A comparison of two walking while talking paradigms in aging

Clara Li, Joe Verghese, Roee Holtzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Our study aimed to [1] compare dual-task costs in gait and cognitive performance during two dual-task paradigms: walking while reciting alternate letters of the alphabet (WWR) and walking while counting backward by sevens (WWC); [2] examine the relationship between the gait and cognitive interference tasks when performed concurrently. Scope: Gait and cognitive performance were tested in 217 non-demented older adults (mean age 76. ±. 8.8 years; 56.2% female) under single and dual-task conditions. Velocity (cm/s) was obtained using an instrumented walkway. Cognitive performance was assessed using accuracy ratio: [correct responses]/[total responses]. Linear mixed effects models revealed significant dual-task costs, with slower velocity (p< .01) and decreased accuracy ratio (p<. .01) in WWR and WWC compared to their respective single task conditions. Greater dual-task costs in velocity (p<. .01) were observed in WWC compared to WWR. Pearson correlations revealed significant and positive relationships between gait and cognitive performance in WWR and WWC (p<. .01); increased accuracy ratio was associated with faster velocity. Conclusions: Our findings suggested that dual-task costs in gait increase as the complexity of the cognitive task increases. Furthermore, the positive association between the gait and cognitive tasks suggest that dual-task performance was not influenced by task prioritization strategies in this sample.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)415-419
Number of pages5
JournalGait and Posture
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Gait
Walking
Costs and Cost Analysis
Task Performance and Analysis

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Dual-task
  • Elderly
  • Walking
  • Walking while talking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Biophysics

Cite this

A comparison of two walking while talking paradigms in aging. / Li, Clara; Verghese, Joe; Holtzer, Roee.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2014, p. 415-419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Clara ; Verghese, Joe ; Holtzer, Roee. / A comparison of two walking while talking paradigms in aging. In: Gait and Posture. 2014 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 415-419.
@article{8736a96aea2f43369007bfbd3b4b4fc6,
title = "A comparison of two walking while talking paradigms in aging",
abstract = "Background: Our study aimed to [1] compare dual-task costs in gait and cognitive performance during two dual-task paradigms: walking while reciting alternate letters of the alphabet (WWR) and walking while counting backward by sevens (WWC); [2] examine the relationship between the gait and cognitive interference tasks when performed concurrently. Scope: Gait and cognitive performance were tested in 217 non-demented older adults (mean age 76. ±. 8.8 years; 56.2{\%} female) under single and dual-task conditions. Velocity (cm/s) was obtained using an instrumented walkway. Cognitive performance was assessed using accuracy ratio: [correct responses]/[total responses]. Linear mixed effects models revealed significant dual-task costs, with slower velocity (p< .01) and decreased accuracy ratio (p<. .01) in WWR and WWC compared to their respective single task conditions. Greater dual-task costs in velocity (p<. .01) were observed in WWC compared to WWR. Pearson correlations revealed significant and positive relationships between gait and cognitive performance in WWR and WWC (p<. .01); increased accuracy ratio was associated with faster velocity. Conclusions: Our findings suggested that dual-task costs in gait increase as the complexity of the cognitive task increases. Furthermore, the positive association between the gait and cognitive tasks suggest that dual-task performance was not influenced by task prioritization strategies in this sample.",
keywords = "Attention, Dual-task, Elderly, Walking, Walking while talking",
author = "Clara Li and Joe Verghese and Roee Holtzer",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.05.062",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "415--419",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of two walking while talking paradigms in aging

AU - Li, Clara

AU - Verghese, Joe

AU - Holtzer, Roee

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Our study aimed to [1] compare dual-task costs in gait and cognitive performance during two dual-task paradigms: walking while reciting alternate letters of the alphabet (WWR) and walking while counting backward by sevens (WWC); [2] examine the relationship between the gait and cognitive interference tasks when performed concurrently. Scope: Gait and cognitive performance were tested in 217 non-demented older adults (mean age 76. ±. 8.8 years; 56.2% female) under single and dual-task conditions. Velocity (cm/s) was obtained using an instrumented walkway. Cognitive performance was assessed using accuracy ratio: [correct responses]/[total responses]. Linear mixed effects models revealed significant dual-task costs, with slower velocity (p< .01) and decreased accuracy ratio (p<. .01) in WWR and WWC compared to their respective single task conditions. Greater dual-task costs in velocity (p<. .01) were observed in WWC compared to WWR. Pearson correlations revealed significant and positive relationships between gait and cognitive performance in WWR and WWC (p<. .01); increased accuracy ratio was associated with faster velocity. Conclusions: Our findings suggested that dual-task costs in gait increase as the complexity of the cognitive task increases. Furthermore, the positive association between the gait and cognitive tasks suggest that dual-task performance was not influenced by task prioritization strategies in this sample.

AB - Background: Our study aimed to [1] compare dual-task costs in gait and cognitive performance during two dual-task paradigms: walking while reciting alternate letters of the alphabet (WWR) and walking while counting backward by sevens (WWC); [2] examine the relationship between the gait and cognitive interference tasks when performed concurrently. Scope: Gait and cognitive performance were tested in 217 non-demented older adults (mean age 76. ±. 8.8 years; 56.2% female) under single and dual-task conditions. Velocity (cm/s) was obtained using an instrumented walkway. Cognitive performance was assessed using accuracy ratio: [correct responses]/[total responses]. Linear mixed effects models revealed significant dual-task costs, with slower velocity (p< .01) and decreased accuracy ratio (p<. .01) in WWR and WWC compared to their respective single task conditions. Greater dual-task costs in velocity (p<. .01) were observed in WWC compared to WWR. Pearson correlations revealed significant and positive relationships between gait and cognitive performance in WWR and WWC (p<. .01); increased accuracy ratio was associated with faster velocity. Conclusions: Our findings suggested that dual-task costs in gait increase as the complexity of the cognitive task increases. Furthermore, the positive association between the gait and cognitive tasks suggest that dual-task performance was not influenced by task prioritization strategies in this sample.

KW - Attention

KW - Dual-task

KW - Elderly

KW - Walking

KW - Walking while talking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904136342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904136342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.05.062

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.05.062

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 415

EP - 419

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

IS - 3

ER -