A new method to measure anatomic knee alignment for large studies of OA: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Tannaz Iranpour Boroujeni, J. Li, J. A. Lynch, M. Nevitt, J. Duryea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a new and improved software method to rapidly determine femur-tibia angle (FTA). Methods: Three readers, two skilled and one unskilled, without any formal medical training, measured FTA in 142 subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). The reader reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), root mean square standard deviation (RMSSD), and Bland-Altman plots, comparing the existing and new FTA methods. Gender-specific linear regression assessed the relationship of FTA with the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). Results: The ICC (RMSSD) for intra- and inter-reader reproducibility of the existing FTA method was 0.96 (0.77°) and 0.92 (1.38°), respectively, and for the new technique was 0.98 (0.25°) and 0.98 (0.37°), with similar results for all three readers. Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were greater than ±2° for the existing, and ±1° for the new method. The r-value for the relation of FTA to HKA was 0.68 and 0.72 for the existing and new methods, respectively. Varus (HKA≤-2°)/neutral (-2°<HKA<2°)/valgus (HKAρ2°) alignment based on predicted HKA agreed moderately with measured HKA (weighted kappa=0.53), and had moderate sensitivity (73%) and specificity (84%) for varus malalignment. The new FTA was related to HKA using a linear equation with a slope of 0.98 and an offset of 4.0°. Conclusions: Since it is largely automated and uses unambiguous anatomical landmarks, the new method is highly reproducible and can be made on a standard posteroanterior (PA) knee radiograph by a relatively unskilled reader.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1668-1674
Number of pages7
JournalOsteoarthritis and Cartilage
Volume22
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Linear equations
Linear regression
Osteoarthritis
Tibia
Ankle
Knee
Femur
Hip
Linear Models
Software
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Knee alignment
  • Knee radiography
  • Quantitative imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rheumatology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A new method to measure anatomic knee alignment for large studies of OA : Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. / Iranpour Boroujeni, Tannaz; Li, J.; Lynch, J. A.; Nevitt, M.; Duryea, J.

In: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Vol. 22, No. 10, 01.10.2014, p. 1668-1674.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b09d5537346426898402db1ae08ec61,
title = "A new method to measure anatomic knee alignment for large studies of OA: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative",
abstract = "Objective: To develop and validate a new and improved software method to rapidly determine femur-tibia angle (FTA). Methods: Three readers, two skilled and one unskilled, without any formal medical training, measured FTA in 142 subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). The reader reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), root mean square standard deviation (RMSSD), and Bland-Altman plots, comparing the existing and new FTA methods. Gender-specific linear regression assessed the relationship of FTA with the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). Results: The ICC (RMSSD) for intra- and inter-reader reproducibility of the existing FTA method was 0.96 (0.77°) and 0.92 (1.38°), respectively, and for the new technique was 0.98 (0.25°) and 0.98 (0.37°), with similar results for all three readers. Bland-Altman 95{\%} limits of agreement were greater than ±2° for the existing, and ±1° for the new method. The r-value for the relation of FTA to HKA was 0.68 and 0.72 for the existing and new methods, respectively. Varus (HKA≤-2°)/neutral (-2°<HKA<2°)/valgus (HKAρ2°) alignment based on predicted HKA agreed moderately with measured HKA (weighted kappa=0.53), and had moderate sensitivity (73{\%}) and specificity (84{\%}) for varus malalignment. The new FTA was related to HKA using a linear equation with a slope of 0.98 and an offset of 4.0°. Conclusions: Since it is largely automated and uses unambiguous anatomical landmarks, the new method is highly reproducible and can be made on a standard posteroanterior (PA) knee radiograph by a relatively unskilled reader.",
keywords = "Knee alignment, Knee radiography, Quantitative imaging",
author = "{Iranpour Boroujeni}, Tannaz and J. Li and Lynch, {J. A.} and M. Nevitt and J. Duryea",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1668--1674",
journal = "Osteoarthritis and Cartilage",
issn = "1063-4584",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new method to measure anatomic knee alignment for large studies of OA

T2 - Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

AU - Iranpour Boroujeni, Tannaz

AU - Li, J.

AU - Lynch, J. A.

AU - Nevitt, M.

AU - Duryea, J.

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Objective: To develop and validate a new and improved software method to rapidly determine femur-tibia angle (FTA). Methods: Three readers, two skilled and one unskilled, without any formal medical training, measured FTA in 142 subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). The reader reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), root mean square standard deviation (RMSSD), and Bland-Altman plots, comparing the existing and new FTA methods. Gender-specific linear regression assessed the relationship of FTA with the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). Results: The ICC (RMSSD) for intra- and inter-reader reproducibility of the existing FTA method was 0.96 (0.77°) and 0.92 (1.38°), respectively, and for the new technique was 0.98 (0.25°) and 0.98 (0.37°), with similar results for all three readers. Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were greater than ±2° for the existing, and ±1° for the new method. The r-value for the relation of FTA to HKA was 0.68 and 0.72 for the existing and new methods, respectively. Varus (HKA≤-2°)/neutral (-2°<HKA<2°)/valgus (HKAρ2°) alignment based on predicted HKA agreed moderately with measured HKA (weighted kappa=0.53), and had moderate sensitivity (73%) and specificity (84%) for varus malalignment. The new FTA was related to HKA using a linear equation with a slope of 0.98 and an offset of 4.0°. Conclusions: Since it is largely automated and uses unambiguous anatomical landmarks, the new method is highly reproducible and can be made on a standard posteroanterior (PA) knee radiograph by a relatively unskilled reader.

AB - Objective: To develop and validate a new and improved software method to rapidly determine femur-tibia angle (FTA). Methods: Three readers, two skilled and one unskilled, without any formal medical training, measured FTA in 142 subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). The reader reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), root mean square standard deviation (RMSSD), and Bland-Altman plots, comparing the existing and new FTA methods. Gender-specific linear regression assessed the relationship of FTA with the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). Results: The ICC (RMSSD) for intra- and inter-reader reproducibility of the existing FTA method was 0.96 (0.77°) and 0.92 (1.38°), respectively, and for the new technique was 0.98 (0.25°) and 0.98 (0.37°), with similar results for all three readers. Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were greater than ±2° for the existing, and ±1° for the new method. The r-value for the relation of FTA to HKA was 0.68 and 0.72 for the existing and new methods, respectively. Varus (HKA≤-2°)/neutral (-2°<HKA<2°)/valgus (HKAρ2°) alignment based on predicted HKA agreed moderately with measured HKA (weighted kappa=0.53), and had moderate sensitivity (73%) and specificity (84%) for varus malalignment. The new FTA was related to HKA using a linear equation with a slope of 0.98 and an offset of 4.0°. Conclusions: Since it is largely automated and uses unambiguous anatomical landmarks, the new method is highly reproducible and can be made on a standard posteroanterior (PA) knee radiograph by a relatively unskilled reader.

KW - Knee alignment

KW - Knee radiography

KW - Quantitative imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908220139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908220139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.011

DO - 10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 25278076

AN - SCOPUS:84908220139

VL - 22

SP - 1668

EP - 1674

JO - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

JF - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

SN - 1063-4584

IS - 10

ER -