A new, simple method for estimating pleural effusion size on CT scans

Matthew P. Moy, Jeffrey M. Levsky, Netanel S. Berko, Alla Godelman, Vineet R. Jain, Linda B. Haramati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is no standardized system to grade pleural effusion size on CT scans. A validated, systematic grading system would improve communication of findings and may help determine the need for imaging guidance for thoracentesis. Methods: CT scans of 34 patients demonstrating a wide range of pleural effusion sizes were measured with a volume segmentation tool and reviewed for qualitative and simple quantitative features related to size. A classification rule was developed using the features that best predicted size and distinguished among small, moderate, and large effusions. Inter-reader agreement for effusion size was assessed on the CT scans for three groups of physicians (radiology residents, pulmonologists, and cardiothoracic radiologists) before and after implementation of the classification rule. Results: The CT imaging features found to best classify effusions as small, moderate, or large were anteroposterior (AP) quartile and maximum AP depth measured at the midclavicular line. According to the decision rule, first AP-quartile effusions are small, second AP-quartile effusions are moderate, and third or fourth AP-quartile effusions are large. In borderline cases, AP depth is measured with 3-cm and 10-cm thresholds for the upper limit of small and moderate, respectively. Use of the rule improved interobserver agreement from k = 0.56 to 0.79 for all physicians, 0.59 to 0.73 for radiology residents, 0.54 to 0.76 for pulmonologists, and 0.74 to 0.85 for cardiothoracic radiologists. Conclusions: A simple, two-step decision rule for sizing pleural effusions on CT scans improves interobserver agreement from moderate to substantial levels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1054-1059
Number of pages6
JournalChest
Volume143
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Pleural Effusion
Radiology
Physicians
Communication
Radiologists
Pulmonologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

A new, simple method for estimating pleural effusion size on CT scans. / Moy, Matthew P.; Levsky, Jeffrey M.; Berko, Netanel S.; Godelman, Alla; Jain, Vineet R.; Haramati, Linda B.

In: Chest, Vol. 143, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 1054-1059.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moy, Matthew P. ; Levsky, Jeffrey M. ; Berko, Netanel S. ; Godelman, Alla ; Jain, Vineet R. ; Haramati, Linda B. / A new, simple method for estimating pleural effusion size on CT scans. In: Chest. 2013 ; Vol. 143, No. 4. pp. 1054-1059.
@article{0634020f5fff461592c3905c9cc33c77,
title = "A new, simple method for estimating pleural effusion size on CT scans",
abstract = "Background: There is no standardized system to grade pleural effusion size on CT scans. A validated, systematic grading system would improve communication of findings and may help determine the need for imaging guidance for thoracentesis. Methods: CT scans of 34 patients demonstrating a wide range of pleural effusion sizes were measured with a volume segmentation tool and reviewed for qualitative and simple quantitative features related to size. A classification rule was developed using the features that best predicted size and distinguished among small, moderate, and large effusions. Inter-reader agreement for effusion size was assessed on the CT scans for three groups of physicians (radiology residents, pulmonologists, and cardiothoracic radiologists) before and after implementation of the classification rule. Results: The CT imaging features found to best classify effusions as small, moderate, or large were anteroposterior (AP) quartile and maximum AP depth measured at the midclavicular line. According to the decision rule, first AP-quartile effusions are small, second AP-quartile effusions are moderate, and third or fourth AP-quartile effusions are large. In borderline cases, AP depth is measured with 3-cm and 10-cm thresholds for the upper limit of small and moderate, respectively. Use of the rule improved interobserver agreement from k = 0.56 to 0.79 for all physicians, 0.59 to 0.73 for radiology residents, 0.54 to 0.76 for pulmonologists, and 0.74 to 0.85 for cardiothoracic radiologists. Conclusions: A simple, two-step decision rule for sizing pleural effusions on CT scans improves interobserver agreement from moderate to substantial levels.",
author = "Moy, {Matthew P.} and Levsky, {Jeffrey M.} and Berko, {Netanel S.} and Alla Godelman and Jain, {Vineet R.} and Haramati, {Linda B.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1378/chest.12-1292",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "143",
pages = "1054--1059",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new, simple method for estimating pleural effusion size on CT scans

AU - Moy, Matthew P.

AU - Levsky, Jeffrey M.

AU - Berko, Netanel S.

AU - Godelman, Alla

AU - Jain, Vineet R.

AU - Haramati, Linda B.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Background: There is no standardized system to grade pleural effusion size on CT scans. A validated, systematic grading system would improve communication of findings and may help determine the need for imaging guidance for thoracentesis. Methods: CT scans of 34 patients demonstrating a wide range of pleural effusion sizes were measured with a volume segmentation tool and reviewed for qualitative and simple quantitative features related to size. A classification rule was developed using the features that best predicted size and distinguished among small, moderate, and large effusions. Inter-reader agreement for effusion size was assessed on the CT scans for three groups of physicians (radiology residents, pulmonologists, and cardiothoracic radiologists) before and after implementation of the classification rule. Results: The CT imaging features found to best classify effusions as small, moderate, or large were anteroposterior (AP) quartile and maximum AP depth measured at the midclavicular line. According to the decision rule, first AP-quartile effusions are small, second AP-quartile effusions are moderate, and third or fourth AP-quartile effusions are large. In borderline cases, AP depth is measured with 3-cm and 10-cm thresholds for the upper limit of small and moderate, respectively. Use of the rule improved interobserver agreement from k = 0.56 to 0.79 for all physicians, 0.59 to 0.73 for radiology residents, 0.54 to 0.76 for pulmonologists, and 0.74 to 0.85 for cardiothoracic radiologists. Conclusions: A simple, two-step decision rule for sizing pleural effusions on CT scans improves interobserver agreement from moderate to substantial levels.

AB - Background: There is no standardized system to grade pleural effusion size on CT scans. A validated, systematic grading system would improve communication of findings and may help determine the need for imaging guidance for thoracentesis. Methods: CT scans of 34 patients demonstrating a wide range of pleural effusion sizes were measured with a volume segmentation tool and reviewed for qualitative and simple quantitative features related to size. A classification rule was developed using the features that best predicted size and distinguished among small, moderate, and large effusions. Inter-reader agreement for effusion size was assessed on the CT scans for three groups of physicians (radiology residents, pulmonologists, and cardiothoracic radiologists) before and after implementation of the classification rule. Results: The CT imaging features found to best classify effusions as small, moderate, or large were anteroposterior (AP) quartile and maximum AP depth measured at the midclavicular line. According to the decision rule, first AP-quartile effusions are small, second AP-quartile effusions are moderate, and third or fourth AP-quartile effusions are large. In borderline cases, AP depth is measured with 3-cm and 10-cm thresholds for the upper limit of small and moderate, respectively. Use of the rule improved interobserver agreement from k = 0.56 to 0.79 for all physicians, 0.59 to 0.73 for radiology residents, 0.54 to 0.76 for pulmonologists, and 0.74 to 0.85 for cardiothoracic radiologists. Conclusions: A simple, two-step decision rule for sizing pleural effusions on CT scans improves interobserver agreement from moderate to substantial levels.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875992358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875992358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.12-1292

DO - 10.1378/chest.12-1292

M3 - Article

VL - 143

SP - 1054

EP - 1059

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 4

ER -