A new surrogate variable for erectile dysfunction status in the Massachusetts male aging study

Ken P. Kleinman, Henry A. Feldman, Catherine B. Johannes, Carol A. Derby, John B. McKinlay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the subject of a vast clinical literature, but little information has been gathered from random samples of the general public. The Massachusetts Male Aging Study (MMAS) addressed this important aspect of men's health. The MMAS was conducted in two waves, with baseline data collection in 1987-1989 and follow-up in 1995-1997. Subsequent to the baseline MMAS survey, a consensus developed that subjective measures are optimal for defining ED. Unfortunately, the baseline questionnaire did not ask subjects directly about their erectile functioning. Thus, we previously assigned the MMAS subjects a degree of impotence at baseline using a series of related questions, employing a discriminant formula constructed from a separate sample of urology clinic patients. At follow-up the men classified themselves directly in addition to answering the original series of related questions. In the present article, we report the results of a new discriminant function, based on the MMAS men at follow-up. We also compare the two methods and discuss our reasons for preferring the internally calibrated method. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)71-78
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Erectile Dysfunction
Men's Health
Urology
Consensus
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Discriminant analysis
  • Erectile dysfunction
  • Men
  • Population study
  • Prevalence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

A new surrogate variable for erectile dysfunction status in the Massachusetts male aging study. / Kleinman, Ken P.; Feldman, Henry A.; Johannes, Catherine B.; Derby, Carol A.; McKinlay, John B.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 53, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 71-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kleinman, Ken P. ; Feldman, Henry A. ; Johannes, Catherine B. ; Derby, Carol A. ; McKinlay, John B. / A new surrogate variable for erectile dysfunction status in the Massachusetts male aging study. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000 ; Vol. 53, No. 1. pp. 71-78.
@article{82677c51f36747cd81b4d7f5407952eb,
title = "A new surrogate variable for erectile dysfunction status in the Massachusetts male aging study",
abstract = "Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the subject of a vast clinical literature, but little information has been gathered from random samples of the general public. The Massachusetts Male Aging Study (MMAS) addressed this important aspect of men's health. The MMAS was conducted in two waves, with baseline data collection in 1987-1989 and follow-up in 1995-1997. Subsequent to the baseline MMAS survey, a consensus developed that subjective measures are optimal for defining ED. Unfortunately, the baseline questionnaire did not ask subjects directly about their erectile functioning. Thus, we previously assigned the MMAS subjects a degree of impotence at baseline using a series of related questions, employing a discriminant formula constructed from a separate sample of urology clinic patients. At follow-up the men classified themselves directly in addition to answering the original series of related questions. In the present article, we report the results of a new discriminant function, based on the MMAS men at follow-up. We also compare the two methods and discuss our reasons for preferring the internally calibrated method. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.",
keywords = "Aging, Discriminant analysis, Erectile dysfunction, Men, Population study, Prevalence",
author = "Kleinman, {Ken P.} and Feldman, {Henry A.} and Johannes, {Catherine B.} and Derby, {Carol A.} and McKinlay, {John B.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00150-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "71--78",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new surrogate variable for erectile dysfunction status in the Massachusetts male aging study

AU - Kleinman, Ken P.

AU - Feldman, Henry A.

AU - Johannes, Catherine B.

AU - Derby, Carol A.

AU - McKinlay, John B.

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the subject of a vast clinical literature, but little information has been gathered from random samples of the general public. The Massachusetts Male Aging Study (MMAS) addressed this important aspect of men's health. The MMAS was conducted in two waves, with baseline data collection in 1987-1989 and follow-up in 1995-1997. Subsequent to the baseline MMAS survey, a consensus developed that subjective measures are optimal for defining ED. Unfortunately, the baseline questionnaire did not ask subjects directly about their erectile functioning. Thus, we previously assigned the MMAS subjects a degree of impotence at baseline using a series of related questions, employing a discriminant formula constructed from a separate sample of urology clinic patients. At follow-up the men classified themselves directly in addition to answering the original series of related questions. In the present article, we report the results of a new discriminant function, based on the MMAS men at follow-up. We also compare the two methods and discuss our reasons for preferring the internally calibrated method. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

AB - Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the subject of a vast clinical literature, but little information has been gathered from random samples of the general public. The Massachusetts Male Aging Study (MMAS) addressed this important aspect of men's health. The MMAS was conducted in two waves, with baseline data collection in 1987-1989 and follow-up in 1995-1997. Subsequent to the baseline MMAS survey, a consensus developed that subjective measures are optimal for defining ED. Unfortunately, the baseline questionnaire did not ask subjects directly about their erectile functioning. Thus, we previously assigned the MMAS subjects a degree of impotence at baseline using a series of related questions, employing a discriminant formula constructed from a separate sample of urology clinic patients. At follow-up the men classified themselves directly in addition to answering the original series of related questions. In the present article, we report the results of a new discriminant function, based on the MMAS men at follow-up. We also compare the two methods and discuss our reasons for preferring the internally calibrated method. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

KW - Aging

KW - Discriminant analysis

KW - Erectile dysfunction

KW - Men

KW - Population study

KW - Prevalence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033965939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033965939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00150-X

DO - 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00150-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 10693906

AN - SCOPUS:0033965939

VL - 53

SP - 71

EP - 78

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 1

ER -