A service delivery program and its evaluation: A Case Study in the Sociology of Applied Research

Dorothy Jones Jessop, Ruth E. K. Stein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Descriptions are rare of instances in which true experimental designs have been implemented in evaluating ongoing programs. This article is a case study of a health service delivery program and the classical pretest-posttest randomized experiment that evaluated it. The main theses are (1) that the research developed was based on the values and interests of the persons and institutions involved, and concordance in interests and values among the severalparties was responsible for success in implementing the rigorous experimental design; and (2) that the program being evaluated and the research evaluation affect each other in significant ways, some intended and others unanticipated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-114
Number of pages16
JournalEvaluation and the Health Professions
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983

Fingerprint

Sociology
Program Evaluation
sociology
Research Design
evaluation
Research
Health Services
evaluation research
Values
health service
human being
experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

A service delivery program and its evaluation : A Case Study in the Sociology of Applied Research. / Jessop, Dorothy Jones; Stein, Ruth E. K.

In: Evaluation and the Health Professions, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1983, p. 99-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5e85ed558702415a9e58435a73788f06,
title = "A service delivery program and its evaluation: A Case Study in the Sociology of Applied Research",
abstract = "Descriptions are rare of instances in which true experimental designs have been implemented in evaluating ongoing programs. This article is a case study of a health service delivery program and the classical pretest-posttest randomized experiment that evaluated it. The main theses are (1) that the research developed was based on the values and interests of the persons and institutions involved, and concordance in interests and values among the severalparties was responsible for success in implementing the rigorous experimental design; and (2) that the program being evaluated and the research evaluation affect each other in significant ways, some intended and others unanticipated.",
author = "Jessop, {Dorothy Jones} and Stein, {Ruth E. K.}",
year = "1983",
doi = "10.1177/016327878300600107",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "99--114",
journal = "Evaluation and the Health Professions",
issn = "0163-2787",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A service delivery program and its evaluation

T2 - A Case Study in the Sociology of Applied Research

AU - Jessop, Dorothy Jones

AU - Stein, Ruth E. K.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - Descriptions are rare of instances in which true experimental designs have been implemented in evaluating ongoing programs. This article is a case study of a health service delivery program and the classical pretest-posttest randomized experiment that evaluated it. The main theses are (1) that the research developed was based on the values and interests of the persons and institutions involved, and concordance in interests and values among the severalparties was responsible for success in implementing the rigorous experimental design; and (2) that the program being evaluated and the research evaluation affect each other in significant ways, some intended and others unanticipated.

AB - Descriptions are rare of instances in which true experimental designs have been implemented in evaluating ongoing programs. This article is a case study of a health service delivery program and the classical pretest-posttest randomized experiment that evaluated it. The main theses are (1) that the research developed was based on the values and interests of the persons and institutions involved, and concordance in interests and values among the severalparties was responsible for success in implementing the rigorous experimental design; and (2) that the program being evaluated and the research evaluation affect each other in significant ways, some intended and others unanticipated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020727180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020727180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/016327878300600107

DO - 10.1177/016327878300600107

M3 - Article

C2 - 10259955

AN - SCOPUS:0020727180

VL - 6

SP - 99

EP - 114

JO - Evaluation and the Health Professions

JF - Evaluation and the Health Professions

SN - 0163-2787

IS - 1

ER -