm births, and low birth weights.
AB - Objective: To measure the consequences of nonadherence with the 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine elective single embryo transfer (eSET) guidelines for favorable-prognosis patients. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: In vitro fertilization clinics. Patient(s): A total of 28,311 fresh autologous, 2,500 frozen-thawed autologous, and 3,534 fresh oocyte-donor in vitro fertilization cycles in 2014–2016 at Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology-reporting centers. Intervention(s): Patients aged <35 years or using donors aged <35 years underwent first blastocyst transfer. Main Outcome Measure(s): Singleton birth rate, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight were compared between the eSET and non-eSET groups using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test or t-tests. Result(s): Among fresh transfers, 15,643 (55%) underwent eSET. Live births after non-eSETs were less likely singletons (38.0% vs. 96.5%; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.56) and more likely complicated by preterm delivery (55.0% vs. 20.1%; aRR, 2.39) and low birth weight (<2,500 g) (40.1% vs. 10.6%; aRR, 3.4) compared with those after eSET. Among frozen-thawed transfers, 1,439 (58%) underwent eSET. Live births after non-eSETs were less likely singletons (41.9% vs. 95.2%; aRR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.66–0.73) and more likely complicated by preterm delivery (56.4% vs. 19.5%; aRR, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.2–3.1) and low birth weight (38.0% vs. 8.9%; aRR, 3.9) compared with those after eSET. Among fresh donor oocyte transfers, 1,946 (55%) underwent eSET. Live births after non-eSETs were less likely singletons (31.3% vs. 97.3%; aRR, 0.48) and more likely complicated by preterm delivery (61.1% vs. 25.7%; aRR, 2.09) and low birth weight (44.3% vs. 11.7%; aRR, 3.39) compared with those after eSET. Conclusion(s): Nonadherence with transfer guidelines was associated with dramatically increased multiple pregnancies, preterm births, and low birth weights.
KW - Embryo transfer
KW - blastocyst
KW - elective single embryo transfer
KW - guidelines
KW - multiple pregnancy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122987556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122987556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.015
DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 35058041
AN - SCOPUS:85122987556
SN - 0015-0282
VL - 117
SP - 548
EP - 559
JO - Fertility and Sterility
JF - Fertility and Sterility
IS - 3
ER -