A Delusion Assessment Scale for Psychotic Major Depression: Reliability, Validity, and Utility

Barnett S. Meyers, Judith English, Michelle Gabriele, Catherine Peasley-Miklus, Moonseong Heo, Alastair J. Flint, Benoit H. Mulsant, Anthony J. Rothschild

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although delusions are the hallmark of major depression with psychotic features, a scale to measure the intensity of beliefs across multiple delusional domains in this condition has been unavailable. The development and assessment of the Delusional Assessment Scale (DAS) are described. Methods: Scale items were selected initially based on previous studies of delusional ideation in schizophrenia. A three-point item to assess mood congruence was added. A 15-item scale was assessed in 92 subjects participating in the four-site collaborative study of the pharmacotherapy of major depression with psychotic features. Maximum likelihood method was used to determine scale factors. The internal consistency of these factors was determined. Comparisons between scale scores and ratings from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Overall and Gorham 1962) were used to assess convergent and discriminant validity. Results: The data were fit by a five-factors model (impact, conviction, disorganization, bizarreness, and extension). Inter-rater reliability of the five factors ranged from .77 for conviction and .74 for impact to .37 for disorganization. Internal consistency for each of the five factors was ≥.72. Scores on specific domains were significantly correlated with the BPRS unusual thought content item and positive symptom subscale scores. Conclusions: The DAS is a reliable measure of 5 delusional domains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1336-1342
Number of pages7
JournalBiological Psychiatry
Volume60
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale
Delusions
Reproducibility of Results
Depression
Schizophrenia
Drug Therapy

Keywords

  • bizarreness
  • conviction
  • Delusions
  • depression
  • disorganization
  • impact

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Meyers, B. S., English, J., Gabriele, M., Peasley-Miklus, C., Heo, M., Flint, A. J., ... Rothschild, A. J. (2006). A Delusion Assessment Scale for Psychotic Major Depression: Reliability, Validity, and Utility. Biological Psychiatry, 60(12), 1336-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.033

A Delusion Assessment Scale for Psychotic Major Depression : Reliability, Validity, and Utility. / Meyers, Barnett S.; English, Judith; Gabriele, Michelle; Peasley-Miklus, Catherine; Heo, Moonseong; Flint, Alastair J.; Mulsant, Benoit H.; Rothschild, Anthony J.

In: Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 60, No. 12, 15.12.2006, p. 1336-1342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meyers, BS, English, J, Gabriele, M, Peasley-Miklus, C, Heo, M, Flint, AJ, Mulsant, BH & Rothschild, AJ 2006, 'A Delusion Assessment Scale for Psychotic Major Depression: Reliability, Validity, and Utility', Biological Psychiatry, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 1336-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.033
Meyers BS, English J, Gabriele M, Peasley-Miklus C, Heo M, Flint AJ et al. A Delusion Assessment Scale for Psychotic Major Depression: Reliability, Validity, and Utility. Biological Psychiatry. 2006 Dec 15;60(12):1336-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.033
Meyers, Barnett S. ; English, Judith ; Gabriele, Michelle ; Peasley-Miklus, Catherine ; Heo, Moonseong ; Flint, Alastair J. ; Mulsant, Benoit H. ; Rothschild, Anthony J. / A Delusion Assessment Scale for Psychotic Major Depression : Reliability, Validity, and Utility. In: Biological Psychiatry. 2006 ; Vol. 60, No. 12. pp. 1336-1342.
@article{09e6c4900ff140c097c5eb1f8306b81f,
title = "A Delusion Assessment Scale for Psychotic Major Depression: Reliability, Validity, and Utility",
abstract = "Background: Although delusions are the hallmark of major depression with psychotic features, a scale to measure the intensity of beliefs across multiple delusional domains in this condition has been unavailable. The development and assessment of the Delusional Assessment Scale (DAS) are described. Methods: Scale items were selected initially based on previous studies of delusional ideation in schizophrenia. A three-point item to assess mood congruence was added. A 15-item scale was assessed in 92 subjects participating in the four-site collaborative study of the pharmacotherapy of major depression with psychotic features. Maximum likelihood method was used to determine scale factors. The internal consistency of these factors was determined. Comparisons between scale scores and ratings from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Overall and Gorham 1962) were used to assess convergent and discriminant validity. Results: The data were fit by a five-factors model (impact, conviction, disorganization, bizarreness, and extension). Inter-rater reliability of the five factors ranged from .77 for conviction and .74 for impact to .37 for disorganization. Internal consistency for each of the five factors was ≥.72. Scores on specific domains were significantly correlated with the BPRS unusual thought content item and positive symptom subscale scores. Conclusions: The DAS is a reliable measure of 5 delusional domains.",
keywords = "bizarreness, conviction, Delusions, depression, disorganization, impact",
author = "Meyers, {Barnett S.} and Judith English and Michelle Gabriele and Catherine Peasley-Miklus and Moonseong Heo and Flint, {Alastair J.} and Mulsant, {Benoit H.} and Rothschild, {Anthony J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "1336--1342",
journal = "Biological Psychiatry",
issn = "0006-3223",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Delusion Assessment Scale for Psychotic Major Depression

T2 - Reliability, Validity, and Utility

AU - Meyers, Barnett S.

AU - English, Judith

AU - Gabriele, Michelle

AU - Peasley-Miklus, Catherine

AU - Heo, Moonseong

AU - Flint, Alastair J.

AU - Mulsant, Benoit H.

AU - Rothschild, Anthony J.

PY - 2006/12/15

Y1 - 2006/12/15

N2 - Background: Although delusions are the hallmark of major depression with psychotic features, a scale to measure the intensity of beliefs across multiple delusional domains in this condition has been unavailable. The development and assessment of the Delusional Assessment Scale (DAS) are described. Methods: Scale items were selected initially based on previous studies of delusional ideation in schizophrenia. A three-point item to assess mood congruence was added. A 15-item scale was assessed in 92 subjects participating in the four-site collaborative study of the pharmacotherapy of major depression with psychotic features. Maximum likelihood method was used to determine scale factors. The internal consistency of these factors was determined. Comparisons between scale scores and ratings from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Overall and Gorham 1962) were used to assess convergent and discriminant validity. Results: The data were fit by a five-factors model (impact, conviction, disorganization, bizarreness, and extension). Inter-rater reliability of the five factors ranged from .77 for conviction and .74 for impact to .37 for disorganization. Internal consistency for each of the five factors was ≥.72. Scores on specific domains were significantly correlated with the BPRS unusual thought content item and positive symptom subscale scores. Conclusions: The DAS is a reliable measure of 5 delusional domains.

AB - Background: Although delusions are the hallmark of major depression with psychotic features, a scale to measure the intensity of beliefs across multiple delusional domains in this condition has been unavailable. The development and assessment of the Delusional Assessment Scale (DAS) are described. Methods: Scale items were selected initially based on previous studies of delusional ideation in schizophrenia. A three-point item to assess mood congruence was added. A 15-item scale was assessed in 92 subjects participating in the four-site collaborative study of the pharmacotherapy of major depression with psychotic features. Maximum likelihood method was used to determine scale factors. The internal consistency of these factors was determined. Comparisons between scale scores and ratings from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Overall and Gorham 1962) were used to assess convergent and discriminant validity. Results: The data were fit by a five-factors model (impact, conviction, disorganization, bizarreness, and extension). Inter-rater reliability of the five factors ranged from .77 for conviction and .74 for impact to .37 for disorganization. Internal consistency for each of the five factors was ≥.72. Scores on specific domains were significantly correlated with the BPRS unusual thought content item and positive symptom subscale scores. Conclusions: The DAS is a reliable measure of 5 delusional domains.

KW - bizarreness

KW - conviction

KW - Delusions

KW - depression

KW - disorganization

KW - impact

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845209436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845209436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.033

DO - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.033

M3 - Article

C2 - 17046724

AN - SCOPUS:33845209436

VL - 60

SP - 1336

EP - 1342

JO - Biological Psychiatry

JF - Biological Psychiatry

SN - 0006-3223

IS - 12

ER -