TY - JOUR
T1 - A Review of Primary Care Training Programs in Correctional Health for Physicians
AU - Min, In Sung
AU - Schonberg, Dana
AU - Anderson, Matthew
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful for support from the Department of Family and Social Medicine at Montefiore Medical Center. Thanks also to Warren J. Ferguson, M.D.; Shira Shavit, M.D.; Homer Venters, M.D., M.S.; Jennifer M. Purcell, Ph.D.; and Sean C. Lucan, M.D., M.P.H., M.S., for advice that contributed to this article. We also thank the anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments.
PY - 2012/1
Y1 - 2012/1
N2 - Background: Despite the health consequences of incarceration, there are no national standards for teaching physicians about correctional health. The purpose of this study was to survey existing correctional health training programs for primary care physicians. Summary: Programs were identified through literature and Web search, snowballing, and professional meetings. Programs were contacted and asked to complete a survey. Correctional health programs exist in a variety of disciplines. We identified 22 in primary care. Programs seek to improve public health, reduce stigma, and recruit physicians to correctional health. Curricula covered specific health problems as well as the impact of incarceration on families and communities. Relationships between the academic center and the correctional facilities were varied. Barriers include issues of security, time, financial resources, and stigma. Programs evaluate their learners, as well as educational and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: A variety of correctional health programs currently exist. A national model curriculum could strengthen teaching in correctional health.
AB - Background: Despite the health consequences of incarceration, there are no national standards for teaching physicians about correctional health. The purpose of this study was to survey existing correctional health training programs for primary care physicians. Summary: Programs were identified through literature and Web search, snowballing, and professional meetings. Programs were contacted and asked to complete a survey. Correctional health programs exist in a variety of disciplines. We identified 22 in primary care. Programs seek to improve public health, reduce stigma, and recruit physicians to correctional health. Curricula covered specific health problems as well as the impact of incarceration on families and communities. Relationships between the academic center and the correctional facilities were varied. Barriers include issues of security, time, financial resources, and stigma. Programs evaluate their learners, as well as educational and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: A variety of correctional health programs currently exist. A national model curriculum could strengthen teaching in correctional health.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860815498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860815498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10401334.2012.641492
DO - 10.1080/10401334.2012.641492
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22250940
AN - SCOPUS:84860815498
SN - 1040-1334
VL - 24
SP - 81
EP - 89
JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
IS - 1
ER -