A Root-Cause Analysis of Mortality Following Major Pancreatectomy

Charles Mahlon Vollmer, Norberto Sanchez, Stephen Gondek, John C. McAuliffe, Tara S. Kent, John D. Christein, Mark P. Callery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

109 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Although mortality rates from pancreatectomy have decreased worldwide, death remains an infrequent but profound event at an individual practice level. Root-cause analysis is a retrospective method commonly employed to understand adverse events. We evaluate whether emerging mortality risk assessment tools sufficiently predict and account for actual clinical events that are often identified by root-cause analysis. Methods: We assembled a Pancreatic Surgery Mortality Study Group comprised of 36 pancreatic surgeons from 15 institutions in 4 countries. Mortalities after pancreatectomy (30 and 90 days) were accrued from 2000 to 2010. For root-cause analysis, each surgeon "deconstructed" the clinical events preceding a death to determine cause. We next tested whether mortality risk assessment tools (ASA, POSSUM, Charlson, SOAR, and NSQIP) could predict those patients who would die (n = 218) and compared their prognostic accuracy against a cohort of resections in which no patient died (n = 1,177). Results: Two hundred eighteen deaths (184 Whipple's resection, 18 distal pancreatectomies, and 16 total pancreatectomies) were identified from 11,559 pancreatectomies performed by surgeons whose experience averaged 14. 5 years. Overall 30- and 90-day mortalities were 0. 96% and 1. 89%, respectively. Individual surgeon rates ranged from 0% to 4. 7%. Only 5 patients died intraoperatively, while the other 213 succumbed at a median of 29 days. Mean patient age was 70 years old (38% were >75 years old). Malignancy was the indication in 90% of cases, mostly pancreatic cancer (57%). Median operative time was 365 min and estimated blood loss was 700 cc (range, 100-16,000 cc). Vascular repair or multivisceral resections were required for 19. 7% and 15. 1%, respectively. Seventy-seven percent had a variety of major complications before death. Eighty-seven percent required intensive care unit care, 55% were transfused, and 35% were reoperated upon. Fifty percent died during the index admission, while another 11% died after a readmission. Almost half (n = 107) expired between 31 and 90 days. Only 11% had autopsies. Operation-related complications contributed to 40% of deaths, with pancreatic fistula being the most evident (14%). Technical errors (21%) and poor patient selection (15%) were cited by surgeons. Of deaths, 5. 5% had associated cancer progression-all occurring between 31 and 90 days. Even after root-cause scrutiny, the ultimate cause of death could not be determined for a quarter of the patients-most often between 31 and 90 days. While assorted risk models predicted mortality with variable discrimination from nonmortalities, they consistently underestimated the actual mortality events we report. Conclusion: Root-cause analysis suggests that risk prediction should include, if not emphasize, operative factors related to pancreatectomy. While risk models can distinguish between mortalities and nonmortalities in a collective fashion, they vastly miscalculate the actual chance of death on an individual basis. This study reveals the contributions of both comorbidities and aggressive surgical decisions to mortality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-103
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Root Cause Analysis
Pancreatectomy
Mortality
Pancreatic Fistula
Operative Time
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Patient Selection
Blood Vessels
Intensive Care Units
Comorbidity
Cause of Death
Autopsy
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Death
  • Mortality
  • Outcomes
  • Pancreatectomy
  • Risk prediction
  • Root-cause analysis
  • Whipple's resection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Vollmer, C. M., Sanchez, N., Gondek, S., McAuliffe, J. C., Kent, T. S., Christein, J. D., & Callery, M. P. (2012). A Root-Cause Analysis of Mortality Following Major Pancreatectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 16(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1753-x

A Root-Cause Analysis of Mortality Following Major Pancreatectomy. / Vollmer, Charles Mahlon; Sanchez, Norberto; Gondek, Stephen; McAuliffe, John C.; Kent, Tara S.; Christein, John D.; Callery, Mark P.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 89-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vollmer, CM, Sanchez, N, Gondek, S, McAuliffe, JC, Kent, TS, Christein, JD & Callery, MP 2012, 'A Root-Cause Analysis of Mortality Following Major Pancreatectomy', Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1753-x
Vollmer, Charles Mahlon ; Sanchez, Norberto ; Gondek, Stephen ; McAuliffe, John C. ; Kent, Tara S. ; Christein, John D. ; Callery, Mark P. / A Root-Cause Analysis of Mortality Following Major Pancreatectomy. In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 89-103.
@article{476fd580fa294360a07a4d8c4ba9a84d,
title = "A Root-Cause Analysis of Mortality Following Major Pancreatectomy",
abstract = "Introduction: Although mortality rates from pancreatectomy have decreased worldwide, death remains an infrequent but profound event at an individual practice level. Root-cause analysis is a retrospective method commonly employed to understand adverse events. We evaluate whether emerging mortality risk assessment tools sufficiently predict and account for actual clinical events that are often identified by root-cause analysis. Methods: We assembled a Pancreatic Surgery Mortality Study Group comprised of 36 pancreatic surgeons from 15 institutions in 4 countries. Mortalities after pancreatectomy (30 and 90 days) were accrued from 2000 to 2010. For root-cause analysis, each surgeon {"}deconstructed{"} the clinical events preceding a death to determine cause. We next tested whether mortality risk assessment tools (ASA, POSSUM, Charlson, SOAR, and NSQIP) could predict those patients who would die (n = 218) and compared their prognostic accuracy against a cohort of resections in which no patient died (n = 1,177). Results: Two hundred eighteen deaths (184 Whipple's resection, 18 distal pancreatectomies, and 16 total pancreatectomies) were identified from 11,559 pancreatectomies performed by surgeons whose experience averaged 14. 5 years. Overall 30- and 90-day mortalities were 0. 96{\%} and 1. 89{\%}, respectively. Individual surgeon rates ranged from 0{\%} to 4. 7{\%}. Only 5 patients died intraoperatively, while the other 213 succumbed at a median of 29 days. Mean patient age was 70 years old (38{\%} were >75 years old). Malignancy was the indication in 90{\%} of cases, mostly pancreatic cancer (57{\%}). Median operative time was 365 min and estimated blood loss was 700 cc (range, 100-16,000 cc). Vascular repair or multivisceral resections were required for 19. 7{\%} and 15. 1{\%}, respectively. Seventy-seven percent had a variety of major complications before death. Eighty-seven percent required intensive care unit care, 55{\%} were transfused, and 35{\%} were reoperated upon. Fifty percent died during the index admission, while another 11{\%} died after a readmission. Almost half (n = 107) expired between 31 and 90 days. Only 11{\%} had autopsies. Operation-related complications contributed to 40{\%} of deaths, with pancreatic fistula being the most evident (14{\%}). Technical errors (21{\%}) and poor patient selection (15{\%}) were cited by surgeons. Of deaths, 5. 5{\%} had associated cancer progression-all occurring between 31 and 90 days. Even after root-cause scrutiny, the ultimate cause of death could not be determined for a quarter of the patients-most often between 31 and 90 days. While assorted risk models predicted mortality with variable discrimination from nonmortalities, they consistently underestimated the actual mortality events we report. Conclusion: Root-cause analysis suggests that risk prediction should include, if not emphasize, operative factors related to pancreatectomy. While risk models can distinguish between mortalities and nonmortalities in a collective fashion, they vastly miscalculate the actual chance of death on an individual basis. This study reveals the contributions of both comorbidities and aggressive surgical decisions to mortality.",
keywords = "Death, Mortality, Outcomes, Pancreatectomy, Risk prediction, Root-cause analysis, Whipple's resection",
author = "Vollmer, {Charles Mahlon} and Norberto Sanchez and Stephen Gondek and McAuliffe, {John C.} and Kent, {Tara S.} and Christein, {John D.} and Callery, {Mark P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-011-1753-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "89--103",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Root-Cause Analysis of Mortality Following Major Pancreatectomy

AU - Vollmer, Charles Mahlon

AU - Sanchez, Norberto

AU - Gondek, Stephen

AU - McAuliffe, John C.

AU - Kent, Tara S.

AU - Christein, John D.

AU - Callery, Mark P.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Introduction: Although mortality rates from pancreatectomy have decreased worldwide, death remains an infrequent but profound event at an individual practice level. Root-cause analysis is a retrospective method commonly employed to understand adverse events. We evaluate whether emerging mortality risk assessment tools sufficiently predict and account for actual clinical events that are often identified by root-cause analysis. Methods: We assembled a Pancreatic Surgery Mortality Study Group comprised of 36 pancreatic surgeons from 15 institutions in 4 countries. Mortalities after pancreatectomy (30 and 90 days) were accrued from 2000 to 2010. For root-cause analysis, each surgeon "deconstructed" the clinical events preceding a death to determine cause. We next tested whether mortality risk assessment tools (ASA, POSSUM, Charlson, SOAR, and NSQIP) could predict those patients who would die (n = 218) and compared their prognostic accuracy against a cohort of resections in which no patient died (n = 1,177). Results: Two hundred eighteen deaths (184 Whipple's resection, 18 distal pancreatectomies, and 16 total pancreatectomies) were identified from 11,559 pancreatectomies performed by surgeons whose experience averaged 14. 5 years. Overall 30- and 90-day mortalities were 0. 96% and 1. 89%, respectively. Individual surgeon rates ranged from 0% to 4. 7%. Only 5 patients died intraoperatively, while the other 213 succumbed at a median of 29 days. Mean patient age was 70 years old (38% were >75 years old). Malignancy was the indication in 90% of cases, mostly pancreatic cancer (57%). Median operative time was 365 min and estimated blood loss was 700 cc (range, 100-16,000 cc). Vascular repair or multivisceral resections were required for 19. 7% and 15. 1%, respectively. Seventy-seven percent had a variety of major complications before death. Eighty-seven percent required intensive care unit care, 55% were transfused, and 35% were reoperated upon. Fifty percent died during the index admission, while another 11% died after a readmission. Almost half (n = 107) expired between 31 and 90 days. Only 11% had autopsies. Operation-related complications contributed to 40% of deaths, with pancreatic fistula being the most evident (14%). Technical errors (21%) and poor patient selection (15%) were cited by surgeons. Of deaths, 5. 5% had associated cancer progression-all occurring between 31 and 90 days. Even after root-cause scrutiny, the ultimate cause of death could not be determined for a quarter of the patients-most often between 31 and 90 days. While assorted risk models predicted mortality with variable discrimination from nonmortalities, they consistently underestimated the actual mortality events we report. Conclusion: Root-cause analysis suggests that risk prediction should include, if not emphasize, operative factors related to pancreatectomy. While risk models can distinguish between mortalities and nonmortalities in a collective fashion, they vastly miscalculate the actual chance of death on an individual basis. This study reveals the contributions of both comorbidities and aggressive surgical decisions to mortality.

AB - Introduction: Although mortality rates from pancreatectomy have decreased worldwide, death remains an infrequent but profound event at an individual practice level. Root-cause analysis is a retrospective method commonly employed to understand adverse events. We evaluate whether emerging mortality risk assessment tools sufficiently predict and account for actual clinical events that are often identified by root-cause analysis. Methods: We assembled a Pancreatic Surgery Mortality Study Group comprised of 36 pancreatic surgeons from 15 institutions in 4 countries. Mortalities after pancreatectomy (30 and 90 days) were accrued from 2000 to 2010. For root-cause analysis, each surgeon "deconstructed" the clinical events preceding a death to determine cause. We next tested whether mortality risk assessment tools (ASA, POSSUM, Charlson, SOAR, and NSQIP) could predict those patients who would die (n = 218) and compared their prognostic accuracy against a cohort of resections in which no patient died (n = 1,177). Results: Two hundred eighteen deaths (184 Whipple's resection, 18 distal pancreatectomies, and 16 total pancreatectomies) were identified from 11,559 pancreatectomies performed by surgeons whose experience averaged 14. 5 years. Overall 30- and 90-day mortalities were 0. 96% and 1. 89%, respectively. Individual surgeon rates ranged from 0% to 4. 7%. Only 5 patients died intraoperatively, while the other 213 succumbed at a median of 29 days. Mean patient age was 70 years old (38% were >75 years old). Malignancy was the indication in 90% of cases, mostly pancreatic cancer (57%). Median operative time was 365 min and estimated blood loss was 700 cc (range, 100-16,000 cc). Vascular repair or multivisceral resections were required for 19. 7% and 15. 1%, respectively. Seventy-seven percent had a variety of major complications before death. Eighty-seven percent required intensive care unit care, 55% were transfused, and 35% were reoperated upon. Fifty percent died during the index admission, while another 11% died after a readmission. Almost half (n = 107) expired between 31 and 90 days. Only 11% had autopsies. Operation-related complications contributed to 40% of deaths, with pancreatic fistula being the most evident (14%). Technical errors (21%) and poor patient selection (15%) were cited by surgeons. Of deaths, 5. 5% had associated cancer progression-all occurring between 31 and 90 days. Even after root-cause scrutiny, the ultimate cause of death could not be determined for a quarter of the patients-most often between 31 and 90 days. While assorted risk models predicted mortality with variable discrimination from nonmortalities, they consistently underestimated the actual mortality events we report. Conclusion: Root-cause analysis suggests that risk prediction should include, if not emphasize, operative factors related to pancreatectomy. While risk models can distinguish between mortalities and nonmortalities in a collective fashion, they vastly miscalculate the actual chance of death on an individual basis. This study reveals the contributions of both comorbidities and aggressive surgical decisions to mortality.

KW - Death

KW - Mortality

KW - Outcomes

KW - Pancreatectomy

KW - Risk prediction

KW - Root-cause analysis

KW - Whipple's resection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855354937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855354937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-011-1753-x

DO - 10.1007/s11605-011-1753-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22065319

AN - SCOPUS:84855354937

VL - 16

SP - 89

EP - 103

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 1

ER -