A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance

Vimal K. Narula, William C. Watson, S. Scott Davis, Kristen Hinshaw, Bradley J. Needleman, Dean J. Mikami, Jeffrey W. Hazey, John H. Winston, Peter Muscarella, Mike Rubin, Vipul Patel, W. Scott Melvin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic technology has been postulated to improve performance in advanced surgical skills. We utilized a novel computerized assessment system to objectively describe the technical enhancement in task performance comparing robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation. Methods and procedures: Advanced laparoscopic surgeons (2-10 yrs experience) performed three unique task modules using laparoscopic and Telerobotic surgical instrumentation (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Performance was evaluated using a computerized assessment system (ProMIS, Dublin, Ireland) and results were recorded as time (s), path (mm) and precision. Each surgeon had an initial training session followed by two testing sessions for each module. A paired Student's t-test was used to analyze the data. Results: Ten surgeons completed the study. 8/10 surgeons had significant technical enhancement utilizing robotic technology. Conclusions: The ProMIS computerized assessment system can be modified to objectively obtain task performance data with robotic instrumentation. All the tasks were performed faster and with more precision using the robotic technology than standard laparoscopy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2258-2261
Number of pages4
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume21
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Task Performance and Analysis
Robotics
Technology
Ireland
Laparoscopy
Students
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Human/robotic
  • Technical education instruments
  • Technical training/courses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance. / Narula, Vimal K.; Watson, William C.; Davis, S. Scott; Hinshaw, Kristen; Needleman, Bradley J.; Mikami, Dean J.; Hazey, Jeffrey W.; Winston, John H.; Muscarella, Peter; Rubin, Mike; Patel, Vipul; Melvin, W. Scott.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 21, No. 12, 12.2007, p. 2258-2261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Narula, VK, Watson, WC, Davis, SS, Hinshaw, K, Needleman, BJ, Mikami, DJ, Hazey, JW, Winston, JH, Muscarella, P, Rubin, M, Patel, V & Melvin, WS 2007, 'A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance', Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2258-2261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9363-0
Narula, Vimal K. ; Watson, William C. ; Davis, S. Scott ; Hinshaw, Kristen ; Needleman, Bradley J. ; Mikami, Dean J. ; Hazey, Jeffrey W. ; Winston, John H. ; Muscarella, Peter ; Rubin, Mike ; Patel, Vipul ; Melvin, W. Scott. / A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2007 ; Vol. 21, No. 12. pp. 2258-2261.
@article{22aefd91c7dc4503bbca608ae2440540,
title = "A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance",
abstract = "Introduction: Robotic technology has been postulated to improve performance in advanced surgical skills. We utilized a novel computerized assessment system to objectively describe the technical enhancement in task performance comparing robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation. Methods and procedures: Advanced laparoscopic surgeons (2-10 yrs experience) performed three unique task modules using laparoscopic and Telerobotic surgical instrumentation (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Performance was evaluated using a computerized assessment system (ProMIS, Dublin, Ireland) and results were recorded as time (s), path (mm) and precision. Each surgeon had an initial training session followed by two testing sessions for each module. A paired Student's t-test was used to analyze the data. Results: Ten surgeons completed the study. 8/10 surgeons had significant technical enhancement utilizing robotic technology. Conclusions: The ProMIS computerized assessment system can be modified to objectively obtain task performance data with robotic instrumentation. All the tasks were performed faster and with more precision using the robotic technology than standard laparoscopy.",
keywords = "Human/robotic, Technical education instruments, Technical training/courses",
author = "Narula, {Vimal K.} and Watson, {William C.} and Davis, {S. Scott} and Kristen Hinshaw and Needleman, {Bradley J.} and Mikami, {Dean J.} and Hazey, {Jeffrey W.} and Winston, {John H.} and Peter Muscarella and Mike Rubin and Vipul Patel and Melvin, {W. Scott}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-007-9363-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "2258--2261",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance

AU - Narula, Vimal K.

AU - Watson, William C.

AU - Davis, S. Scott

AU - Hinshaw, Kristen

AU - Needleman, Bradley J.

AU - Mikami, Dean J.

AU - Hazey, Jeffrey W.

AU - Winston, John H.

AU - Muscarella, Peter

AU - Rubin, Mike

AU - Patel, Vipul

AU - Melvin, W. Scott

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - Introduction: Robotic technology has been postulated to improve performance in advanced surgical skills. We utilized a novel computerized assessment system to objectively describe the technical enhancement in task performance comparing robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation. Methods and procedures: Advanced laparoscopic surgeons (2-10 yrs experience) performed three unique task modules using laparoscopic and Telerobotic surgical instrumentation (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Performance was evaluated using a computerized assessment system (ProMIS, Dublin, Ireland) and results were recorded as time (s), path (mm) and precision. Each surgeon had an initial training session followed by two testing sessions for each module. A paired Student's t-test was used to analyze the data. Results: Ten surgeons completed the study. 8/10 surgeons had significant technical enhancement utilizing robotic technology. Conclusions: The ProMIS computerized assessment system can be modified to objectively obtain task performance data with robotic instrumentation. All the tasks were performed faster and with more precision using the robotic technology than standard laparoscopy.

AB - Introduction: Robotic technology has been postulated to improve performance in advanced surgical skills. We utilized a novel computerized assessment system to objectively describe the technical enhancement in task performance comparing robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation. Methods and procedures: Advanced laparoscopic surgeons (2-10 yrs experience) performed three unique task modules using laparoscopic and Telerobotic surgical instrumentation (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Performance was evaluated using a computerized assessment system (ProMIS, Dublin, Ireland) and results were recorded as time (s), path (mm) and precision. Each surgeon had an initial training session followed by two testing sessions for each module. A paired Student's t-test was used to analyze the data. Results: Ten surgeons completed the study. 8/10 surgeons had significant technical enhancement utilizing robotic technology. Conclusions: The ProMIS computerized assessment system can be modified to objectively obtain task performance data with robotic instrumentation. All the tasks were performed faster and with more precision using the robotic technology than standard laparoscopy.

KW - Human/robotic

KW - Technical education instruments

KW - Technical training/courses

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36248945010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36248945010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-007-9363-0

DO - 10.1007/s00464-007-9363-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 17522931

AN - SCOPUS:36248945010

VL - 21

SP - 2258

EP - 2261

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 12

ER -