A review of 130 humans enrolled in transgastric NOTES protocols at a single institution

Peter Nau, E. Christopher Ellison, Peter Muscarella, Dean Mikami, Vimal K. Narula, Bradley Needleman, W. Scott Melvin, Jeffrey W. Hazey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The methodology of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) has been validated in both human and animal models. Herein is a discussion of our experience gained from the initial 130 patients enrolled in transgastric pre-NOTES and NOTES protocols at our institution. Methods: A retrospective review of our research database was performed for all patients enrolled in NOTES protocols. The infectious risk of a gastrotomy with and without a NOTES procedure was assessed in 100 patients. Eighty patients completed a true NOTES protocol looking at staging, access, and insufflation with select patients evaluating the potential for bacterial contamination of the abdominal compartment. Results: A total of 130 patients have completed pre-NOTES and NOTES protocols at our institution. We observed no clinically significant contamination of the abdomen secondary to transgastric procedures in 100 patients. Diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy (DTEP) was completed in 20 patients with pancreatic head masses and found to have a 95% concordance with laparoscopic exploration for assessment of peritoneal metastases. Blind endoscopic gastrotomy and DTEP were evaluated in 40 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures (LSRYGB) and were found to be safe, reliable, and without a clinically significant risk of contamination. Endoscopic peritoneal insufflation was successfully established and correlated with standard laparoscopic insufflation in 20 patients. Conclusions: Transgastric NOTES is a safe alternative approach to accessing the peritoneal cavity in humans. The risk of bacterial contamination secondary to peroral and transgastric access is clinically insignificant. A device for the facile closure of the gastric defect is the sole factor limiting institution of this methodology as a standalone technique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1004-1011
Number of pages8
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
Insufflation
Laparoscopy
Gastric Bypass
Peritoneal Cavity
Abdomen
Stomach
Animal Models

Keywords

  • Endolumenal surgery
  • Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery
  • Transgastric surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A review of 130 humans enrolled in transgastric NOTES protocols at a single institution. / Nau, Peter; Ellison, E. Christopher; Muscarella, Peter; Mikami, Dean; Narula, Vimal K.; Needleman, Bradley; Melvin, W. Scott; Hazey, Jeffrey W.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 25, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 1004-1011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nau, Peter ; Ellison, E. Christopher ; Muscarella, Peter ; Mikami, Dean ; Narula, Vimal K. ; Needleman, Bradley ; Melvin, W. Scott ; Hazey, Jeffrey W. / A review of 130 humans enrolled in transgastric NOTES protocols at a single institution. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 1004-1011.
@article{af1186e98d37489e8069598f79da7469,
title = "A review of 130 humans enrolled in transgastric NOTES protocols at a single institution",
abstract = "Background: The methodology of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) has been validated in both human and animal models. Herein is a discussion of our experience gained from the initial 130 patients enrolled in transgastric pre-NOTES and NOTES protocols at our institution. Methods: A retrospective review of our research database was performed for all patients enrolled in NOTES protocols. The infectious risk of a gastrotomy with and without a NOTES procedure was assessed in 100 patients. Eighty patients completed a true NOTES protocol looking at staging, access, and insufflation with select patients evaluating the potential for bacterial contamination of the abdominal compartment. Results: A total of 130 patients have completed pre-NOTES and NOTES protocols at our institution. We observed no clinically significant contamination of the abdomen secondary to transgastric procedures in 100 patients. Diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy (DTEP) was completed in 20 patients with pancreatic head masses and found to have a 95{\%} concordance with laparoscopic exploration for assessment of peritoneal metastases. Blind endoscopic gastrotomy and DTEP were evaluated in 40 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures (LSRYGB) and were found to be safe, reliable, and without a clinically significant risk of contamination. Endoscopic peritoneal insufflation was successfully established and correlated with standard laparoscopic insufflation in 20 patients. Conclusions: Transgastric NOTES is a safe alternative approach to accessing the peritoneal cavity in humans. The risk of bacterial contamination secondary to peroral and transgastric access is clinically insignificant. A device for the facile closure of the gastric defect is the sole factor limiting institution of this methodology as a standalone technique.",
keywords = "Endolumenal surgery, Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery, Transgastric surgery",
author = "Peter Nau and Ellison, {E. Christopher} and Peter Muscarella and Dean Mikami and Narula, {Vimal K.} and Bradley Needleman and Melvin, {W. Scott} and Hazey, {Jeffrey W.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-010-1369-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1004--1011",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of 130 humans enrolled in transgastric NOTES protocols at a single institution

AU - Nau, Peter

AU - Ellison, E. Christopher

AU - Muscarella, Peter

AU - Mikami, Dean

AU - Narula, Vimal K.

AU - Needleman, Bradley

AU - Melvin, W. Scott

AU - Hazey, Jeffrey W.

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Background: The methodology of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) has been validated in both human and animal models. Herein is a discussion of our experience gained from the initial 130 patients enrolled in transgastric pre-NOTES and NOTES protocols at our institution. Methods: A retrospective review of our research database was performed for all patients enrolled in NOTES protocols. The infectious risk of a gastrotomy with and without a NOTES procedure was assessed in 100 patients. Eighty patients completed a true NOTES protocol looking at staging, access, and insufflation with select patients evaluating the potential for bacterial contamination of the abdominal compartment. Results: A total of 130 patients have completed pre-NOTES and NOTES protocols at our institution. We observed no clinically significant contamination of the abdomen secondary to transgastric procedures in 100 patients. Diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy (DTEP) was completed in 20 patients with pancreatic head masses and found to have a 95% concordance with laparoscopic exploration for assessment of peritoneal metastases. Blind endoscopic gastrotomy and DTEP were evaluated in 40 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures (LSRYGB) and were found to be safe, reliable, and without a clinically significant risk of contamination. Endoscopic peritoneal insufflation was successfully established and correlated with standard laparoscopic insufflation in 20 patients. Conclusions: Transgastric NOTES is a safe alternative approach to accessing the peritoneal cavity in humans. The risk of bacterial contamination secondary to peroral and transgastric access is clinically insignificant. A device for the facile closure of the gastric defect is the sole factor limiting institution of this methodology as a standalone technique.

AB - Background: The methodology of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) has been validated in both human and animal models. Herein is a discussion of our experience gained from the initial 130 patients enrolled in transgastric pre-NOTES and NOTES protocols at our institution. Methods: A retrospective review of our research database was performed for all patients enrolled in NOTES protocols. The infectious risk of a gastrotomy with and without a NOTES procedure was assessed in 100 patients. Eighty patients completed a true NOTES protocol looking at staging, access, and insufflation with select patients evaluating the potential for bacterial contamination of the abdominal compartment. Results: A total of 130 patients have completed pre-NOTES and NOTES protocols at our institution. We observed no clinically significant contamination of the abdomen secondary to transgastric procedures in 100 patients. Diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy (DTEP) was completed in 20 patients with pancreatic head masses and found to have a 95% concordance with laparoscopic exploration for assessment of peritoneal metastases. Blind endoscopic gastrotomy and DTEP were evaluated in 40 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures (LSRYGB) and were found to be safe, reliable, and without a clinically significant risk of contamination. Endoscopic peritoneal insufflation was successfully established and correlated with standard laparoscopic insufflation in 20 patients. Conclusions: Transgastric NOTES is a safe alternative approach to accessing the peritoneal cavity in humans. The risk of bacterial contamination secondary to peroral and transgastric access is clinically insignificant. A device for the facile closure of the gastric defect is the sole factor limiting institution of this methodology as a standalone technique.

KW - Endolumenal surgery

KW - Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery

KW - Transgastric surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954443935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954443935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-010-1369-3

DO - 10.1007/s00464-010-1369-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 20976500

AN - SCOPUS:79954443935

VL - 25

SP - 1004

EP - 1011

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 4

ER -