A cross-sectional study on the acceptability of self-collection for HPV testing among women in rural China

YaoYao Guan, Philip E. Castle, Shaoming Wang, Belinda Li, Changyan Feng, Puwa Ci, Xue Li, Patti Gravitt, You Lin Qiao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the acceptability of using self-collection as a method of sampling for human papilloma virus testing in rural China. Methods: 174 women from the national cervical cancer screening programme in Xiangyuan County, China, were enrolled in our study and underwent self-collection, clinician collection, colposcopy examination and were administered questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed the patients' preference and acceptability of collection method. Results: The mean overall acceptability score for self-collection, although significantly less than the overall score for clinician collection (p<0.01), still is well above 4 (4.33 of 5), indicating high acceptability. The acceptability scores for self-collection and clinician collection were not significantly different on scales measuring comfort and convenience (p>0.05). The scores were significantly lower for self-collection on scales measuring trust, ability to collect specimen and perceived effects of testing compared with clinician collection (p<0.01). 74% of participants preferred clinician collection, and of these participants, 86% preferred it because they thought the results were more accurate. Conclusions: The study shows that self-collection was highly acceptable and that self-collection and clinician collection were equally comfortable and convenient; however, the participants still preferred clinician collection because of lack of trust in the results of self-collection. This indicates that self-collection is an acceptable potential method for screening but education programmes about the validity of self-collection that target general population may be needed prior to implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)490-494
Number of pages5
JournalSexually Transmitted Infections
Volume88
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

China
Cross-Sectional Studies
Papillomaviridae
Colposcopy
Aptitude
Patient Preference
Health Services Needs and Demand
Early Detection of Cancer
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

A cross-sectional study on the acceptability of self-collection for HPV testing among women in rural China. / Guan, YaoYao; Castle, Philip E.; Wang, Shaoming; Li, Belinda; Feng, Changyan; Ci, Puwa; Li, Xue; Gravitt, Patti; Qiao, You Lin.

In: Sexually Transmitted Infections, Vol. 88, No. 7, 11.2012, p. 490-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Guan, YaoYao ; Castle, Philip E. ; Wang, Shaoming ; Li, Belinda ; Feng, Changyan ; Ci, Puwa ; Li, Xue ; Gravitt, Patti ; Qiao, You Lin. / A cross-sectional study on the acceptability of self-collection for HPV testing among women in rural China. In: Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2012 ; Vol. 88, No. 7. pp. 490-494.
@article{bce9e4048a2c4d23b1e71e667df8229d,
title = "A cross-sectional study on the acceptability of self-collection for HPV testing among women in rural China",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the acceptability of using self-collection as a method of sampling for human papilloma virus testing in rural China. Methods: 174 women from the national cervical cancer screening programme in Xiangyuan County, China, were enrolled in our study and underwent self-collection, clinician collection, colposcopy examination and were administered questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed the patients' preference and acceptability of collection method. Results: The mean overall acceptability score for self-collection, although significantly less than the overall score for clinician collection (p<0.01), still is well above 4 (4.33 of 5), indicating high acceptability. The acceptability scores for self-collection and clinician collection were not significantly different on scales measuring comfort and convenience (p>0.05). The scores were significantly lower for self-collection on scales measuring trust, ability to collect specimen and perceived effects of testing compared with clinician collection (p<0.01). 74{\%} of participants preferred clinician collection, and of these participants, 86{\%} preferred it because they thought the results were more accurate. Conclusions: The study shows that self-collection was highly acceptable and that self-collection and clinician collection were equally comfortable and convenient; however, the participants still preferred clinician collection because of lack of trust in the results of self-collection. This indicates that self-collection is an acceptable potential method for screening but education programmes about the validity of self-collection that target general population may be needed prior to implementation.",
author = "YaoYao Guan and Castle, {Philip E.} and Shaoming Wang and Belinda Li and Changyan Feng and Puwa Ci and Xue Li and Patti Gravitt and Qiao, {You Lin}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1136/sextrans-2012-050477",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "490--494",
journal = "Sexually Transmitted Infections",
issn = "1368-4973",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cross-sectional study on the acceptability of self-collection for HPV testing among women in rural China

AU - Guan, YaoYao

AU - Castle, Philip E.

AU - Wang, Shaoming

AU - Li, Belinda

AU - Feng, Changyan

AU - Ci, Puwa

AU - Li, Xue

AU - Gravitt, Patti

AU - Qiao, You Lin

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Objective: To assess the acceptability of using self-collection as a method of sampling for human papilloma virus testing in rural China. Methods: 174 women from the national cervical cancer screening programme in Xiangyuan County, China, were enrolled in our study and underwent self-collection, clinician collection, colposcopy examination and were administered questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed the patients' preference and acceptability of collection method. Results: The mean overall acceptability score for self-collection, although significantly less than the overall score for clinician collection (p<0.01), still is well above 4 (4.33 of 5), indicating high acceptability. The acceptability scores for self-collection and clinician collection were not significantly different on scales measuring comfort and convenience (p>0.05). The scores were significantly lower for self-collection on scales measuring trust, ability to collect specimen and perceived effects of testing compared with clinician collection (p<0.01). 74% of participants preferred clinician collection, and of these participants, 86% preferred it because they thought the results were more accurate. Conclusions: The study shows that self-collection was highly acceptable and that self-collection and clinician collection were equally comfortable and convenient; however, the participants still preferred clinician collection because of lack of trust in the results of self-collection. This indicates that self-collection is an acceptable potential method for screening but education programmes about the validity of self-collection that target general population may be needed prior to implementation.

AB - Objective: To assess the acceptability of using self-collection as a method of sampling for human papilloma virus testing in rural China. Methods: 174 women from the national cervical cancer screening programme in Xiangyuan County, China, were enrolled in our study and underwent self-collection, clinician collection, colposcopy examination and were administered questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed the patients' preference and acceptability of collection method. Results: The mean overall acceptability score for self-collection, although significantly less than the overall score for clinician collection (p<0.01), still is well above 4 (4.33 of 5), indicating high acceptability. The acceptability scores for self-collection and clinician collection were not significantly different on scales measuring comfort and convenience (p>0.05). The scores were significantly lower for self-collection on scales measuring trust, ability to collect specimen and perceived effects of testing compared with clinician collection (p<0.01). 74% of participants preferred clinician collection, and of these participants, 86% preferred it because they thought the results were more accurate. Conclusions: The study shows that self-collection was highly acceptable and that self-collection and clinician collection were equally comfortable and convenient; however, the participants still preferred clinician collection because of lack of trust in the results of self-collection. This indicates that self-collection is an acceptable potential method for screening but education programmes about the validity of self-collection that target general population may be needed prior to implementation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871370419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871370419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050477

DO - 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050477

M3 - Article

C2 - 22645391

AN - SCOPUS:84871370419

VL - 88

SP - 490

EP - 494

JO - Sexually Transmitted Infections

JF - Sexually Transmitted Infections

SN - 1368-4973

IS - 7

ER -