TY - JOUR
T1 - A modified simple triage and rapid treatment algorithm from the New York City (USA) fire department
AU - Arshad, Faizan H.
AU - Williams, Alan
AU - Asaeda, Glenn
AU - Isaacs, Douglas
AU - Kaufman, Bradley
AU - Ben-Eli, David
AU - Gonzalez, Dario
AU - Freese, John P.
AU - Hillgardner, Joan
AU - Weakley, Jessica
AU - Hall, Charles B.
AU - Webber, Mayris P.
AU - Prezant, David J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2015.
PY - 2015/2/17
Y1 - 2015/2/17
N2 - Introduction The objective of this study was to determine if modification of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) system by the addition of an Orange category, intermediate between the most critically injured (Red) and the non-critical, non-ambulatory injured (Yellow), would reduce over- and under-triage rates in a simulated mass-casualty incident (MCI) exercise. Methods A computer-simulation exercise of identical presentations of an MCI scenario involving a 2-train collision, with 28 case scenarios, was provided for triaging to two groups: the Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY; n = 1,347) using modified START, and the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers from the Eagles 2012 EMS conference (Lafayette, Louisiana USA; n = 110) using unmodified START. Percent correct by triage category was calculated for each group. Performance was then compared between the two EMS groups on the five cases where Orange was the correct answer under the modified START system. Results Overall, FDNY-EMS providers correctly triaged 91.2% of cases using FDNY-START whereas non-FDNY-Eagles providers correctly triaged 87.1% of cases using unmodified START. In analysis of the five Orange cases (chest pain or dyspnea without obvious trauma), FDNY-EMS performed significantly better using FDNY-START, correctly triaging 86.3% of cases (over-triage 1.5%; under-triage 12.2%), whereas the non-FDNY-Eagles group using unmodified START correctly triaged 81.5% of cases (over-triage 17.3%; under-triage 1.3%), a difference of 4.9% (95% CI, 1.5-8.2). Conclusions The FDNY-START system may allow providers to prioritize casualties using an intermediate category (Orange) more properly aligned to meet patient needs, and as such, may reduce the rates of over-triage compared with START. The FDNY-START system decreases the variability in patient sorting while maintaining high field utility without needing computer assistance or extensive retraining. Comparison of triage algorithms at actual MCIs is needed; however, initial feedback is promising, suggesting that FDNY-START can improve triage with minimal additional training and cost. Arshad FH, Williams A, Asaeda G, Isaacs D, Kaufman B, Ben-Eli D, Gonzalez D, Freese JP, Hillgardner J, Weakley J, Hall CB, Webber MP, Prezant DJ.
AB - Introduction The objective of this study was to determine if modification of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) system by the addition of an Orange category, intermediate between the most critically injured (Red) and the non-critical, non-ambulatory injured (Yellow), would reduce over- and under-triage rates in a simulated mass-casualty incident (MCI) exercise. Methods A computer-simulation exercise of identical presentations of an MCI scenario involving a 2-train collision, with 28 case scenarios, was provided for triaging to two groups: the Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY; n = 1,347) using modified START, and the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers from the Eagles 2012 EMS conference (Lafayette, Louisiana USA; n = 110) using unmodified START. Percent correct by triage category was calculated for each group. Performance was then compared between the two EMS groups on the five cases where Orange was the correct answer under the modified START system. Results Overall, FDNY-EMS providers correctly triaged 91.2% of cases using FDNY-START whereas non-FDNY-Eagles providers correctly triaged 87.1% of cases using unmodified START. In analysis of the five Orange cases (chest pain or dyspnea without obvious trauma), FDNY-EMS performed significantly better using FDNY-START, correctly triaging 86.3% of cases (over-triage 1.5%; under-triage 12.2%), whereas the non-FDNY-Eagles group using unmodified START correctly triaged 81.5% of cases (over-triage 17.3%; under-triage 1.3%), a difference of 4.9% (95% CI, 1.5-8.2). Conclusions The FDNY-START system may allow providers to prioritize casualties using an intermediate category (Orange) more properly aligned to meet patient needs, and as such, may reduce the rates of over-triage compared with START. The FDNY-START system decreases the variability in patient sorting while maintaining high field utility without needing computer assistance or extensive retraining. Comparison of triage algorithms at actual MCIs is needed; however, initial feedback is promising, suggesting that FDNY-START can improve triage with minimal additional training and cost. Arshad FH, Williams A, Asaeda G, Isaacs D, Kaufman B, Ben-Eli D, Gonzalez D, Freese JP, Hillgardner J, Weakley J, Hall CB, Webber MP, Prezant DJ.
KW - Emergency Medical Services
KW - assessment
KW - disaster
KW - mass-casualty incident
KW - simulation
KW - triage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925442503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925442503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1049023X14001447
DO - 10.1017/S1049023X14001447
M3 - Article
C2 - 25687598
AN - SCOPUS:84925442503
SN - 1049-023X
VL - 30
SP - 199
EP - 204
JO - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
JF - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
IS - 2
ER -