A review of reconstructive materials for use in craniofacial surgery bone fixation materials, bone substitutes, and distractors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the last 40 years, craniofacial surgery, in general, and surgery for craniosynostosis, in particular, has witnessed the introduction of a number of new materials for use in operations involving the cranial vault. Some of these materials have proven quite useful over time, while others have failed to meet their stated objectives. In this review, the more popular implant materials are analyzed, and their relative merits and drawbacks are discussed. Craniofacial surgery in the pediatric population has its own unique limitations, quite different from the adult population and those issues are reviewed as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1577-1588
Number of pages12
JournalChild's Nervous System
Volume28
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Bone Substitutes
Bone and Bones
Craniosynostoses
Population
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Allograft cranioplasty
  • Autologous/autogenous cranioplasty
  • Bioabsorbable fixation
  • Biomaterial
  • Bone cement
  • Calvarial bone grafts
  • Craniosynostosis
  • Custom-made implants
  • Hydroxyapatite
  • Methyl methacrylate
  • Pediatric neurosurgery
  • Resorbable plates and screws
  • Skull defect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{9c4ce51ce15348babd233010ec01c250,
title = "A review of reconstructive materials for use in craniofacial surgery bone fixation materials, bone substitutes, and distractors",
abstract = "Over the last 40 years, craniofacial surgery, in general, and surgery for craniosynostosis, in particular, has witnessed the introduction of a number of new materials for use in operations involving the cranial vault. Some of these materials have proven quite useful over time, while others have failed to meet their stated objectives. In this review, the more popular implant materials are analyzed, and their relative merits and drawbacks are discussed. Craniofacial surgery in the pediatric population has its own unique limitations, quite different from the adult population and those issues are reviewed as well.",
keywords = "Allograft cranioplasty, Autologous/autogenous cranioplasty, Bioabsorbable fixation, Biomaterial, Bone cement, Calvarial bone grafts, Craniosynostosis, Custom-made implants, Hydroxyapatite, Methyl methacrylate, Pediatric neurosurgery, Resorbable plates and screws, Skull defect",
author = "Goodrich, {James Tait} and Sandler, {Adam L.} and Tepper, {Oren M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00381-012-1776-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1577--1588",
journal = "Child's Nervous System",
issn = "0256-7040",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of reconstructive materials for use in craniofacial surgery bone fixation materials, bone substitutes, and distractors

AU - Goodrich, James Tait

AU - Sandler, Adam L.

AU - Tepper, Oren M.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Over the last 40 years, craniofacial surgery, in general, and surgery for craniosynostosis, in particular, has witnessed the introduction of a number of new materials for use in operations involving the cranial vault. Some of these materials have proven quite useful over time, while others have failed to meet their stated objectives. In this review, the more popular implant materials are analyzed, and their relative merits and drawbacks are discussed. Craniofacial surgery in the pediatric population has its own unique limitations, quite different from the adult population and those issues are reviewed as well.

AB - Over the last 40 years, craniofacial surgery, in general, and surgery for craniosynostosis, in particular, has witnessed the introduction of a number of new materials for use in operations involving the cranial vault. Some of these materials have proven quite useful over time, while others have failed to meet their stated objectives. In this review, the more popular implant materials are analyzed, and their relative merits and drawbacks are discussed. Craniofacial surgery in the pediatric population has its own unique limitations, quite different from the adult population and those issues are reviewed as well.

KW - Allograft cranioplasty

KW - Autologous/autogenous cranioplasty

KW - Bioabsorbable fixation

KW - Biomaterial

KW - Bone cement

KW - Calvarial bone grafts

KW - Craniosynostosis

KW - Custom-made implants

KW - Hydroxyapatite

KW - Methyl methacrylate

KW - Pediatric neurosurgery

KW - Resorbable plates and screws

KW - Skull defect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866075575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866075575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00381-012-1776-y

DO - 10.1007/s00381-012-1776-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 22872276

AN - SCOPUS:84866075575

VL - 28

SP - 1577

EP - 1588

JO - Child's Nervous System

JF - Child's Nervous System

SN - 0256-7040

IS - 9

ER -