Accuracy of self-reported weight in Hispanic/Latino adults of the hispanic community health study/study of latinos

Lindsay Fernández-Rhodes, Whitney R. Robinson, Daniela Sotres-Alvarez, Nora Franceschini, Sheila F. Castañeda, Christina Buelna, Ashley Moncrieft, Maria Llabre, Martha L. Daviglus, Qibin Qi, Anita Agarwal, Carmen R. Isasi, Paul Smokowski, Kari E. North, Penny Gordon-Larsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Previous US population-based studies have found that body weight may be underestimated when self-reported. However, this research may not apply to all US Hispanics/Latinos, many of whom are immigrants with distinct cultural orientations to ideal body size. We assessed the data quality and accuracy of self-reported weight in a diverse, community-based, US sample of primarily foreign-born Hispanic/Latino adults. Methods: Using baseline data (2008-2011) from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), we described the difference between contemporaneous self-reported and measured current body weight (n = 16,119) and used multivariate adjusted models to establish whether the observed trends in misreporting in potential predictors of inaccuracy persisted after adjustment for other predictors. Last, we described the weighted percentage agreement in body mass classification using either self-reported or measured weight (n = 16,110). Results: Self-reported weight was well correlated with (r2 = 0.95) and on average 0.23 kg greater than measured weight. The range of this misreporting was large and several factors were associated with misreporting: age group, gender, body mass categories, nativity, study site by background, unit of self-report (kg or lb), and end-digit preference. The percentage agreement of body mass classification using self-reported versus measured weight was 86% and varied across prevalent health conditions. Conclusions: The direction of misreporting in self-reported weight, and thus the anticipated bias in obesity prevalence estimates based on self-reported weights, may differ in US Hispanic/Latinos from that found in prior studies. Future investigations using self-reported body weight in US Hispanic/Latinos should consider this information for bias analyses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)847-853
Number of pages7
JournalEpidemiology
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Hispanic Americans
Weights and Measures
Health
Body Weight
Body Size
Self Report
Age Groups
Obesity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Fernández-Rhodes, L., Robinson, W. R., Sotres-Alvarez, D., Franceschini, N., Castañeda, S. F., Buelna, C., ... Gordon-Larsen, P. (2017). Accuracy of self-reported weight in Hispanic/Latino adults of the hispanic community health study/study of latinos. Epidemiology, 28(6), 847-853. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000728

Accuracy of self-reported weight in Hispanic/Latino adults of the hispanic community health study/study of latinos. / Fernández-Rhodes, Lindsay; Robinson, Whitney R.; Sotres-Alvarez, Daniela; Franceschini, Nora; Castañeda, Sheila F.; Buelna, Christina; Moncrieft, Ashley; Llabre, Maria; Daviglus, Martha L.; Qi, Qibin; Agarwal, Anita; Isasi, Carmen R.; Smokowski, Paul; North, Kari E.; Gordon-Larsen, Penny.

In: Epidemiology, Vol. 28, No. 6, 01.01.2017, p. 847-853.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fernández-Rhodes, L, Robinson, WR, Sotres-Alvarez, D, Franceschini, N, Castañeda, SF, Buelna, C, Moncrieft, A, Llabre, M, Daviglus, ML, Qi, Q, Agarwal, A, Isasi, CR, Smokowski, P, North, KE & Gordon-Larsen, P 2017, 'Accuracy of self-reported weight in Hispanic/Latino adults of the hispanic community health study/study of latinos', Epidemiology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 847-853. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000728
Fernández-Rhodes L, Robinson WR, Sotres-Alvarez D, Franceschini N, Castañeda SF, Buelna C et al. Accuracy of self-reported weight in Hispanic/Latino adults of the hispanic community health study/study of latinos. Epidemiology. 2017 Jan 1;28(6):847-853. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000728
Fernández-Rhodes, Lindsay ; Robinson, Whitney R. ; Sotres-Alvarez, Daniela ; Franceschini, Nora ; Castañeda, Sheila F. ; Buelna, Christina ; Moncrieft, Ashley ; Llabre, Maria ; Daviglus, Martha L. ; Qi, Qibin ; Agarwal, Anita ; Isasi, Carmen R. ; Smokowski, Paul ; North, Kari E. ; Gordon-Larsen, Penny. / Accuracy of self-reported weight in Hispanic/Latino adults of the hispanic community health study/study of latinos. In: Epidemiology. 2017 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 847-853.
@article{5219ad076e084c469fb960e416d8116f,
title = "Accuracy of self-reported weight in Hispanic/Latino adults of the hispanic community health study/study of latinos",
abstract = "Background: Previous US population-based studies have found that body weight may be underestimated when self-reported. However, this research may not apply to all US Hispanics/Latinos, many of whom are immigrants with distinct cultural orientations to ideal body size. We assessed the data quality and accuracy of self-reported weight in a diverse, community-based, US sample of primarily foreign-born Hispanic/Latino adults. Methods: Using baseline data (2008-2011) from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), we described the difference between contemporaneous self-reported and measured current body weight (n = 16,119) and used multivariate adjusted models to establish whether the observed trends in misreporting in potential predictors of inaccuracy persisted after adjustment for other predictors. Last, we described the weighted percentage agreement in body mass classification using either self-reported or measured weight (n = 16,110). Results: Self-reported weight was well correlated with (r2 = 0.95) and on average 0.23 kg greater than measured weight. The range of this misreporting was large and several factors were associated with misreporting: age group, gender, body mass categories, nativity, study site by background, unit of self-report (kg or lb), and end-digit preference. The percentage agreement of body mass classification using self-reported versus measured weight was 86{\%} and varied across prevalent health conditions. Conclusions: The direction of misreporting in self-reported weight, and thus the anticipated bias in obesity prevalence estimates based on self-reported weights, may differ in US Hispanic/Latinos from that found in prior studies. Future investigations using self-reported body weight in US Hispanic/Latinos should consider this information for bias analyses.",
author = "Lindsay Fern{\'a}ndez-Rhodes and Robinson, {Whitney R.} and Daniela Sotres-Alvarez and Nora Franceschini and Casta{\~n}eda, {Sheila F.} and Christina Buelna and Ashley Moncrieft and Maria Llabre and Daviglus, {Martha L.} and Qibin Qi and Anita Agarwal and Isasi, {Carmen R.} and Paul Smokowski and North, {Kari E.} and Penny Gordon-Larsen",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/EDE.0000000000000728",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "847--853",
journal = "Epidemiology",
issn = "1044-3983",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of self-reported weight in Hispanic/Latino adults of the hispanic community health study/study of latinos

AU - Fernández-Rhodes, Lindsay

AU - Robinson, Whitney R.

AU - Sotres-Alvarez, Daniela

AU - Franceschini, Nora

AU - Castañeda, Sheila F.

AU - Buelna, Christina

AU - Moncrieft, Ashley

AU - Llabre, Maria

AU - Daviglus, Martha L.

AU - Qi, Qibin

AU - Agarwal, Anita

AU - Isasi, Carmen R.

AU - Smokowski, Paul

AU - North, Kari E.

AU - Gordon-Larsen, Penny

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: Previous US population-based studies have found that body weight may be underestimated when self-reported. However, this research may not apply to all US Hispanics/Latinos, many of whom are immigrants with distinct cultural orientations to ideal body size. We assessed the data quality and accuracy of self-reported weight in a diverse, community-based, US sample of primarily foreign-born Hispanic/Latino adults. Methods: Using baseline data (2008-2011) from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), we described the difference between contemporaneous self-reported and measured current body weight (n = 16,119) and used multivariate adjusted models to establish whether the observed trends in misreporting in potential predictors of inaccuracy persisted after adjustment for other predictors. Last, we described the weighted percentage agreement in body mass classification using either self-reported or measured weight (n = 16,110). Results: Self-reported weight was well correlated with (r2 = 0.95) and on average 0.23 kg greater than measured weight. The range of this misreporting was large and several factors were associated with misreporting: age group, gender, body mass categories, nativity, study site by background, unit of self-report (kg or lb), and end-digit preference. The percentage agreement of body mass classification using self-reported versus measured weight was 86% and varied across prevalent health conditions. Conclusions: The direction of misreporting in self-reported weight, and thus the anticipated bias in obesity prevalence estimates based on self-reported weights, may differ in US Hispanic/Latinos from that found in prior studies. Future investigations using self-reported body weight in US Hispanic/Latinos should consider this information for bias analyses.

AB - Background: Previous US population-based studies have found that body weight may be underestimated when self-reported. However, this research may not apply to all US Hispanics/Latinos, many of whom are immigrants with distinct cultural orientations to ideal body size. We assessed the data quality and accuracy of self-reported weight in a diverse, community-based, US sample of primarily foreign-born Hispanic/Latino adults. Methods: Using baseline data (2008-2011) from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), we described the difference between contemporaneous self-reported and measured current body weight (n = 16,119) and used multivariate adjusted models to establish whether the observed trends in misreporting in potential predictors of inaccuracy persisted after adjustment for other predictors. Last, we described the weighted percentage agreement in body mass classification using either self-reported or measured weight (n = 16,110). Results: Self-reported weight was well correlated with (r2 = 0.95) and on average 0.23 kg greater than measured weight. The range of this misreporting was large and several factors were associated with misreporting: age group, gender, body mass categories, nativity, study site by background, unit of self-report (kg or lb), and end-digit preference. The percentage agreement of body mass classification using self-reported versus measured weight was 86% and varied across prevalent health conditions. Conclusions: The direction of misreporting in self-reported weight, and thus the anticipated bias in obesity prevalence estimates based on self-reported weights, may differ in US Hispanic/Latinos from that found in prior studies. Future investigations using self-reported body weight in US Hispanic/Latinos should consider this information for bias analyses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045642437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045642437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000728

DO - 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000728

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 847

EP - 853

JO - Epidemiology

JF - Epidemiology

SN - 1044-3983

IS - 6

ER -