TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized trial comparing surgeon-administered intraoperative transversus abdominis plane block with anesthesiologist-administered transcutaneous block
AU - Narasimhulu, D. M.
AU - Scharfman, L.
AU - Minkoff, H.
AU - George, B.
AU - Homel, P.
AU - Tyagaraj, K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by a grant awarded to DMN and KT, from Maimonides Research and Development foundation.
Funding Information:
We obtained Institutional Review Board approval and piloted the surgical TAP block on five patients before starting the study, as the surgical TAP had never been performed at our hospital previously. During the pilot phase, cold and light touch sensation were found to be diminished in the lower abdomen after the block (tested after the spinal anesthetic resolved), and there were no adverse outcomes. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02571439) and funded by a grant awarded to DN and KT, from the Maimonides Research and Development Foundation. The funding agency did not play any role in conducting the study, analyzing results or writing or reviewing this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - Background: Injection of local anesthetic into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP block) decreases systemic morphine requirements after abdominal surgery. We compared intraoperative surgeon-administered TAP block (surgical TAP) to anesthesiologist-administered transcutaneous ultrasound-guided TAP block (conventional TAP) for post-cesarean analgesia. We hypothesized that surgical TAP blocks would take less time to perform than conventional TAP blocks. Methods: We performed a randomized trial, recruiting 41 women undergoing cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia, assigning them to either surgical TAP block (n=20) or conventional TAP block (n=21). Time taken to perform the block was the primary outcome, while postoperative pain scores and 24-hour opioid requirements were secondary outcomes. Student's t-test was used to compare block time and Kruskal-Wallis test opioid consumption and pain-scores. Results: Time taken to perform the block (2.4 vs 12.1 min, P <0.001), and time spent in the operating room after delivery (55.3 vs 77.9 min, P <0.001) were significantly less for surgical TAP. The 24 h morphine consumption (P=0.17) and postoperative pain scores at 4, 8, 24 and 48 h were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion: Surgical TAP blocks are feasible and less time consuming than conventional TAP blocks, while providing comparable analgesia after cesarean delivery.
AB - Background: Injection of local anesthetic into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP block) decreases systemic morphine requirements after abdominal surgery. We compared intraoperative surgeon-administered TAP block (surgical TAP) to anesthesiologist-administered transcutaneous ultrasound-guided TAP block (conventional TAP) for post-cesarean analgesia. We hypothesized that surgical TAP blocks would take less time to perform than conventional TAP blocks. Methods: We performed a randomized trial, recruiting 41 women undergoing cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia, assigning them to either surgical TAP block (n=20) or conventional TAP block (n=21). Time taken to perform the block was the primary outcome, while postoperative pain scores and 24-hour opioid requirements were secondary outcomes. Student's t-test was used to compare block time and Kruskal-Wallis test opioid consumption and pain-scores. Results: Time taken to perform the block (2.4 vs 12.1 min, P <0.001), and time spent in the operating room after delivery (55.3 vs 77.9 min, P <0.001) were significantly less for surgical TAP. The 24 h morphine consumption (P=0.17) and postoperative pain scores at 4, 8, 24 and 48 h were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion: Surgical TAP blocks are feasible and less time consuming than conventional TAP blocks, while providing comparable analgesia after cesarean delivery.
KW - Analgesia
KW - Postoperative
KW - Transversus abdominis plane block
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048548771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048548771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.04.007
DO - 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.04.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85048548771
SN - 0959-289X
VL - 35
SP - 26
EP - 32
JO - International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
JF - International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
ER -